"Vaccination...could push the evolution of strains that evade their protection...until almost everyone is vaccinated"
They can't keep from being contradictory for more than two sentences....
How many of those deaths were also COVID deaths?
Wrong year though... this is 2020.
Welcome shill! Hope the pay is good for regurgitating those lies.
Don't worry, just like in England, CIA officers who got a Placebo still qualify as "fully vaccinated" for purposes of passports ( https://conspiracies.win/p/12jcci2AGw/x/c/ )
In a lot of cases they do report the truth in a way to shape/control the narrative when it's coming out anyways. In this case, it's probably way more than 2,000... but soften up people a little bit so that when the news comes out that it's 20,000, people have already lost interest.
Notice how they list it as "age unknown" even though it says it right in description
Honestly, when the fake news reports on something it helps confirm the opposite is real.
The words "trust" and "science" should never be in the same phrase. Science is all about not trusting and asking questions.
How to make an effective vaccine:
- Tell everyone it is effective
- Run a different test on people who are vaccinated so that you get fewer positive hits
- When this doesn't work, stop testing altogether.
I remember the original post. I said, I'll remember this and see if it actually becomes true. Sure enough...
This is the same activist judge (Richard Frye) that ruled 16 year olds could vote and that voting drop boxes were perfectly safe and acceptable. I guarantee there is dirty money flowing to him.
They've always admitted the existence of unidentified flying objects (spelled out because people confuse it with aliens). A Chinese aircraft that they don't recognize is a UFO.
"breakthrough technology", which is a phrase that has generally always been classified as "woo".
Except not. That phrase is used in practically every single publicly released DARPA/ONR/AFRL request for proposals and statement about what they do. It is an unbelievably commonly used phrase.
Hell, here is the mission statement for DARPA which uses the phrase in the first sentence: https://www.darpa.mil/about-us/about-darpa
This looks like a fresh college grad intern wrote the document.
It's a total joke that says basically: (1) This is really important (2) lots of agencies need to work together on it (3) most of the stuff we see is explainable (4) some of it isn't and (5) more research is needed.
I think we can definitely say that no one will get cancer from it in 5-10 years either. Because they have obviously done 10 year safety trials already otherwise why would it be deemed safe?
The bill number is 2006. https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2021/2006/
I don't believe the 70% number at all.
Even the local counties including places in NYC aren't at 70%. Bronx is reporting 38%, most counties are reporting around 40% (source: https://www.observertoday.com/news/coronavirus/2021/06/many-ny-restrictions-lifted-as-vaccination-benchmark-met/)
Same, except my company is asking for proof to remove the mask. Same thing, same result.
Sorry comrade, but the woods belong to the community. You must go live in the camp prepared for you.
Headline doesn't actually match bill text. Here is the bill text (it allows cremation via chemicals): https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/2021/related/proposals/sb228
As far as disposal it does allow "Disposing of the remains in any other lawful manner that does not harm the environment, but only if the remains are reduced to a particle size of one-eighth inch or less." One could construe that to using it as food fertilizer, and I suppose nothing would stop people from doing that. But the title is really stretching it.
Good thing they've had enough time to ensure there are no serious long term (5+ years) side effects as well!
And that is including the obviously fake staged propaganda stories like this one.