Templar crosses. An expression of papal loyalty.
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (42)
sorted by:
This is an attack on the person, not the argument.(Edit per user I took to being attacked, this isn't an attack, thanks for helping me learn)
Lotta violations today, my fren, is there something I can do to help you two talk more productively?
Oh, not to complain about your modship, but I don't think he was attacking me, he's relying upon his fallacious interpretation of my past comments that he failed to process correctly last time. IMHO.
Unevidenced complaints against my character fail because they are unevidenced. Evidenced complaints against my character fail because the full evidence acquits me, by God's grace. Win-win.
Ask him for evidence. [The one time he dared to produce a lot of evidence, three of his sources were all literally Hebrew University. But oh look, that link of his was taken down from SearchVoat and unarchived so he'll have to find a new one if he wants to keep quoting the U. To start, the three sources were: Mail, "Huge drop in sperm count could lead to human EXTINCTION: Study reveals 60% drop in fertility since 1970 - driven by the unhealthy Western lifestyle." Guardian, "The infertility crisis is beyond doubt. Now scientists must find the cause." News Target, "CONFIRMED: Sperm count in Western men is HALF what it should be; what is happening to the average American man?"]
Thanks, I'm in communication with Tallest about my misunderstanding 2 things today. Hoping everyone can see this as a silver lining to be helping me learn. TEAMWORK
Then that's a problem with the rules. Don't be as censorious as the nazis supposedly were.
The rules are good rules, I'm talking with Tallest and I might have been misunderstanding things today. Thanks for your input, I'm learning.
This is LITERALLY what Xi, Keir, Kim, Netenyahoo, Sheinbaum, Khameni , the covid vaccine propagandists, and co. believe about THEIR rules.
That's a huge hyperinflation. There are good rules and there are bad rules, the first rule here actually adheres to God's rules and therefore is the most good, even if some people can't see that yet.
Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.
If you want anarchy, you'll have to make a free for all thread and I'll mark and flair it.
Completely incorrect. By way of analogy, an explanation.
“When a person swearing an oath about something (O: in the future, affirming or denying that it will occur) includes the expression ‘in sha’ Allah’ (if Allah wills) before finishing the oath, then the oath is not broken in any event if he thereby intends to provide for exceptions. But if he merely says it out of habit, not intending to make an exception to his oath, or if he says it after having finished swearing the oath, then the exception is not valid (O: because when an oath has been completed, its efficacy is established and not eradicable by a statement of exception).” ~ Reliance of the Traveler, O19.5
Astute readers will notice the strong similarities between this form of lawyerly hairsplitting and that of the jewish Talmud. How does this behavior work in practice? Surah 1 is a supplication Muslims make to Allah (seventeen times a day) to keep them from the path of “those with whom Allah is angry” and “those who have lost their way.” This includes Christians. A Christian who objects to this denigration will be met with, “Surah 1 never mentions Christians,” and be expected to accept this as a refutation of his concerns. In responding this way, a Muslim is practicing tawriya. Though Surah 1 does not mention Christians by name, Muslims know the words “those” in Surah 1 refers to Christians and all others who are not Muslim. Another example is the Muslim response to a greeting of “Merry Christmas!” He might say, “I wish you the best.” You believe he has returned a Christmas greeting or at least reflects your happiness at the general state of the season. In actuality, he has expressed his wish for you to convert to Islam. He wishes the best for you in his subjective, sophistic view–that you will become a Muslim.
And so irrespective of the user’s use of the word ‘God’, it does not mean the same entity as the one in the preexisting conversation.
Actually enforce the actual rules as actually written. Or just ban lies, that way we don’t have to retread the same kike arguments every single fucking second of every single fucking day when they keep spamming disproven bullshit over and over.