FUCK OFF with this fucking bullshit. There are no goddamned violations. Put it in the goddamned sidebar if you’re going to “enforce” it or I’m going to the site owners about your abuse. I’m not putting up with this shit.
a) Calling implies "asking for"...attacking implies "giving an answer".
Example: If I attack you while telling you that you asked for it, then will you accept that?
b) There's only one quality (God given)...the conflict in-between qualify vs disqualify isn't God given, but shaped by taking a side in ignorance of God.
Removed for rule 1. Please rebuttal without violations dude
FUCK OFF with this fucking bullshit. There are no goddamned violations. Put it in the goddamned sidebar if you’re going to “enforce” it or I’m going to the site owners about your abuse. I’m not putting up with this shit.
Calling someone a Jew would qualify as an attack on the person and not the argument.
Did he call someone in c/Conspiracies a Jew or someone else?
@TallestSkil
SAYING THINGS THAT ONLY JEWS HAVE EVER SAID QUALIFIES IT AS CALLING OUT THE PERSON FOR BEING A FUCKING JEW.
Huh, imagine how abhorrent a group of people would have to be in order for their name to become an insult.
a) Calling implies "asking for"...attacking implies "giving an answer".
Example: If I attack you while telling you that you asked for it, then will you accept that?
b) There's only one quality (God given)...the conflict in-between qualify vs disqualify isn't God given, but shaped by taking a side in ignorance of God.