Converts to Islam, comes out hating on Jews, what a shocker.

Assange escaped to an Ecuadorian embassy to avoid a rape charge in Sweden, which has been dropped. Before that he was out on bail on an espionage charge, where it has been decided that his time has been served for this charge. This video seems to me like another hit piece against the West.

Edit: Actually it was in 2019 when he was charged with the Espionage Act, something he plead guilty to in 2024, this year: to conspiring to obtain and disclose classified U.S. national defence documents.

The Espionage Act of 1917 prohibited obtaining information, recording pictures, or copying descriptions of any information relating to the national defense with intent or reason to believe that the information may be used for the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation.

How many Gentile frequencies have been vibrated out of existence, by them falling for the Jew suggestion of holding onto the meaning of words, so far?

Some 100 years ago, Nazi would be a reference to an awkward or clumsy peasant. I guess this word never lost its meaning.

Not a joke, but an insult. Also this is Germany, the land of the Nazis, where terms like Nazi mod is coming from, referencing someone wanting to ban someone they disagree with.

Faith is proved by good deeds. If someone claims to be of faith, then you see them going around spreading wrath, hatred, and strife, then you know they walk in the flesh, and their faith is in vain.

If you come to faith (marry Christ), then lose your faith (cheat on your wife), then it is impossible to renew your faith to repentance, as Jesus can not be sacrificed on the cross a second time for you.

In Christ, there is no sin, so if you abide in him, you do not sin.

Christ died on the cross to fulfil the Law. Chris died on the cross to show that we are all sinners, in need of salvation, which is by faith in Christ keeping the Law on our behalf.

Galatians 5

1. Stand fast therefore in the libertie wherewith Christ hath made vs free, and bee not intangled againe with the yoke of bondage.

What do you mean by responsibility to God? In Christ we are made free.

Joshua 24

15. And if it seeme euill vnto you to serue the Lord, choose you this day whome you will serue, whether the gods which your fathers serued that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose lande ye dwell: but as for mee and my house, we will serue the Lord.

What are the responsibilities that females have been neglecting that males have? What are the responsibilities that females have been neglecting that females have?

No? Not as far as I know. If you are thinking about Gog and Magog surrounding Jerusalem, and God destroying them, that happens at the end of the 1000 year reign of Christ, which happens after the second coming of Christ. Those who will be a part of the 1000 year kingdom, where Christ rules the world, is those who have their names written in the book of life, which is those who kept the faith till the end: not something exclusive to the Jews.

Just so it is said, the Jews were the chosen people. And what were they chosen for? To bring forth Christ: Jesus was born of the tribe of Judea, tracing his line back to King David. One of the elements of the Old Testament is keeping the line that Christ would come from alive, as through Christ, all the nations would be blessed. Today, saying that they are the chosen people, is implying that there will come another Christ from them. I guess you could say they are the natural branches, and God can graft them back in again.

Those over 60 do not think Jews are the chosen people, they support Zionism as they still remember people rising up and wanting to kill all Jews in our own backyard. Also the man of sin (who Paul talked about) was revealed to be the Bishop of Rome, Protestants have known this for some 500 years now. Catholics are desperate to subvert their identity as the whore of Babylon, so they push the narrative of a Jewish Messiah being the final Antichrist, as their scapegoat.

Has the Jews of Colorado spit on Christians? Christians will not stand alongside Muslims, as in Muslim controlled nations, Christians are not allowed to raise children. Jews have been given their own state, so they have someplace to go once they start facing persecution (people wanting to kill all Jews): among those Jews making up their own nation, some are going to be more radical, but at least they are being called out by other Jews for acting like barbarians.

Last time we were pulled into a conflict in the middle-east, was after Muslims attacked New York. Now we risk being dragged into another conflict if Iran attacks our allies Israel; but it will not be endless, as the gloves will not be on, and Israel would be allowed to do whatever it takes to get the job done. In Iraq, the goal was to make sure that they did not have weapons of mass destruction, that was accomplished, the goal was not to destroy anyone who resisted US presence there.

The ones framing the narrative about Jewish power, is a bunch of Muslims, and PDW does not consist of Muslims. Christians stand alongside Jews, and do not take issue with a Governor being Jewish. Usually the narrative about Jewish power, is just another way to hate on people with a Western European background, and the sort of stuff you expect hearing from the people on the far left that been taught to hate where they came from, or from people that want to see the west burn. Thus it is not allowed on places where they claim to be patriots, as it is counterproductive.

At no point does she claim that the letter she received is from Tucker Carlsen.

Are people stopped being payed posting on here?

The force generated from the 100.000 ton tower falling is greater than the resistance from the floors below. As the tower is falling, energy is generated. It gains momentum as long as it keeps moving downward. Even though it loses some energy hitting the floor below it, by such a heavy object falling it regains that energy, plus some extra energy, and hits the next floor even harder than it did the floor above it.

If you remove the top 30 floors from the twin towers, where it now has 80 floors, and drop an 100.000 ton anvil on top of the tower, floor 80 will be crushed, as it is not designed to withstand an 100.000 object falling on top of it. No part of the building was designed to have a 100.000 ton object, that be the top 30 floor of the tower, drop on top of it, which is what happened.

The beams would be able to support 100.000 tons yes, but not 100.000 tons falling on top of them, that is the difference.

An example would be if you hold a 100.000 ton anvil above one of the towers, with the same surface area as the towers, and dropped it upon the tower, the beams would not be built to handle this, and the whole tower would end up collapsing from the impact of the anvil dropping on top of it: one floor at the time, each floor collapses in about 1/10 of a second as the weight of the anvil above falls on top of it: in 1 second 10 floors would have collapsed.

The collapse was not caused not caused by the crash, it was caused by jet fuel burning, bending the steel beams supporting the structure of the tower.

I can do some math for you:

Each tower weighed about 500,000 tons. The airplanes hit around floor 80. The towers had 110 floor. About 25% of the tower was above where the airplanes hit. That means that the section of the towers coming down, weighed about 100,000 tons, more than enough to crush the floor below and continue down without losing any momentum, once the support of the structure below gave out.

The guy who is amazed that in Russia you can put coins into shopping cart. Or the hippie guru that is anti-war and anti-establishment, and this somehow appeal to the Republicans. But probably the guy selling brain pills to his listeners, as he knows they sure need them.

The weight of the towers above where the airplanes hit is great enough that enough energy is generated as the towers moves downward to crush the floors below it.

Momentum of the weight of the tower falling from above it.

It falled from jetfuel burning, and steal beams bending, making the towers collapse. Easiest way to debunk that it was not a controlled demolition, is that there was not heard any explosives going off, before the towers came down.

WTC 7 did collapse after taking structural damage from the debris from the two towers coming down right next to it. Among the debris, was liquid aluminum, holding a temperature of 660 degrees Celsius or 1220 degrees Fahrenheit, making WTC 7 catch on fire. The fire fighters in New York had already stormed into the two towers, and was among the victims when they came down, so no firefighters was send into WTC 7 to try and put out the fire there. So instead they let it burn, and collapse.

The skyscrapers did fall from the top, and moved vertically, in a down direction, so most of the towers is going to fall into its own footprint, as there is no force pushing the towers sideways. As it was falling, huge clouds formed, as material from the tower was pulverized from the force of the falling tower, covering New York in a layer of dust.

If the conspiracy is that it was a controlled demolition, and that Mossad had some agents in a parking lot documenting it, then by all means, go with that. Usually this conspiracy falls apart ones it is shown that it was not a controlled demolition.