What would happen to a modern(ish) country is every power plant, bridge, and water treatment plant were destroyed inside a one week period?
The US could certainly do this. But it might not be advisable.
What would happen to a modern(ish) country is every power plant, bridge, and water treatment plant were destroyed inside a one week period?
The US could certainly do this. But it might not be advisable.
It would cause a humanitarian crisis. Personally, I like Persians. I'm not so fond of the ones currently in power, but I'm not opposed to Persians running their own country provided they don't feed chaos. I think a lot of people would die unnecessarily
What's the necessity of dying?
a) Few suggest humanitarianism to distract many from being effect within cause by affection for one another.
b) Crisis implies a "turning point"...being implies delineation of life from inception towards point of death. Few suggest crisis-actors to shape turning points within the minds of many, like Turning Point USA for example.
If you see a child rapist, they need to die, since they're most likely to commit the same crime again, it becomes necessary to remove them from the planet.
That's your measuring mind establishing a conflict of reason aka want (child) vs not want (rapist), while ignoring that within nature ...you; me; the child and the rapist need to die. Why?
What if coming into being (be-come) and responding to be moved (re-move) necessitates motion?
What if coming into being (life) implies being removed (inception towards death)?
There's two definitions of "necessary." One delineates a requirement the other an inevitability. You're sort of waffling between the two, or somehow, don't see a distinction between the two.
I forced your hand and picked one. The one implying requirement; because, the person you were responding to was using that form.
What if you stopped talking like Deepak Chopra?