4
Ajax23 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hallelujah. We need actions, not reactions.

1
Ajax23 1 point ago +1 / -0

No worries. I will never travel again for recreation and for those who must travel for overseas family reasons they just fulfil the quarantine requirement. Otherwise let them get vaccinated. Lets see how the tourist industry benefits. Our money Their Oxygen

2
Ajax23 2 points ago +2 / -0

We have all been had at some stage. Off the booze, rest and learn for next time. Trust noone but yourself

2
Ajax23 2 points ago +2 / -0

Have a good rest brother. Tomorrow is another day.

2
Ajax23 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think we should all rest tonight and for a Few days

1
Ajax23 1 point ago +3 / -2

Shall I expand on this a bit? I think the same software and machines were used in the 2016 US elections. Think about that

1
Ajax23 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because...what truth? The truth that will get you jailed?

1
Ajax23 1 point ago +1 / -0

Spot on. And guess who will be the real victims of this

4
Ajax23 4 points ago +4 / -0

The untouchables are untouchables.

2
Ajax23 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's mental gymnastics of the highest sort. Learn the reference by heart if argument is done IRL

1
Ajax23 1 point ago +1 / -0

No think about it. They claim there is evidence that masks work. Your claim is that they don't (or that goes for anything else you may claim that has a medical /scientific context). They counter saying there is no evidence for your argument. You KO with said argument and reference linked below.

1
Ajax23 1 point ago +1 / -0

That could only be dealt with by making the site private and allowing invite links only from present users.

3
Ajax23 3 points ago +3 / -0

Have you thought of crowd funding?

3
Ajax23 3 points ago +3 / -0

Willing to support the right coders. Fully agree

2
Ajax23 2 points ago +2 / -0

And to shut them up permanently quote the following from a highly respected medical journal...

Conclusions Parachute use did not reduce death or major traumatic injury when jumping from aircraft in the first randomized evaluation of this intervention. However, the trial was only able to enroll participants on small stationary aircraft on the ground, suggesting cautious extrapolation to high altitude jumps. When beliefs regarding the effectiveness of an intervention exist in the community, randomized trials might selectively enroll individuals with a lower perceived likelihood of benefit, thus diminishing the applicability of the results to clinical practice.

https://www.bmj.com/content/363/bmj.k5094

2
Ajax23 2 points ago +2 / -0

Peeps. It's not good to be call him a shill. He maybe but... can we explain what these are? When was this taken? Is this from the White House? Basic question...

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›