why bother. a mileswmathis article.
(mileswmathis.com)
Comments (5)
sorted by:
why bother truth telling.
https://mileswmathis.com/resist.pdf
Note: OP link is a 3 page PDF
Nature implies singularity for each native unit within...consenting to the suggested artifice by one another establishes pluralism, which BOTHERS one with BOTH (natural and artificial). That's why.
Resistance implies each ones responding (re) stance aka the body private as opposed to the body politic, which represents the temptation of publicity.
Aka the want to hold onto tempting one to ignore the need to let go of...the faust (fist) -ian deal.
All (cause) dividing internally into each thing (effect)...that's how temptation (inception towards death) generates resistance (life). Yet...there cannot be anything new among each different thing within the same cause.
It's affection (likeness) which tempts effect (difference) to ignore cause (sameness)...it's those who are distracted by likeness who perceive differences as "new".
Those fatballs represent appetite aka the craving for food (want) tempting one to ignore hunger (need).
It's pluralism (they) which disables singularity (one) if consented to.
Register/reg - "to move in a straight line"...nothing implies ones denial of being (life) moved within a straight line (inception towards death) of everything moving each thing within apart from one another.
It's trying to tempt one another to register (enter into public record) which "reg-edits" one.
It's the opposite...nothingness aka denial tempts one to sink under the self inflicted burden (suggested information) instead of rising out of relief (perceivable inspiration).
Miles tries to put more suggested information onto those who are already overburdened under the rubbish they choose to hold onto.
Psycho (animating power) logy (circular logic)...it's circular logic applied to suggested artifice which prevents one from the natural power of animation, which cannot be held onto since it moves.
Psycho implies the natural passage; logy implies a self imposed artificial impasse.
There can be only one direction (inception towards death) for each one within (life), which direction one misses, when utilizing "circular" logic.
If one runs in circles, then how does one notice being moved within a straight line?
Action implies all of nature; inter-action implies each natives reaction internal within all of natural action. A human cannot act; only react. Interaction isn't about reacting to one another, but being the internal reaction of action.
Because suggested pluralism (they) tempts perceiving specific (one) to fall into the trap of generalizing differences together (synthesis) instead of setting differences apart (analysis).
Nature never shuts down the analytic process of internal division...it's each native who shuts oneself down by joining synthesis with each other.
Because pluralism (they) tempts singularity (one) into likeness with one another.
Because your story contradicts what they already stored...storing (possessing) contradicts running (processing).
How does one enter a store? By going through an EN-TRANCE, hence putting self within (en) transfer (trance) aka a transubstantiation of memory by his-story or your story.
The process cannot be stopped and pain starts at inception and ends at death for each processed life within.
Well that was infuriatingly pointless. It was just a kid who can't write having a mental health crisis, but worse still, he dedicated multiple paragraphs to telling us how unbelievably interesting his life is and then didn't tell us a single thing about it.
FTFY.