Just fucking deport this shill
He retorted with nonsense all day yesterday
Ignoring my basic simple evidence and then says "muh retard flat earthers never have evidence"
Answered every one of his questions with evidence
Just personal attacks
They're either a shill or brain dead
Now listen, I fully believe there are prop white houses that he’s using
I also could fully believe anyone who claimed that is one of those projectors you shine on your house
I would have a hard time refuting that if someone told me it was a decorative projector
nixon call to the apollo actors
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ai_HCBDQIQ&t=3s
no wonder they consider us cattle
Ask yourself why the condescending tone and personal attacks
Disappointing
I did exceptionally well in school, particularly in math and science
" Why don't you google it for fuck sake? "
I'm pointing this contradiction out to you and you told me to google it
Why does the force that pulls every single other atom around in perfect harmony ignore the bullet? This should give you pause
https://www.bitchute.com/video/QImI7ys7tYss/
Skip to 40:00 for the boat over the water brought back into view with optical zoom
At some point you will be limited by the density of the atmosphere itself, no matter your optical power
" This has zero to do with a ship sailing over the horizon "
I'm giving you a simple and common example of the Law of Perspective, to help illustrate the phenomena for you
" The horizon always appears perfectly flat 360 degrees around the observer regardless of altitude "
The horizon appears the same degree of flat no matter the altitude, is what they mean
When you look straight out at the horizon, the sides will appear to curve a bit and this is due to the limits of your sight
Assume you can see exactly 30 kms from your point of view
This would create a circle of observation for you, which would look like a slight curve from your perspective
If it were perfectly flat, that would mean your area of observation would be a square which would also mean you can see further in some directions than others, which isn't the case
This is also covered in the Law of Perspective subject
So much of your questions all answered with one very true and easily verifiable well known fact, the Law of Perspective
https://www.bitchute.com/video/m0QBxL9NLtb4/
1:40 to 10:00 boat after boat brought back into view with zoom
Keep watching for a breakdown of the Law of Perspective
Ask yourself why the condescending tone and personal attacks
Disappointing
I did exceptionally well in school, particularly in math and science
" Why don't you google it for fuck sake? "
I'm pointing this contradiction out to you and you told me to google it
Why does the force that pulls every single other atom around in perfect harmony ignore the bullet? This should give you pause
https://www.bitchute.com/video/QImI7ys7tYss/
Skip to 40:00 for the boat over the water brought back into view with optical zoom
At some point you will be limited by the density of the atmosphere itself, no matter your optical power
" This has zero to do with a ship sailing over the horizon "
I'm giving you a simple and common example of the Law of Perspective, to help illustrate the phenomena for you
" The horizon always appears perfectly flat 360 degrees around the observer regardless of altitude "
The horizon appears the same degree of flat no matter the altitude, is what they mean
When you look straight out at the horizon, the sides will appear to curve a bit and this is due to the limits of your sight
Assume you can see exactly 30 kms from your point of view
This would create a circle of observation for you, which would look like a slight curve from your perspective
If it were perfectly flat, that would mean your area of observation would be a square which would also mean you can see further in some directions than others, which isn't the case
This is also covered in the Law of Perspective subject
So much of your questions all answered with one very true and easily verifiable well known fact, the Law of Perspective
https://www.bitchute.com/video/m0QBxL9NLtb4/
1:40 to 10:00 boat after boat brought back into view with zoom
Keep watching for a breakdown of the Law of Perspective
I'm not trying to spam the communities with this, but in case you missed my comments earlier:
You can prove the globe wrong yourself without special equipment
Do you live near a large body of water? You can still do this over land but I would then encourage you to do this experiment in a few different locations to rule out the possibility of your land samples all being coincidentally flat
Ideally, you stand on a shoreline and scan up the coast or directly across the water if possible and spot the most distant object/landmark
On a clear day and assuming 20/20 vision you will be able to see over 25 kms with your naked eye. Bring binoculars to go much further and give yourself zero room for doubt
Pay attention to what you’re seeing. Notice that you not only see the entire landmark but also even the ground and shoreline running up to it
Then hit google maps and right click your location, measure distance, right click again on your distant landmark(s) and measure distance
Enter that distance into an earth curvature calculator
Earthcurvature.com
Why can you still see 100% of that distant object that should be completely obscured from view due to earths supposed curvature?
There's no other way to interpret what your are seeing with your own eyes
Seriously, do yourself a favour and go do this sometime
ericdubay.com
flatearth101.com
Well I hadn’t read your comment yet so I haven’t had the chance to answer your questions
Calm down for a second and I’ll explain for you
“The jet is like a ball being thrown up in the air. EVERYTHING is spinning through space together “
Then why must the sniper account for the spin of the earth? If some force is pulling every air water and solid molecule together in such perfect harmony that we don’t even sense it, then why does this magical force ignore the snipers bullet?
“What is your IQ? Are you that much of a dumb ass that you can't understand why you can't see the bottom of things like buildings or ships at the horizon?”
This is the law of perspective
You can bring the boat that has disappeared back into view with optical zoom
At some point you are limited by the density of our atmosphere itself, no matter your optical power
“ If you look at a mountain far far away, you will never see the very bottom - why? If the earth is flat you would see the foothills of all mountains. You would not see a ship disappear over the horizon.”
More of the same thing; law of perspective
Like looking down a very long hotel hallway. The floor rises and the ceiling drops until they meet somewhere down the hallway and create the same thing as our horizon
We of course know the hallway isn’t shrinking
Same thing is the streetlights lining the road
Looking at it, it looks like the streetlights get shorter but they are all the same size
I’d answer more of your basic FE questions but there are content creators who have already done a much better job of this
Check out OddTV’s “flat earth in 5 minutes” video, found via flatearth101.com
Plenty of resources on there and a FAQ video that will answer the top 20 questions or whatever
Ericdubay.com has everything you could need to understand the flat earth model
He has a lot of other content that I haven’t checked out, that isn’t FE related, but he has all of the content sorted by topic
Easy to navigate
I didn’t pick up on a great explanation as to why I’m looking at a distant object that should be entirely obscured from view due to earths supposed curvature
Mind elaborating?
They shill against flat earth more than anything, I find
Once FE goes mainstream, it’s going to devastate their house of cards
Their pillars are already crumbling all at once
It’s going to be stormy but will be incredible on the other side
❤️
Forget someone else’s nonsense “proof”
You can prove the globe wrong yourself without special equipment
Do you live near a large body of water? You can still do this over land but I would then encourage you to do this experiment in a few different locations to rule out the possibility of your land samples all being coincidentally flat
Ideally, you stand on a shoreline and scan up the coast or directly across the water if possible and spot the most distant object/landmark
On a clear day you should likely be able to see over 20/25 kms with your naked eye. Bring binoculars to go much further and give yourself zero room for doubt.
Pay attention to what you’re seeing. Notice that you not only see the entire landmark but also even the ground and shoreline running up to it
Then hit google maps and right click your location, measure distance, right click again on your distant landmark(s) and measure distance
Enter that distance into an earth curvature calculator
Earthcurvature.com
Why can you still see 100% of that distant object that should be completely obscured from view due to earths supposed curvature?
I'm not sure yet what you mean or why it matters but I'm interested, if you could please elaborate?
In case we don't come to agreement on the Coriolis effect problem, I encourage you to experiment the distant landmark example for yourself sometime
No theory or physics involved, really
Just some trigonometry
Measure distance between yourself and the distant object using Google Maps and then punch the distance into an earth curvature calculator to get the amount of curve or drop there should be
At 25kms, easily visible with the naked eye, there should already be appx 150ft of drop, meaning anything shorter than 150ft would be 100% blocked from view
You'll instead find that you're staring at 100% of the distant landmark; zero drop
We have examples much further than this were the object should be blocked by an entire mile of earth
At some point you will be limited due to the atmosphere, regardless of your optical zoom
Bring binoculars if you have them
I’m not claiming that objects don’t disappear behind the horizon
The Law of Perspective is real; I would never contest this
Next time you’re about to set sail, take a peek at the furthest distant object/landmark you can view
Should easily see over 20kms with naked eye but bring optics to really leave yourself zero room for doubt
Even at 25kms there should be appx 150ft of drop
Bring a veteran sailor you probably already know that one can see much further than 25kms over the water on a clear day
We have countless examples of much further distant objects than 25kms
Lighthouses, all over the place, provide proof that it’s not the globe with radius of 3959mi as claimed and then the other plethora of evidence to debunk the spinning lie
Calculate your distance between your point of reference on the shoreline and your distant landmark using google maps
Right click, measure distance
Punch that into the earth curve calculator
Go see for yourself, it’s the only way you’ll believe it
Insults have no effect on me, my love
I encourage you to consider these two points
There is nothing “LowIQ” about viewing a distant object, measuring distance between object and reference point, then punching the distance into any of the earth curvature calculators freely available online
earthcurvature.com provides the formula in case you’d like to ensure that variable is accurate
This cannot be spun or shilled
If you 100% disagree with me, mind pointing out why the Coriolis effect contradiction doesn't give you pause?
Also, how can you disagree with someone standing on a shoreline staring at a distant object/landmark 100% visible that should be completely obscured from view?
"There must be an explanation"
"Impossible that this could be kept a secret"
Ignore your brain's cognitive dissonance for a few minutes and truly consider those two points as I've described
I'm very interested in having a proper discussion about it
No one has been able to properly refute the claim, which makes sense, because it's Truth that cannot be shilled or spun
right, and I replied to you asking for a link to where I was "BTFO" and you didn't get back to me
I expect you were referring to someone else's comment about the bullet not being self-powered and able to change its course like the helicopter, airplane, hot air balloon, or bird
I then reminded you that it's 1000mph spin at the equator and none of those things take that into consideration
There's a lot more I can go on about; more evidence to debunk the spinning globe lie but these two points are enough on their own and can be experimented by anyone, anywhere
haha I love you, handshake
Consider the Coriolis effect contradiction and the visible distant landmark impossibility described in my other comment
Either of those two points should be enough to give pause, and I can provide plenty of other evidence to debunk the spinning globe claim, upon request
earthcurvature.com
You can calculate how much curve there should be over a given distance. This one requires a large body of water to test out, as a long stretch of land, however unlikely, COULD be flat and so I wouldn't want to rely on that for proof
You could test over land in a few different locations to significantly reduce the possibility that you are sampling over a large flat parcel of land every time, however unlikely that would be
We know water finds and maintains its level
What you want to do is stand on the coastline and spot a distant landmark; the further the better
Bring binoculars if you have them, really give yourself little room for doubt
With the naked eye on a clear day you should likely be able to see much further than 20 kms, easily
Even at 20kms you should be seeing about 95 feet of drop, meaning, anything shorter than 95 ft should be completely obstructed from view due to the curve of the earth
You can hit Google Maps and right click the screen to measure distance from a starting location to your landmarks you spotted
You will find that you can see the entire distant landmark 20kms away, the entire thing and even the ground running up to it
Zero curve, let alone the 100ft of drop there should be at that distance
Try another location and in a different direction, if you still aren't convinced
The second other easy one, would be the Coriolis effect which we have all heard of
The sniper that must account for the spin of the Earth (appx 1000mph at the equator, reducing in speed as you get further from the equator)
We all accept this as accurate. They've made movies about it.
Ask yourself why this same principle does not apply to airplanes, helicopters, hot air balloons or even birds
Those two examples should be more than enough evidence to blow holes through the spinning globe with a radius of 3959mi falsehood
Why would they do this? How could they possibly pull it off? And the other questions that you will be defending the globe lie with in your head
Skip all of that for now and focus on the two examples I gave
They contradict the foundation of the globe lie
Just pause and look at it, I promise I do not mean to mislead you
♥
It's stealing tens of billions of dollars from the american taxpayer every year
One of the many thefts of the american taxpayer
Did anyone vote to send billions to Israel each year?
"The military costs trillions to function each year"
Mmmhmmm