Alright,
So if you’ve been using the internet since the auts, you understand the underlying issues surrounding the “dead internet theory,” AI is generating 50%+ of all content, the “Big 4” (Meta, Google, Apple, Amazon) or however many, funneling content into ecospheres and walled gardens, etc.
The internet was once a fun place with many websites to visit daily and get new, fresh perspectives.
I used to enjoy sites like ign, gamespot, and many low budget websites ran by a devoted webmaster/mod.
Every website now is garbage. Ign and gamespot have so many ads your browser crashes. Then, the content is pure slop— AI generated, or low-effort. Next, it’s pure paid advertising posing as gaming journalism, as in the case of MIXTAPE scandal.
I used to enjoy the internet, but i stopped using facebook, insta, snap, google, in 2020 and never signed up for tik tok.
So, what i’m asking this small conspiracy minded community is—- where’s the good shit?
Any sites you visit on a daily basis with good stuff? Any substacks or telegram channels worth following?
I follow whitney webb, and james corbett… But anyone NOT uploading to youtube or out there on the mainstream sites? Any good foreign language news or info with english subs or dubs?
Most conspiracy shit is propaganda now, or self-serving like alex jones and his boner pills. I’m looking for autist level enthusiasts out there doing shit for the love of the game and risking it all for no reason….
But i’m looking for more.
I really like ArtChad on youtube.
Really, anything you got. Hit me.
A jew blows up an artificial circle (inflation vs deflation) to distract gentiles from natural delineation (inception > life > death)
That's a gentiles mind on jewish inflation.
That's a gentiles mind on jewish deflation.
If a gentile follows natural delineation (inception > life > death); then bye bye gentile.
If a gentile follows artificial circles (inflation vs deflation); then after the burst...the next bubble gets blown up.
what exacrly is this natural path of inception life death?
a) The ACT (inception towards death) which EX-tracts reaction (life).
Misusing the word "exact" as a measure for accuracy or preciseness tempts ones mind to ignore the implied motion of ex (out) agere (to set in motion; drive forward)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/exact Without ignorance ones mind can discern self as coming out of motion.
b) A path implies "a narrow passageway or route across"...all of nature (cause) narrows itself down to each native (effect) being moved across aka a transference (life) from beginning (inception) towards end (death).
What's artificial is mentally (ideal) or physically (idol) choosing to hold onto anything while ignoring motion. For example...nature moves sound; which one ignores when holding onto artificial words to describe anything within sound.
The articulation of words within natural sound represents spell-craft, and while natural sound transfers through each being; articulation tempts the sharing and carrying across of words held within memory...representing the self inflicted burden of sin/syn (together with, jointly; alike).
c) Motion (inception towards death) WAS perceivable before matter (life) can suggest what it IS...consenting to the latter tempts one to ignore the former.
thanls man but this is still too abstract for me to understand. i feeñ it has a valid meaning but how to i use it in practice to escape the artificial trap?
a) Still implies "motionless"...I described motion; you chose to view it as motionless. You are doing this willingly to yourself and so only your will can let go of the motionless view of motion.
b) Ab (away from) stract (to draw). Instead of drawing away from motion as I did when describing how motion works...you only view my description as drawn upon a motion you ignore.
For you the words "inception towards death" represent a script aka a written document (dock-your-mind). I try to describe the process which moves through the potential of life. It's this process which you need to abstract from (perceivable inspiration)...not my description thereof (suggested information).
FOR + TO implies natural; ME + UNDERSTAND implies artificial...only if you choose to let go of self and the want to stand-under another will you discern being "forwarded towards".
It doesn't. You choose to draw validity from meaning suggested to you. Meaning/mean/men (to think) implies either by natural impulse (perception) or artificial impulse (suggestion)...depending on your free will of choice.
Natural validity implies the force of nature moving through each being; artificial validity implies legal bondage to another being.
The bankers issuing currency become the source of validation for any price you buy and sell for...if you consent to the suggested currency.
You don't need validation from anyone...nature implies validation of being; being implies adaption to being validated by nature.
It (nature) uses you (being)...you adapt to being used by it OR be abused by others depending on your free will of choice.
Practice; verb - "to follow or employ a course of action"...if employee (life) follows course of action (inception towards death); then employee dies faster.
The opposite of practice implies alteration...that's what free will of choice does unless willingly ignored.
If TO implies "towards"; then life being moved from inception TOWARDS death doesn't allow escape from outcome. Inception sentences life towards point of death. Living implies a death sentence giving life sentience.
Few suggest escapism to confine the minds of consenting many within ignorance aka denial of being moved. Life after death tricks the mind to ignore living within process of dying. The issue...the living mind has to hold onto the trick, while the process of dying exponentially draws away the living power to hold onto unless life resists.
Ignoring to be free traps one artificially. Whatever you hold onto mentally (ideal) or physically (idol) by free will of choice traps you artificially. Natures motion gives you free will of choice, while taking away any artificial traps you hold onto. The issue...how long will you choose to hold onto the artifice while ignoring natures motion?