I agree it is idiotic and they are gaslighted.
The 20% are the abnormal to the 80%
I think we are not in sync.
Remember:
Normal is the common pattern of behavior found among the majority.
Abnormal is the common pattern of behavior found among the minority.
Our world has humans that engage in all kinds of sexual behavior, some normal some abnormal. The behavior is based on what they want and that is a natural instinct = Natural. Normal vs Abnormal is a measure of how many want one thing versus the other and it stays very consecutive over time.
The pet analysis extended to the whole population makes it even more enlightening.
U.S. Population is ~332.7M
-
65.5% own neither dog or cat
-
21% are dog owners
-
13.5% are cat owners
Non Dog/Cat ownership is normal.
Dog ownership is abnormal.
Cat ownership is abnormal.
This may be true, but they didn't even come close to beating a 200th ranked male player in 1998...
"Over their long and illustrious careers, there have been a few peculiar incidents and instances. Once, both sisters lost to a particular player on the same day.
During the 1998 Australian Open, a German tennis player, Karsten Braasch beat both sisters during their matches played in a light moment. Karsten was ranked around the 200-mark in the world. “It was 1998 Australian Open and the Williams sisters, Venus and Serena, had seen some of the male players practicing. On the basis of what they saw, they were convinced that they could beat a man ranked around 200 in the world and wanted to set up a game. I didn’t take much persuading, it seemed like a fun thing to do.”
The German player reflected on the match he played against Serena and stated, “My first game of the afternoon, just a one-set match, was against Serena. We were out on one of the backcourts at Melbourne Park, No 17 I think it was. I felt so relaxed that I didn’t even warm up properly. We started playing and I raced into a 5-0 lead.”“At this point, Venus turned up to watch. She had just finished a press conference after a quarter-final loss against Lindsey Davenport. In the end, I won my game against Serena 6-1 but by the time we were at the net shaking hands, Venus was on the court, ready to have a go against me as well. The game against Venus was very similar. I ended up winning 6-2.”
Although Karsten won the match, it was played with a light intent. Nonetheless, he remembered meeting Venus again later in the future. He recollected that moment and stated, “I saw Venus a few months later at the French Open she came up to me with a big smile on her face and said, ‘You know that thing in Australia – it never happened!”
The Sars-Cov-2 virus has not been isolated and therefore, there is no valid vaccine, in fact, No virus has ever been isolated even though scientists can isolate objects of that size - e.g. exosomes.
The PCR tests are a fraud and meaningless for diagnosis of a Sars-Cov-2 infection, in fact, they are designed for deceit.
Q: How do you design a test to identify something that has not been isolated?
A: You can't, you first must fully identify what you are looking for.
Q: How do you design a test to identify spike proteins or antibodies allegedly created by something that has not been isolated?
A: You can't, you must first identify the agent that creates the spike proteins or antibodies and than demonstrate the process to create them by (1) isolating the agent, (2) introducing the agent to a body, and (3) witnessing the body producing spike proteins or antibodies.
These are facts. Do your own research. Do not ask me to prove what can readily be discovered on your own.
You can start by watching these videos:
Typical shill need not reply with:
The Sars-Cov-2 virus has been isolated
The vaccines for Sars-Cov-2 are safe and effective
PCR tests are accurate at detecting the Sars-Cov-2
More to be added as the shills chime in!
The Sars-Cov-2 virus has not been isolated and therefore, there is no valid vaccine, in fact, No virus has ever been isolated even though scientists can isolate objects of that size - e.g. exosomes.
The PCR tests are a fraud and meaningless for diagnosis of a Sars-Cov-2 infection, in fact, they are designed for deceit.
Q: How do you design a test to identify something that has not been isolated?
A: You can't, you first must fully identify what you are looking for.
Q: How do you design a test to identify spike proteins or antibodies allegedly created by something that has not been isolated?
A: You can't, you must first identify the agent that creates the spike proteins or antibodies and than demonstrate the process to create them by (1) isolating the agent, (2) introducing the agent to a body, and (3) witnessing the body producing spike proteins or antibodies.
These are facts. Do your own research. Do not ask me to prove what can readily be discovered on your own.
You can start by watching these videos:
Typical shill need not reply with:
The Sars-Cov-2 virus has been isolated
The vaccines for Sars-Cov-2 are safe and effective
PCR tests are accurate at detecting the Sars-Cov-2
More to be added as the shills chime in!
No - it's like saying,
The Sars-Cov-2 virus has not been isolated.
Until it has been isolated, we cannot identify it, we cannot test for it, and we cannot create a vaccine for it.
We don't know what it is.
Things need to be done in order:
A. Isolate it
B. Identify what it is
C. Create a test for that exposes its presence in people
D. Create a vaccine to fight it
The Sars-Cov-2 virus has not been isolated and therefore, the PCR tests are completely fraudulent and meaningless for diagnosis of an alleged Sars-Cov-2 infection.
How can you identify, in a test, something that has not been isolated and quantified?
You can't. Follow the logic.
The PCR tests are completely fraudulent and meaningless...
How are viruses discovered and identified in the first place? Harven Farber Interview Feb 18, 2020 by Jon Rappoport
The earthshaking Etienne De Harven interview by Celia Farber
The question I’ve been asking since 1987—
If the experts are going to claim a particular virus causes a particular disease—how do they know that virus exists in the first place?
For example, the supposedly new coronavirus in China. For example, Ebola. For example, HIV. For example, the coronavirus supposedly causing SARS (2003). How do researchers know these viruses exist?
“Well, of course they know. They must.”
That is not a satisfactory answer—even though most people would offer it.
The question can become very interesting, when you stop and consider researchers working away in biowar labs fiddling with viruses. How do they know they’re tweaking viruses that actually exist?
On a more mundane frontier, when scientists tell us they’re rushing to develop a vaccine against a virus that is harming the population, how do they know that virus exists to begin with?
See full article in link above
GAIA - Ancient Civilizations
4 Seasons, 42 Episodes
Excellent series on the possibilities.
Sure there are many 'out there' hypotheses, but very thought provoking indeed.