So Bern forwarded the idea that humanity should be given stock in a.i. because they are literally sharpening the tip of the spear of capitalism with a.i. and a.i. is made of us. A body for our doppleganger if you will(and other beings). And since it is made literally from input from us why should we not profit. Although this will NEVER happen(capitalists would just move juristictions)this give people a new perspective on a.i. for people to think about.
Comments (11)
sorted by:
Agreed
That would be cool.
Reason implies a circular conflict (like vs dislike; more vs less etc.) which distracts one (life) from delineation (inception towards death) aka ones lifeline.
Banning implies speaking publicly... https://www.etymonline.com/word/ban AI regurgitates speech back to the public through private filters.
A jew shaped the world wide web to summon gentiles into a public speech consensus, which after crawling enough information from the public is now being privatized.
The Bern is selling it to the leftist and Trump is selling it to the maga crowd. "Clowns to the left of me, jokers to right, here I am stuck in the middle with you". Some songs are classics for a reason, and most people will never understand them
May as well groove as society collapses..
The literal opposite is happening: companies are being forced to use AI to keep up, but tokens are expensive.
So, now AI is trading tokens in exchange for equity in the customer's company.
The businesses that don't use AI are developing slower, and those who are using AI are becoming the property of the AI companies.
Soon, every new and successful company will be owned primarily by AI. You will own nothing and...
Ok but that's not the point of the post.
The point is "is at least some of humanity adapting a new perspective?".
I guess so.
One thing, as we put more AI- generated content online, new models being trained that rely on webscraping will get more and more skewed/burned/overtuned.
In the end, the noise will overtake the information and we'll get convergence:
Why do all random graphs end up identical
Pretty sure a.i. is just the data collection(as pertains to us. As far as pertains to the overlords...sky is the limit
A jew shapes artificial speech to tempt gentiles into becoming stock/stuck during natural generation.
Aka circumcision.
Nature gives...a jew suggests idealism to tempt gentiles to take part in it which implies getting stuck/stock to idolatry.
US (united states) implies AI (artificial speech within generation)...natural generation divides each state apart from one another; artificial speech unites states together.
a) Consenting to any suggestion establishes the body public, which distracts ones perception from being the body private. Holding onto any suggestion of another ONE, while ignoring ONEs perception implies double aka one + one.
b) Gang; noun - "a going, journey, way, passage"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/gang That's nature passing each living being from inception towards death.
a) It (consensus) is made from input (consent) by ONE into US aka artifically joining together what nature sets apart from one another.
b) Pro (forth) fit (to set) implies nature setting forth being...not a jew tempting gentiles to use consent to set forth artificial consensus within nature.
The more artificial consensus gentiles build...the less gentiles profit from nature.
Whatever a gentile consents to as to get PROFIT was shaped by a jewish PROPHET...
Only nature gives each person a body private...a jew tempts gentiles together into a body public (people) by inverting natural perspective (now) with artificial perspective (new).
"The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no NEW thing under the sun." ~Ecclesiastes 1:9