The Sars-Cov-2 virus has not been isolated and therefore, there is no valid vaccine, in fact, No virus has ever been isolated even though scientists can isolate objects of that size - e.g. exosomes.
The PCR tests are a fraud and meaningless for diagnosis of a Sars-Cov-2 infection, in fact, they are designed for deceit.
Q: How do you design a test to identify something that has not been isolated?
A: You can't, you first must fully identify what you are looking for.
Q: How do you design a test to identify spike proteins or antibodies allegedly created by something that has not been isolated?
A: You can't, you must first identify the agent that creates the spike proteins or antibodies and than demonstrate the process to create them by (1) isolating the agent, (2) introducing the agent to a body, and (3) witnessing the body producing spike proteins or antibodies.
These are facts. Do your own research. Do not ask me to prove what can readily be discovered on your own.
I'm not shilling, but I have done some light reading on the topic we're discussing. I agree that no one has physically isolated the SARS-CoV-2 - I went down that rabbithole when I learned of Koch's Postulates. Apparently they (the microbiologists) say they don't need to go through the work of isolating the virus because they have decoded the genome of the virus. This dovetails with Icke's claim it exists on a computer. I call it a rabbithole because apparently Koch's Postulates are difficult enough to fulfil that few, if any, viruses have been isolated in that manner... leading some people to doubt in the existence of viruses and pathogens altogether.
I am not, at this time, willing to doubt the existence of viruses because virus theory makes more sense to me than the alternative explanations I've heard. Neither am I willing to believe the SARS-CoV-2 virus is nonexistent, based on the number of scientists out there analyzing the data. I think if the foundational claims were a hoax we'd have had more people in the medical community speaking out. It's more likely the virus exists, but the hoax was the carefully crafted lies surrounding the infection rates ("cases"), deaths, long term effects, and endless MSM propaganda and on and on.
Q: How do you design a test to identify something that has not been isolated?
A: You can't, you first must fully identify what you are looking for.
Q: How do you design a test to identify spike proteins or antibodies allegedly created by something that has not been isolated?
A: You can't, you must first identify the agent that creates the spike proteins or antibodies and than demonstrate the process to create them by (1) isolating the agent, (2) introducing the agent to a body, and (3) witnessing the body producing spike proteins or antibodies.
These are facts. Do your own research. Do not ask me to prove what can readily be discovered on your own.
You can start by watching these videos:
SpaceBusters
Typical shill need not reply with:
The Sars-Cov-2 virus has been isolated
The vaccines for Sars-Cov-2 are safe and effective
PCR tests are accurate at detecting the Sars-Cov-2
More to be added as the shills chime in!
I'm not shilling, but I have done some light reading on the topic we're discussing. I agree that no one has physically isolated the SARS-CoV-2 - I went down that rabbithole when I learned of Koch's Postulates. Apparently they (the microbiologists) say they don't need to go through the work of isolating the virus because they have decoded the genome of the virus. This dovetails with Icke's claim it exists on a computer. I call it a rabbithole because apparently Koch's Postulates are difficult enough to fulfil that few, if any, viruses have been isolated in that manner... leading some people to doubt in the existence of viruses and pathogens altogether.
I am not, at this time, willing to doubt the existence of viruses because virus theory makes more sense to me than the alternative explanations I've heard. Neither am I willing to believe the SARS-CoV-2 virus is nonexistent, based on the number of scientists out there analyzing the data. I think if the foundational claims were a hoax we'd have had more people in the medical community speaking out. It's more likely the virus exists, but the hoax was the carefully crafted lies surrounding the infection rates ("cases"), deaths, long term effects, and endless MSM propaganda and on and on.