So Bern forwarded the idea that humanity should be given stock in a.i. because they are literally sharpening the tip of the spear of capitalism with a.i. and a.i. is made of us. A body for our doppleganger if you will(and other beings). And since it is made literally from input from us why should we not profit. Although this will NEVER happen(capitalists would just move juristictions)this give people a new perspective on a.i. for people to think about.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (11)
sorted by:
Reason implies a circular conflict (like vs dislike; more vs less etc.) which distracts one (life) from delineation (inception towards death) aka ones lifeline.
Banning implies speaking publicly... https://www.etymonline.com/word/ban AI regurgitates speech back to the public through private filters.
A jew shaped the world wide web to summon gentiles into a public speech consensus, which after crawling enough information from the public is now being privatized.