This is a great video debunking the popular “Truther” claims about Building 7. https://youtu.be/7PpsCCTMP8w
The points brought up in the video are:
• “Why wasn’t building 7 ever mentioned in the 911 Commission Reports?”**
This is because the Commission Reports were specifically about the actual targets of the attacks, not collateral damage like WTC 7. It was however investigated in a NIST report which is here https://www.nist.gov/publications/final-report-collapse-world-trade-center-building-7-federal-building-and-fire-safety-0
• “How could it collapse if it never was hit by a plane?”**
Pretty simple, huge chunks of burning debris crashed in through the top of WTC 7 from the towers. This not only caused massive structural damage, but also caused a massive fire to spread throughout WTC 7.
Truthers deceitfully only ever show pictures of it from the south, where it was not struck by debris, making it seem like it was a perfectly fine building that collapsed out of nowhere, but images of it from the north side clearly show the massive damage WTC 7 sustained from the falling debris
• “Building 7 collapsed in free fall out of nowhere! This is only possible through controlled demolition!”**
This is just an outright lie. Footage of the attack clearly shows building 7 folding in on itself over the course of hours before finally collapsing. All footage of the “free fall” conveniently only ever starts right as the building falls, it never shows the footage before of the penthouse caving in.
Remember, the truth doesn’t fear investigation.
Again, yes I did. It’s in the video I posted in the OP. You refusing to watch it because your retarded point got called out doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. Funny how “truthers” have to deliberately ignore evidence, wouldn’t want that conflicting with your confirmation bias!
That's what makes you a pathetic goof on this topic, bud. It's no wonder nobody here seems to respect you.
Like I said, I already posted footage from the get go of tower 7 damage from falling debris. If you want to ignore this after your retarded point of pointing to the opposite side of the building was called out then that’s your choice. Either way you’re a perfect example of the emotional confirmation biased “truther” who won’t let something like reality get in the way of your conspiracy theory.
"Reality" is an interesting cudgel for you to try to use, isn't it?
Give me a moment to go scan your video to take a screenshot and upload a photo, like the competent person that you aren't, and we can alllll see what you're trying to argue so lazily.
No, you’re the lazy one who’s only just now considering watching the video that I posted in the OP. You would better at deserting the truth if you weren’t such a chronically butthurt person ruled by your emotions and confirmation bias.