2
Agent777 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh thank God! Now I can finally access the government from anywhere and everywhere I go 24/7. That has been my dream since I do t know how long?!

2
Agent777 2 points ago +2 / -0

When I quit smoking I have to say that certain things cleared up as far as my health goes. I had had something like walking pnemonia for about a year, constantly coughing. Was likely a fungal infection I aquired harvesting bat guano from a bat cave type thing. Also had inflamed gums. Both of those cleared up within two weeks of my last smoke.

But to my surprise my body fell apart when I quit smoking. Seems like everything started going wrong. It really surprised me. I imagined I would start becoming really healthy but instead all sort of shit went wrong.

It has led me to believe that nicotine was maybe doing something good for me besides synthesizing the sensation of being satisfied it might have done other beneficial things.

Nicotine is actually found in many vegetables like brocollii. Not in very high concentrations, but if you eat lots of veggies like you should you are undoubtedly ingesting nicotine regularly.

3
Agent777 3 points ago +3 / -0

It could be that they are trying to get people to adopt and identify with the term 'vaccine hesitant' in order to make them less firm in their decision sub consciously. Sort of like making affirmations.

1
Agent777 1 point ago +1 / -0

I will say it would not surprise me if it turned out to be a hoax, and that the numbers of infections were infact due to vaccinations. In that case the statistics still could be true that the infection rates were highest in areas with lots of Trump supporters because some polls show that it is NOT trump supporters who are declining vaccination but is actually people who consider themselves independents, or apolitical (myself included in that group. That to me seems very plausible because in the past when it comes to vaccinating children it was statistically educated and somewhat well to do liberal women who did not want to vaccinate their children as opposed to republicans.

Here's an article about that: https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/05/09/politics/vaccine-hesitant-analysis/index.html

I realize it's CNN but there is a link to the actual kaiser family poll that was not a cnn poll. The link is for a pdf download.

Seems like that pill could be accurate. I think most of the trump supporters at .win forums would not get vaccinated, but most trump supporters don't exactly share the views of the people in these forums, and Trump himself pushes the vax and urges his supporters to take the shots saying it has saved the world. So it could be that many of those regions where people are getting sick are trump regions, but they are actually due to the vax.

If you live in a rural area I would not expect your hospital to be packed due to low population density in rural areas.


However there is lots of evidence that the virus exists and I tend to think that it does. The virus has been isolated according to tons of data out there. They have sequenced its genetic material and even have actual pictures thanks to electron microscopy.

I do think that the test that they use have blown up the numbers with false positives and mis classifying the flu or cold as covid, but I tend to think they used a real virus, because: When people create things and have them at their disposal they tend to want to use them, and also because I believe they have an agenda and it might require a virus that potentially bad, but for all practical purposes was not that bad. Theren is a few reasons or possibilities that would be dependant on that for that. It could be how this virus will affect the vaccinated in the future, orbit could be how it affects the unvaccinated after a variant arises in the vaccinated population

The symptoms are similar to the flu, (but donate other coronaviruses like the cold, sars1, and mers), but different. The flu does not cause loss of taste or smell, and the flu effects children where as children do not get covid also the numbers and season of infection do not add up.

They create viruses like this all over the world. All the time. They have no reason NOT to use a real virus for their agenda.

But again, until I see how the agenda unfolds I am open minded about the possibility that it could be a total fake.

Do you think that SARS, and MERS were fake/did not exist and we're never isolated?

4
Agent777 4 points ago +4 / -0

I totally agree, and I have felt the same way for YEARS about the word refuse, as in "refusing vaccination". It's designed to.make it seem like an act of defiance.

However in defense of the author of the article:

"The researchers analysed more than 5 million survey responses by a range of different demographic details, and classed those people who would “probably” or “definitely” not choose to get vaccinated as “vaccine hesitant.”"

And

" found that in the first five months of 2021, the largest decrease in hesitancy was among the least educated — those with a high school education or less."

The people with minimal education who did not want to get vaccinated at the begining but eventually did were by definition, hesitant.

People who would definitely not are not hesitant but people who would probably not are hesitant. The article says both groups were classified as hesitant by the researchers.so that is why they use the term in the article.

And again in defense of the article :

"So not only are the most educated people most sceptical of taking the Covid vaccine, they are also the least likely the change their minds about it… " ie, NOT hesitant, but instead firm in their decision.

by pkvi
1
Agent777 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you know the difference between governing, and guidance?

I would say the guidances are to start the survivors away from the general causes of problems I. The world, or at least how whoever made them saw it, so that the world would not go right back to where it is now.

Whether I think it is worthwhile or the right guidance is not what I'm arguing, just that none of it seems like NWO ideology.

by pkvi
2
Agent777 2 points ago +2 / -0

Did they make DC a state yet?

4
Agent777 4 points ago +4 / -0

She used a paramecium emoji to represent a coronavirus and just kept getting stupider to her very last words.

by pkvi
0
Agent777 0 points ago +1 / -1

I think that's exactly what they are.

You can say that "maintain the population at 500,000,000" means murder 7.5 billion, but I think more likely that it is a reference to a cataclysm.

If you look at all of the other guidances engraved on the stones it's difficult to see how those relate to the NWO

One of them even says not to have a bunch of useless officials, meanwhile the NWO wants someone checking for vaccine passports.

Not having a bunch of useless officials means leaving people free to move about at liberty.

If it didn't say to maintain that population no one would ever have thought it was a NWO because none of those other things listed represents their ideology. Like I pointed out, some of them directly oppose NWO ideology

1
Agent777 1 point ago +1 / -0

Here is a study where they looked at ten years of medical records of the patients at four physicians offices.

Side by side comparison of vaxxed vs unvaxxed

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2050312120925344

5
Agent777 5 points ago +5 / -0

Keep in mind, she wasnt even talking about covid vaccines. That was for the regular vaccines.

They did a study very recently comparing vaxxed to unvaxxed people. It was published in 2020 just as covid was rolling out so it was burried.

Normally when doing saftey trials on vaccines, they use another vaccine instead of a placebo in the control group. That is common procedure for vaccine trials. They do that because they say if they used saline for a placebo it would "unblind" the trial study because without a reaction in the arm (that only happens to some people) the placebo group would know they had the placebo . That's BS but what ever.

Then they say that it would not be fair to do a study against vaxxed vs unvaxxed people because there would be a moral obligation to vaccinate the unvaxxed group. To keep them unvaccinated would be ethically wrong. More BS, but that's what they say which is obviously quite presumptuous as far as vaccine saftey and effeciacy concerned considering they haven't proven any of it.

So what they did in the recent study was to look at medical records from four physicians offices.

They looked at vaxxed and in vaxxed records from each offic. Compared the vaxxed vs un vaxxed over 10 years

They found that over all the vaxxed group was considerably LESS healthy than the unvaxxed group. There were much higher incidences of all sorts of things from asthma and earaches to ADD and autoimmune issues to neurological problems.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2050312120925344

by pkvi
3
Agent777 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is the influencer they hired to convince the remains people who are still vaccine hesitant. That would be the people in arkansas, rednecks, the blacks and Hispanics, and conservatives and trump supporters. Do you really think this guy wields much influence over those social groups?

1
Agent777 1 point ago +1 / -0

I looked up the MSDS the other day and noticed the same thing.

The amounts of the proprieties you'd have to take to kill your self is more than is in the tube. Ivermectin is definitely the most dangerous ingredient, but the amounts you'd have to take of that is also pretty high.

1
Agent777 1 point ago +1 / -0

It starts with passports. I'd you want to use your logic to say that it started with lockdowns you could say it started with laws, or with govt having power to.make.laws etc.

The passports will quickly evolve.intonthe first act of compliance that gets them access to your body. The entire pandemic is simply for the passports.

The lockdowns the vaccine, everything is for the passports

1
Agent777 1 point ago +1 / -0

California mandated several vaccines for all children, even homeschool d children with No exemptions except drs recommendation. Then they began coming down hard on doctors who wrote exemptions. This was in 2018. .this was after SB 51 in 2016 where they mandated for all kids in public and private schools no exemptions when the governor proclaimed the lie that "the science is clear" to imply that science suggested everyone should be vaxxed.

1
Agent777 1 point ago +1 / -0

Passports for one thing. Those passports aren't going to end with phone apps though. First they talk about how paper passports are not good enough so they have an app, but the app is too easy to hack according to recent news stories. It's just as easy tomforge as the paper card. Next will be when everyone gets a booster an invisible mark will be given at the exact same time that will be able to be scanned to affirm your status as vaccinated.

That is step one, the month invasive benign mark that will get people used to the idea of the system having access to your body/you being a component of the system as opposed to being your own autonomous entity. That along with biometric ID will.make implementing chipping etc. a much simpler thing in the next few years.

1
Agent777 1 point ago +1 / -0

In 2018 a friend of mine and I discussed the same scenario playing out. We talked about NWO ordering a vaccine that you would have to go get yourself. We talked about how without it you would be denied access to work, stores etc. We were talking about how it would be wise to ha be e a large sustenance garden and to aim for self sufficiency in order to hold our own in the face of that event.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›