I thought that pollen was actually getting into your sinuses and effecting the endocrine system.
So i guess the "smell" of meat implies the particles of meat are actually getting into the sinus cavity therefore reacting with whatever poison Bill Gates' ticks put in your blood?
Last time they came up with something this, ahem, retarded, the Bible disproved it right away for me, ca. March 2020, namely Lev. 13:45. The sick cover their mouths, which means the healthy don't have to.
Let's see how the Bible disproves this one. Hmm, the presenting claim is: "You killed me by mixing my weak constitution, for which I'm not responsible, with a wafted byproduct of what would otherwise be your right to engage publicly; therefore everyone's right to eat normally is negated by my right to your consideration." The answer should come in the form of defining reasonable and unreasonable accommodation.
Ah yes, it's 1 Cor. 10:25-26: "Whatsoever is sold in the shambles, that eat, asking no question for conscience sake: for the earth is the Lord's, and the fulness thereof." Because grilling is commonly done in society without ill consequence or medical reaction, it can be assumed it need not force a special accommodation. If someone says it's a matter of conscience, where there would have to be reasonable proof that smell kills, then you could make an argument to abstain when you know such a person is around. But that would need (1) cooption of medicine to invent an illness where significant rights (eating) can be trampled at the mercy of unlikely, unproven theory, and (2) sheeple society that believe self-destructive altruism toward a person who may not exist is better morals than one's obvious duties to oneself and one's family and neighbors who do exist. And it wouldn't affect private property without further transmission theory.
If people really could die of smelling something, we'd be accumulating death certificates where the diagnosis was allergic reaction to ordinarily occurring airborne phenomena. Yes, if you think peanuts or mayonnaise will inflame you, I'll politely not engage in those nearby you, but you don't run my life. A quick check shows this is almost entirely due to actual ingestion with no deaths blamed on simple scent. Peanuts have dust, but grilling doesn't produce airborne dust AFAIK. So I don't think what you smell will kill you, and again natural evils have their natural limit.
I thought that pollen was actually getting into your sinuses and effecting the endocrine system.
So i guess the "smell" of meat implies the particles of meat are actually getting into the sinus cavity therefore reacting with whatever poison Bill Gates' ticks put in your blood?
Yep.
Last time they came up with something this, ahem, retarded, the Bible disproved it right away for me, ca. March 2020, namely Lev. 13:45. The sick cover their mouths, which means the healthy don't have to.
Let's see how the Bible disproves this one. Hmm, the presenting claim is: "You killed me by mixing my weak constitution, for which I'm not responsible, with a wafted byproduct of what would otherwise be your right to engage publicly; therefore everyone's right to eat normally is negated by my right to your consideration." The answer should come in the form of defining reasonable and unreasonable accommodation.
Ah yes, it's 1 Cor. 10:25-26: "Whatsoever is sold in the shambles, that eat, asking no question for conscience sake: for the earth is the Lord's, and the fulness thereof." Because grilling is commonly done in society without ill consequence or medical reaction, it can be assumed it need not force a special accommodation. If someone says it's a matter of conscience, where there would have to be reasonable proof that smell kills, then you could make an argument to abstain when you know such a person is around. But that would need (1) cooption of medicine to invent an illness where significant rights (eating) can be trampled at the mercy of unlikely, unproven theory, and (2) sheeple society that believe self-destructive altruism toward a person who may not exist is better morals than one's obvious duties to oneself and one's family and neighbors who do exist. And it wouldn't affect private property without further transmission theory.
If people really could die of smelling something, we'd be accumulating death certificates where the diagnosis was allergic reaction to ordinarily occurring airborne phenomena. Yes, if you think peanuts or mayonnaise will inflame you, I'll politely not engage in those nearby you, but you don't run my life. A quick check shows this is almost entirely due to actual ingestion with no deaths blamed on simple scent. Peanuts have dust, but grilling doesn't produce airborne dust AFAIK. So I don't think what you smell will kill you, and again natural evils have their natural limit.
I appreciate this analysis.