Templar crosses. An expression of papal loyalty.
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (164)
sorted by:
Why would you write a narrative as if you believe the universe is (now) 5,786 years old when you don't believe that? What other impression should one take from your narrative?
How old is the universe in your opinion? Can you point to some clear statement where you took a position on it without equivocation anywhere else?
Do you object to my very consistently saying the universe is (now) 6,018 years old but I recognize that many young-earth proponents use a larger number, up to the range of perhaps a million, and in any case they are united against a number in the billions range? Did I say something to vitiate my own beliefs when I'm engaging the debate against the science mainstream but not the intramural debate among the young earthers?
What is your evidence that I'm doing anything here but volunteering my personal time for SwampRangers.com? Are you making guesses about how I provide for my family?
Are you merely judging that my position proves I must be inorganic? Did you want to debate a binary proposition so we could resolve the status of my position?
Do you object to my characterizing our interactions briefly with evidence? Do you object when I step in after you repel a newcomer "with a weak reed"?
Why don't you get along with me when I follow Christ alone? Where is your evidence of getting along with fellow believers, as I don't recall you ever speaking of attending church or being in communion with others?
What have I said untruly? Are you committed to truth?
A white person can figure this out without asking.
Truth isn’t a matter of opinion.
Yep. I can.
Yep.
“Any number is fine as long as it’s not the number it actually is!” Yes, I already accurately characterized your position in an earlier reply.
The website clearly costs something to host. There’s always a price.
Not really.
I mean, you say things that only inorganics say.
I object to the objectively false characterizations.
Because you don’t.
Why would I be so stupid as to post my personal life on the Internet?
There’s a character limit.
A white person wouldn't promote a fanfic where Jews eliminate all white nations and then get their chronology supernaturally validated, while those few whites that remain must resort to such inbreeding as to suggest to a reader (who stated it publicly) that the fanfic's author sounds like he has an incest fetish.
Visualizing your own doom to such degree as you constantly do has not been held to be an effective technique for victory.
That's why I say I didn't follow it. You express disinterest in my following you, which is also neither white nor Christian.
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ASGEKZXHg/templar-crosses--an-expression-o/c/4eaUoyTl6Rv
Removed for rule 1 violation.
Argument:
Cute. I guess no one who has ever exposed the Protocols is white, right?
Project harder.
Translation: “Never ever even think about any way in which you could ever fail; you don’t have to plan for contingencies, goyim!”
Translation: “Definitely don’t do that, yeah. 100% never ever think of any possibility that your initial plan might go awry.”
Sounds like a personal problem.
Cool, I don’t care what you have to say, though. I don’t believe a word of it. Your input isn’t relevant or valid simply because you had it.
Would you please?
Yes, we can thank Scott Lively for his public commitment to defraying costs, in this case ranging into the tens of dollars, as I said 5 years ago when we were founded.
Fascinating how you choose to answer nothing and support nothing. But there's always hope.
“I DON’T LIKE YOUR ANSWER THEREFORE THERE IS NO ANSWER.” Get fucked. Not playing your game. Your years of scripted bullshit is inhuman. You had your chance and blew it long ago.
Calling someone inhuman, just like subhuman is obviously a rule 1 violation.
Help me help you with these things, please‽