This is a great video debunking the popular “Truther” claims about Building 7. https://youtu.be/7PpsCCTMP8w
The points brought up in the video are:
• “Why wasn’t building 7 ever mentioned in the 911 Commission Reports?”**
This is because the Commission Reports were specifically about the actual targets of the attacks, not collateral damage like WTC 7. It was however investigated in a NIST report which is here https://www.nist.gov/publications/final-report-collapse-world-trade-center-building-7-federal-building-and-fire-safety-0
• “How could it collapse if it never was hit by a plane?”**
Pretty simple, huge chunks of burning debris crashed in through the top of WTC 7 from the towers. This not only caused massive structural damage, but also caused a massive fire to spread throughout WTC 7.
Truthers deceitfully only ever show pictures of it from the south, where it was not struck by debris, making it seem like it was a perfectly fine building that collapsed out of nowhere, but images of it from the north side clearly show the massive damage WTC 7 sustained from the falling debris
• “Building 7 collapsed in free fall out of nowhere! This is only possible through controlled demolition!”**
This is just an outright lie. Footage of the attack clearly shows building 7 folding in on itself over the course of hours before finally collapsing. All footage of the “free fall” conveniently only ever starts right as the building falls, it never shows the footage before of the penthouse caving in.
Remember, the truth doesn’t fear investigation.
Hey, notice how the smoke is coming from the opposite side? Like I said, the video shows the footage of where the tower 7 was hit by debris. Pathetic attempt dude.
That's dust, you idiot. Where are the large holes in the top of the building? You said "through the top", after all.
Is that all you've got? "Hurf durf pathetic" like the sad projection that always follows a tucked tail?
Bring ME some equal evidence, or shut the fuck up and take your loss. You rely on far too much say-so in this post and it's what is actually pathetic.
Semantics, point is you posted a photo of the opposite side. I already posted evidence in the OP, the video contains footage of where tower 7 was hit.
You should try at least knowing what my argument is before posting and embarrassing yourself.
Point is, you did not post a photo from the side in question. You are just relying on say-so. Fuckin stop that lazy shit.
Again, yes I did. It’s in the video I posted in the OP. You refusing to watch it because your retarded point got called out doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. Funny how “truthers” have to deliberately ignore evidence, wouldn’t want that conflicting with your confirmation bias!