Again, yes I did. It’s in the video I posted in the OP. You refusing to watch it because your retarded point got called out doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. Funny how “truthers” have to deliberately ignore evidence, wouldn’t want that conflicting with your confirmation bias!
If that’s not your argument then who do you think did it? And it isn’t a text book example, you have literally zero evidence for this. The engineering/physics point is on my side. All you have is some CNN reporter saying “it’s going to blow up” lol.
Seriously, where’s your evidence for any of your claims?
Semantics, point is you posted a photo of the opposite side. I already posted evidence in the OP, the video contains footage of where tower 7 was hit.
You should try at least knowing what my argument is before posting and embarrassing yourself.
Complete projections, “truthers” are the ones with a horrible confirmation bias. Someone saying that doesn’t at all prove that it was a controlled demo by Mossad or the CIA, I want you to try and make that argument.
You arent presenting evidence though, your bringing up complete nothing burgers and vaguely implying its evidence of some vast conspiracy. Get real, someone saying "its going to blow up" from CNN is not even close to being evidence for this.
NIST does explain in great detail the engineering behind the collapse. The whole "truther" argument for tower 7 hinges on the lie that the tower collapsed for no reason when it was completely unharmed, but the easy to find reality is that it suffered horrible structural damage from falling debris from the twin towers and a fire that raged inside of it for 7 hours. Can you at least acknowledge that?
How does him saying "its about to blow up" at all in anyway prove that it was a controlled demolition conducted by Mossad/CIA ect?
basic laws of physics
The NIST report and all evidence concerning that are on my side though, not yours.
Considering his video is just repeating the points made in the NIST report, yes. The video, which does include footage that proves that "truthers" have lied about how tower 7 collapsed, it much more credible than the nonsense I see "truthers" post as evidence.
I found this clip of Ron, nowhere does he say anything about the towers being deliberately, nor does he mention tower 7 at all.
from Engineering professor Zdeněk Bažant http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/466.pdf
From structural engineer Ramon Gilsanz https://web.archive.org/web/20090419050714/http://www.structuremag.org/Archives/2007-11/SF-WTC7-Gilsanz-Nov07.pdf
Actual engineering experts agree with the NIST reports, its only confirmation biased "truthers" who try to nitpick it. Also, eye witness testimony is less than worthless and Ron Insana never testified to anything as far as I know, either way this wouldnt at all be evidence.
How is that absurd? What do you make of Muhammed Atta attending flight school, earning a pilots license from the FAA, going to the Miami airport and training on simulators of the exact planes that crashed into the towers, and boarding Flight 11 AND being on airport security camera footage boarding the plane? Its funny how convenient this "wow sounds suspecious" shit is for "truthers"
No dude, like I said when has a building had a fucking boeing jet smash into it at full speed and then have huge chunks of it smash into a smaller tower near it?
You fucks always do this shit, ask "w-why didnt this building fire cause it to collapse?" while you completely ignore the massive structural damage. It very obviously wasnt just a fire. Is this your "common sense" in action?
Another building? When has this ever happened before? When has a Boeing jet smashed into a tower at full speed and then debris from that tower fell through a near by smaller building causing massive structural damage and a fire that raged for 7 hours? It wasnt minimal at all.
"truthers" arent motivated by sense, but by emotions and mysticism.
The official narrative is pretty straight forward, you have to use reverse Occom's razor in order to believe in the incoherent, convoluted, and outright mystical shit you "truthers" believe. Its pure emotional outrage for you guys and not at all based on reality.
This is a report from 3 dudes who are affiliated with a conspiracy theory "truther" movement. No actual engineer disagrees with the NIST report or found serious issues with their findings. Again, trying to appeal to authority on this is a losing play for "truthers"
Heres some responses from actual engineers to the NIST report as well to rub your nose in it even more.
from Engineering professor Zdeněk Bažant http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/466.pdf
From structural engineer Ramon Gilsanz https://web.archive.org/web/20090419050714/http://www.structuremag.org/Archives/2007-11/SF-WTC7-Gilsanz-Nov07.pdf
Like I said, I already posted footage from the get go of tower 7 damage from falling debris. If you want to ignore this after your retarded point of pointing to the opposite side of the building was called out then that’s your choice. Either way you’re a perfect example of the emotional confirmation biased “truther” who won’t let something like reality get in the way of your conspiracy theory.