1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

The sun moves in a circular path above our head. The Arctic is inside the circular path of the sun, while the Antarctica is outside the circular path of the sun. The outside circular path (Antarctica) makes a much bigger circle around the earth, then the inside circular path (Arctic). If you are inside or outside the circular path the sun makes, once you get far enough away from the sun, it will get dark outside, as sunlight no longer reaches you, making it cold, and water at sea level turn to a solid form, known as ice.

Two places will ice form in a circular shape. One at the centre of the earth, that be the Arctic. The other at the edge of the known earth, known as the Antarctica, which makes a much bigger ice circle.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. The closer you are to the sun, at sea level, the hotter it gets. The further away you are from the sun at sea level, the colder it gets. In December, the Arctic experience little to no sun light, making water at sea level to freeze; in June, the Arctic experience 24 hours sunlight, making the ice at sea level to melt.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

A theory of how the sun creates heat: when sunlight interacts with something, it makes it vibrate. At sea level, all the heavy molecules are, like O2. The heavier a molecule is, the more energy it produces once it vibrates, which we experienced as heat. 1000 meters over sea level, the air is thinner, less heavy molecules are here, producing less energy ones sunlight interacts with it, making it colder the higher up in the air you go.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

Another thing that came to my attention, is that the average elevation of Mongolia is 1580 meters above the sea level. Whatever parts in northern China that gets cold, could be because of the elevation.

The Gobi is overall a cold desert, with frost and occasionally snow occurring on its dunes. Besides being quite far north, it is also located on a plateau roughly 910–1,520 m (2,990–4,990 ft) above sea level, which contributes to its low temperatures.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sure, I agree with that. If it is underground , and moves sideways, the reservoir it is contained in will get bigger, and over time, the pressure will start building again. Only place to escape the pressure building up over time, is for the oil to make it to the surface.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

If it is contaminated under pressure, it will be forced upward if there is a opening that way, until the pressure has been released.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

Under the right conditions. Inject water, sand and chemicals under high pressure, and as a result oil is created.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

The north is far enough away from the sun, that it freezes. The north is at the center of the circular path that the sun makes above our head. While a place like Australia is directly above the most souther path of the sun, having the sun daily right above it for 3-4 months a year. While the suns most northern path is around Hong Kong in China.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

Could be, have not considered that. Guess I need to look more into how the moon is plasma, and how plasma works.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

Water finds cracks in the sea floor that it move down in; as it get deeper down in the earth, it gets hotter. Once water gets hot enough, it vaporizes, turns to gas form, and becomes less dense then the medium it is surrounded by, and starts coming back up to the surface of the earth. Once it rises, it cools down, and goes back to liquid form. Some of that water finds itself in pockets under ground, under heavy pressure, where it turn into oil. Even though we drill out that oil, these reservoir will refill itself over time, as more water vapor is pushing it self into the now empty reservoir.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

I do not know why things that does not happen, does not happen.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

It knows it based on its density relative to its surroundings.

2
Allas8 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is based on the density of the medium it is surrounded by. The more dense a thing is, and it will go down, if it is less dense then the medium it is surrounded by, it will go up. If an object finds it relative buoyancy level, it will neither move up or down, unless an external force is applied to it.

3
Allas8 3 points ago +3 / -0

Things fall, as they are more dense than the medium they are surrounded by. A example is Helium, which is less dense than air, so instead of falling, it goes upward, until it finds it relative buoyancy level.

Gravity is a theory about how two object attract each other, based on their mass, and it never been proven. As a example electromagnetism (static electricity) is a much stronger force then what they claim gravity is (100.000 times stronger or something like that), and you can not control for if you are detecting electromagnetism or gravity, if running experiments.

(Electromagnetism - the force we know best - is 10 to the 36th power stronger than Gravity. That's 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times stronger!

From google.)

3
Allas8 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you want to prove that the moon is a disk, here is how you do it. Have one person north of the equator, say in Canada, and one person south of the equator, say in Argentina, take a picture of the moon at the same time. Then compare the two images, rotate it, adjust the size, and see if it shows the same surface area of the moon. If the moon is a disk, then you will see the same surface area. If it on the other hand is a ball, one side should be able to view a surface areas that the other side is not able to view.

To demonstrate this principal, you could set up stripped ball, and have two people stand 100 meters away from it, and 3 meters apart from each other, then have them use superzoom camera to take a picture of the stripped ball. They will not take a picture of the same surface area of the stripped ball. If you on the other hand do this with a disk, they will take a picture of the same surface area of the disk.

7
Allas8 7 points ago +7 / -0

The further away you get from the sun, the colder it will get. As it gets colder, water will go from liquid form, to a solid form, also known as ice. Even salt water will turn to ice, once it gets cold enough.

So an ice ring will form around the earth, containing the water, once you get far enough south. This ice ring is known as Antarctica.

4
Allas8 4 points ago +4 / -0

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.flatearthsun&pli=1

The Flat Earth Sun & Moon Clock shows where the sun and moon are across the face of the earth as shown on the AE map. See where your day & night are, position and phase of the moon as the sun laps it every 28 days. Track the seasons as the sun travels between the Tropic of Capricorn and the Tropic of Cancer.

3
Allas8 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fly out to the equator, follow the path of the sun, and you get the absolute fastest trade winds for this flight. Path should go not that far south of Hawaii, and you get to cruise while the wind carries you forward.

2
Allas8 2 points ago +2 / -0

You can verify this yourself by flying from Sydney to Santiago. Flight goes as expected, it is because of jet streams: 100% in line with the flat earth model, and what it predicts.

2
Allas8 2 points ago +2 / -0

We can have a look at what the Bibles preceding the KJV said:

Isaiah 40 Wycliffe Bible (1394)

  1. Which sittith on the cumpas of erthe, and the dwelleris therof ben as locustis; which stretchith forth heuenes as nouyt, and spredith abrood tho as a tabernacle to dwelle.

Isaiah 40 Tyndale Bible (1531)

  1. [It is] he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof [are] as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in:

Isaiah 40 Coverdale Bible (1535)

  1. That he sytteth vpon the Circle of the worlde, and that all the inhabitours of the worlde are in coparison of him, but as greshoppers: That he spredeth out the heaues as a coueringe, that he stretcheth them out, as. a tent to dwell in:

Isaiah 40 Matthew Bible (1537)

  1. That he sytteth vpon the circle of the worlde, and that al the inhabytours of the worlde are in comparison of him, but as greshoppers: That he spredeth out the heauens as a coueryng, that he stretcheth them out, as a tent to dwell in:

Isaiah 40 Geneva Bible (1560)

  1. He sitteth vpon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grashoppers, hee stretcheth out ye heauens, as a curtaine, and spreadeth them out, as a tent to dwell in.

Isaiah 40 Bishops' Bible (1568)

It is he that sitteth vpon the circle of the world, whose inhabiters are [in comparison of him] but as grashoppers: he spreadeth out the heauens as a couering, he stretcheth them out as a tent to dwell in.

They all been translating this as circle. The correct word to use, is circle. Only the Jesuit trained Priest are claiming otherwise.

2
Allas8 2 points ago +2 / -0

And the Douay–Rheims Bible came out in 1610, about the time of the formation of the Jesuit order, and when the Catholic Church started pushing the global model. How long they (Rome) been claiming we live on a ball, I do not know, but we can at least trace it to the Douay–Rheims, as you pointed out.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ezekiel 1

  1. In the fifth day of the moneth, (which was the fifth yeere of king Iehoiakins captiuitie,)

Time when Ezekiel saw his first visions of God. 5th year of Jehoiachin's captivity.

Jeremiah 52

  1. ¶ And it came to passe in the seuen and thirtieth yeere of the captiuitie of Iehoiakin king of Iudah, in the twelfth moneth, in the fiue and twentieth day of the moneth, that Euil-merodach king of Babylon, in the first yeere of his reigne, lifted vp the head of Iehoiakin king of Iudah, and brought him forth out of prison,

In the 37th year of Jehoiachin's captivity, that is 32 years later, Evilmerodach takes over as king of Babylon, after Nebuchad-rezzar.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Latin Bible is corrupt, so I am not surprise that Tyrus is Tyre in Latin. The Bible that King James authorized makes a distinction between Tyrus and Tyre though. Reason you not found some other city named Tyrus, is because it was destroyed, and is currently under the sea, I would say.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

First thing I notice, is that Ezekiel 26 talks about the city of Tyrus as the one that been destroyed forever. The city of Tyre is another city, mentioned in the Bible.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›