nukes are fake. oppenheimer bbc doc.
(m.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
Then, all NPPs are fake too.
I want to see at least consistency in every theory. If there is no consistency in theory, then, it's not a theory, it is just a bullshit.
Sso where I could find the same amount of videos, posts and threads about how fake NPPs are, and how exactly they are faked.
These conspiracies are never consistent. They aren't even supported by anything. The link is a BBC documentary about Oppenheimer's later life promoting nuclear nonproliferation (unsuccessfully). How this is evidence that nukes are fake is not specified.
To be honest, it is theoretically possible that the power plants are real while the bomsbs are fake. But it seems kind of silly if this were the case, because then we are saying NPPs exist but no one ever used the technology to build a bomb. On the other hand, if NPPs are fake too, then that is one elaborate conspiracy. NPPs are not everywhere, but they are a lot more places and involve a lot more people than the bombs. At least people can say "well how many people have actually seen a nuclear bomb?" and be sort of right.
There is a somewhat more believable conspiracy that nuclear radiation is less harmful than promoted by the official sources of info. I have no real opinion on that because I have no first hand knowledge.
There is no way nuclear science is fake and I won't even hear it. Only FE tier people believe that sort of thing. So, given that, the energy numbers can be assumed correct. The only real question is whether we can harness it for various devices.
If nothing else, the effects of nuclear radiation is less predictable than promoted by official sources.
A lot of it is how your body deals with cell repair and dna error checking, and that is not homogenous across everyone.
There was a video circulating on the internet a while ago of some guy who was supposedly a scientist on the Manhattan project saying that nuclear radiation is less harmful than the authorities let on. I am not sure if this is true or not. I guess it would be interesting if it is, but I sort of don't care, because radiation does cause cancer and whatever. It may just be that it occurs at lower rates than we are told.
So I distinguish between that sort of conspiracy, that nukes are actually less harmful in a long term fashion (fallout, etc.) than we are told, with the ones that say they either don't exist at all or work vastly differently (i.e. the explosions are smaller). The "nukes aren't real" ones generally come from the same places that have claimed to have "falsified the radius" (of the earth). They have not, so I won't be taking their advice about the safety of nuclear radiation.
They deny all their fears, which makes it hard to take them at face value. Space is scary, ok there's no space. The depths of the earth are creepy so earth has no depth. Scared of disease, germs are fake. Scared of nukes, uranium is a hoax.
There's no argument, just denial of things that are frightening. Like ostriches, in a way.
keywords "nuke hoax" or "nuclear hoax".
https://www.unbekoming.com/p/death-object-exploding-the-nuclear
soldiers stacked TNT to fake trinity. book by japanese author on how hiroshima nagasaki were firebombed.
nuke-lies. fakeologist.
wtc corona apollo fake. nukes too.
US is not the only country in the world. It is not even largest, most populated or oldest. It is just one of many countries.
If US faked their nukes, it is only US problem and I don't really care about it.
Also, links to somebody web pages or someones vidoes are not proofs of anything, if you are not aware.
I don't care about videos from internet. I just know how things work.