Dancing Israelis are a meme. I want you to explain how "Dancing Israelis" proves anything?
Also, Israeli intelligence picked up Al-Qaeda movement before the attack and warned America about it, so that alone ruins your retareded theory.
The video is not at all a strawman. The guy who made it went to a "Truther" protest event and got all of their main points directly from them and then showed how each were wrong. And while AE911 might have said that, the truth is that the vast majority of your average "truther" operates under the idea that WTC7 was completely fine and then collapsed out of nowhere due to secret government agents who infiltrated the building before hand, rigged it with explosives, and then detonated it. In regards to something like that then yeah I would totally call something like adjusting the freefall rate at 2.3 seconds is nitpicking.
And this event how now real comparison in history. Towers have suffered fires and have been hit by planes, but never to this degree. A Boeing 767 is fucking huge, with its wingspan almost being the entire diameter of the the twin towers. It would be like comparing someone wrecking their motorcycle into a building to someone wrecking their 18 wheeler into one. For the Empire state building crash you pointed out, here is the size comparison of the two different planes:
https://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/compare-aircraft-results.php?aircraft1=81&aircraft2=251
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fzp0dGyaUAEERQT?format=jpg&name=900x900
from Engineering professor Zdeněk Bažant http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/466.pdf
From structural engineer Ramon Gilsanz https://web.archive.org/web/20090419050714/http://www.structuremag.org/Archives/2007-11/SF-WTC7-Gilsanz-Nov07.pdf
Comments from other engineers on the NIST report.
"Sounds like the video is debunking side issues without reviewing the hard data, even though it admits the corrected freefall curve without admitting how it contradicts the NIST thesis."
Incorrect, the entire issue with WTC 7 from the "truther" point has always been rooted in that according to them, it was a building that fell in free fall out of nowhere despite never being touched in the attacks. They also pointed out that this was supposedly covered up by the government.
But the video reveals that it did suffer major damage from falling debris and the NIST report which did investigate it. That has been the corner stone of the "truther" movement and now that the cat is out of the bag, you guys are forced to abandon that entire point and instead nitpick over the rate of fall or whatever else. The point is that a giant chunk of the building was ripped away by falling debris and a fire raged inside of it for hours, so it wasnt an untouched building that just fell out of nowhere.
"However, even considering the evidence of skyscrapers hit by planes, no parallel to 1-2 has ever been seen either."
Thanks for realizing this. This attack was unique so people just pointing to some other tower that had a fire and didnt collapse arent getting it.
Remember that time Owen Benjamin scammed his followers out of money so that he could buy land for himself? He told his conspiracytard followers the money would be used to build a park that they could all use then just made up some bullshit excuse and bought the land for himself instead.
He successfully bet on the fact that his fans are such stupid cucks that they will still support him even after scamming them since he essentially runs an online cult for low IQ simpletons.
None of this is true, he took power in his own officers coup and almost immediately aligned himself within the Soviet sphere during the Cold War. During that time he took up a hardcore third worldist (anti white) position and would support any and every radical communist terrorist he could. This included butchers like Mugabe against Rhodesia.
There’s always some vague nonsense about gold standards or a rothschilds bank with figures like this too. Pure dreck.
How did they not do their due diligence? Because they disproved a conspiracy theory you believe in?
I make this thread all the time to prove a point, that "truthers" are emotionally driven and gather in their own bubbles and hype themselves up with righteous indignation and paranoia until they sometimes venture out and behave like obnoxious assholes. If you sit down and just actually look at everything, the entire "truther" argument is completely ridiculous and makes no sense at all, you have to use a reverse occoms razor in order to make it make sense. This thread has been better, but when I first made these threads no one even attempted to argue the point and just shitposted and called me glowie/kike/mossad/cia/shill/bot ect.
Explain why I make this thread every month and you guys think posting a video clip of someone saying they heard an explosion is somehow evidence of the most sinister conspiracy in human history, yet the NIST report, which was backed up by other engineers, is not good enough for you for the most inane bullshit reasons.
Exactly, "truther" stuff is an emotional feeling issue and not something that reason and evidence are going to interfere with. I make these threads over and over again to prove this point to everyone here. You guys cannot back up any of your claims and this whole thing is rooted in paranoia and ignorance.
You guys post this shit every time. This was some study funded by a "truther" organization and made by a few college students. Not even close to being an authoritative take on the matter, especially when other engineers have reviewed the NIST report and approved of its finding, which I already posted here.
No, you’re the lazy one who’s only just now considering watching the video that I posted in the OP. You would better at deserting the truth if you weren’t such a chronically butthurt person ruled by your emotions and confirmation bias.
You’re only saying the NIST report is government bullshit because it disproves your confirmation biased theory. And it wasn’t JUST a fire, it was a fire plus the massive structural damage from the twin towers smashing through it. There’s not really another example of this, you guys are being blind when you think of this as JUST a building fire, which it wasn’t.
Didn’t read lol