1
Candelabro 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yea my bad, got the two Adams' mixed up

1
Candelabro 1 point ago +1 / -0

Any routes to accessing the alternate economy that must be happening?

3
Candelabro 3 points ago +3 / -0

Winning involves understanding that those of us who refuse the mark have a home to return to.

Those in power have had a long time to plan this in secret. They see themselves as gods and want to keep us in this place to rule over us forever. Many of us will cave, and I feel a deep sympathy for them.

This is spiritual warfare. You only lose when you submit.

1
Candelabro 1 point ago +1 / -0

And ya know, if there is no infinite, then at least we won't have to love through the technocracy that's coming

2
Candelabro 2 points ago +2 / -0

Activate the slaughter bots. But nah I hope most folks see that the is a well executed long term plan. Have faith, and be brave in this world. The best you can do is accept that we live the now for the promise of the infinite. I for one will not let this fleeting reality destroy my chance of going home.

1
Candelabro 1 point ago +1 / -0

Okay then read the gods debris thought experiment by Douglas Adams.

1
Candelabro 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yea the fact they released that info but its still listed as "case deferred" and cause unknown is sketchy as fuck.

2
Candelabro 2 points ago +2 / -0

I always want to respond to your posts but there's just so much each time. Ya know once in a deep trance state I was informed that I'm on my second to last life, as long as I don't kill myself. Wonder if I got the right message there.

2
Candelabro 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just gotta read the books man.

2
Candelabro 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yea I just use that link to push people further down the rabbit hole. I myself think they've done testing on this gene therapy for years and knew well in advance what they were doing rolling out like this. But for folks questioning "are there different doses?" that link is a good source to make them go "oh shit this isn't just a free for all injection"

2
Candelabro 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you read the hitchhikers guide series, he has a very sardonic sense of humor about the nature of power structures. He definitely doesn't support any of it, but pokes fun at the absurdity of it all.

2
Candelabro 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yea pretty much. I no longer talk to my former best friend. My buddy who hosts game night has cancelled for months now cuz the other two of us keep bombarding him with questions about his belief in what's going on. Like dude I don't care if you took the shot (though part of me respects someone less for doing so) but if you're being silent on these mandates I have a fucking problem.

2
Candelabro 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well if you've ever read Douglas Adams, he 100% believed in a deep state.

1
Candelabro 1 point ago +2 / -1

"it is a well-known fact that those people who must want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it. To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job."

1
Candelabro 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well. Something is going on. Ebola is just a name. The underlying health conditions are very real. Be it germ vs terrain theory. They're working to kill and enslave us, so its gonna happen under one name or another.

2
Candelabro 2 points ago +2 / -0

Meant to thank you for this tip. Bookmarked archive.is to do this in the future.

6
Candelabro 6 points ago +7 / -1

I mean she ain't wrong. Using fear tactics to push people towards a personal or political goal... the definition of terrorism.

I keep wondering how folks accept calling us anti-gene therapy folks terrorists. Terrorism involves overt acts of fear propagation and violence, the only ones I see doing that are the folks advocating forced penetration and the loss of livelihood.

When the terrorists get away with calling their adversary terrorists... it just might be clown world.

1
Candelabro 1 point ago +1 / -0

So in other words. If there is no consciousness to experience "that which is" then "that which is" wouldn't fundamentally exist, as there is no conscious basis for establishing its concrete existence. Thusly, if consciousness is fundamentally what brings "reality" into existence, is it proper to think that perhaps consciousness is what shapes the very nature of "reality" itself?

1
Candelabro 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or as another "what if". What if our physical reality is LITERALLY shaped by our consensus view of it? What if back when the general populous thought the world was flat (no dig on flat earthers here) the earth was actually flat, and as we evolved to see the world as round it BECAME round as a result of our collective belief in it. What if physical reality is actually a constantly changing thing that depends upon our perception of it in order to be perceived at all.

8
Candelabro 8 points ago +9 / -1

I tried telling my normie friends this for the duration of the Q problem. Yet still here they are equating me with q for not trusting an experimental gene therapy...

I don't talk to my normie friends as much ad I used to.

2
Candelabro 2 points ago +2 / -0

We all knew the real pandemic was coming next. Might as well be ebola.

5
Candelabro 5 points ago +5 / -0

Ahh shit, my mom said she'd never post my baby videos.

by pkvi
1
Candelabro 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its easy to say "fuck that he made his choice" but the weight of the bodies that will be piling up in front of us soon will make it hard to hold the weight of that judgment on our souls sooner than later.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›