This is a great video debunking the popular “Truther” claims about Building 7. https://youtu.be/7PpsCCTMP8w
The points brought up in the video are:
• “Why wasn’t building 7 ever mentioned in the 911 Commission Reports?”**
This is because the Commission Reports were specifically about the actual targets of the attacks, not collateral damage like WTC 7. It was however investigated in a NIST report which is here https://www.nist.gov/publications/final-report-collapse-world-trade-center-building-7-federal-building-and-fire-safety-0
• “How could it collapse if it never was hit by a plane?”**
Pretty simple, huge chunks of burning debris crashed in through the top of WTC 7 from the towers. This not only caused massive structural damage, but also caused a massive fire to spread throughout WTC 7.
Truthers deceitfully only ever show pictures of it from the south, where it was not struck by debris, making it seem like it was a perfectly fine building that collapsed out of nowhere, but images of it from the north side clearly show the massive damage WTC 7 sustained from the falling debris
• “Building 7 collapsed in free fall out of nowhere! This is only possible through controlled demolition!”**
This is just an outright lie. Footage of the attack clearly shows building 7 folding in on itself over the course of hours before finally collapsing. All footage of the “free fall” conveniently only ever starts right as the building falls, it never shows the footage before of the penthouse caving in.
Remember, the truth doesn’t fear investigation.
How does him saying "its about to blow up" at all in anyway prove that it was a controlled demolition conducted by Mossad/CIA ect?
The NIST report and all evidence concerning that are on my side though, not yours.
What? I never said anything about the cia or mossad lol. Only presenting evidence that was recorded on the day showing it was blown up.
Also Nist never explained the collapse of the building nor did they even try. They claimed column 47 failed and then after that collapse was inevitable. No serious expert who understands physics would be able to explain a symmetric simultaneous collapse at free fall speeds. This is why nist didn't even try.
You arent presenting evidence though, your bringing up complete nothing burgers and vaguely implying its evidence of some vast conspiracy. Get real, someone saying "its going to blow up" from CNN is not even close to being evidence for this.
NIST does explain in great detail the engineering behind the collapse. The whole "truther" argument for tower 7 hinges on the lie that the tower collapsed for no reason when it was completely unharmed, but the easy to find reality is that it suffered horrible structural damage from falling debris from the twin towers and a fire that raged inside of it for 7 hours. Can you at least acknowledge that?
Eyewitness testimony from the day saying the buildings was blown up is not a complete nothing burger. You are choosing to ignore it because it doesn't fit with your government science narrative. Nist never even tested for explosives nor did they test the explosion hypothesis. They also couldn't explain the molten metal or iron spheres.
Complete projections, “truthers” are the ones with a horrible confirmation bias. Someone saying that doesn’t at all prove that it was a controlled demo by Mossad or the CIA, I want you to try and make that argument.