Thanks! u/Graphenium:
The worldview expressed in the Law of One/“Ra Material” and the Hidden Hand interview
https://www.wanttoknow.info/secret_societies/hidden_hand_081018
The way I see things, these two sources explain existence, the state of our world, and the meaning of life far more accurately than any other. One is a “channeled” work, and the other is a long series of Questions and Answers between a conspiracy forum (RiP ATS) and a self-proclaimed world-controller. I see them as complimentary, showing a deeper reality by showing two sides of the same coin. One side being that of Service-to-Others, and the other being Service-to-Self
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ASG9Vy4Tl/round-table-suggestion-thread/c
Thread will stay open for 3-4 weeks thanks to a very helpful suggestion.
It's older than Groening.
My point is that I'd rather partake whole meals than extricate what is negligible from a raft of poison that has killed others. See what you think of my initial statement.
Ironic considering the abrahamic faiths have caused literally billions of deaths, many of innocents and particularly of gnostics. Your initial statement strikes me much the same as every other time I’ve shared these links and you respond to what they think they say (filtered through your lifetime of cognitive biases) instead of what they actually say, after you briefly skim the summaries that i tell you to skip.
Thanks for admitting your own bias.
I'm being honest with you about my first take. Because of the host I'm interested in starting with inspecting the meat for poison and not wasting time in inspecting the table arrangements. If you see me actually thinking they say something they don't, call it out, but you haven't done so in your other comment and you too have a history IMHO of saying that I'm saying something I don't. If we agree Words Mean Things and know the difference between reading and inferring, that should suffice.
In as much as cognizance of history instills bias, okay, I guess. I mean, it’d be foolish to pretend “Holy Wars”, “martyrdom”, and “Sicarii” are modern inventions.
Being implies part within whole...each meal representing a part appetite (want) within whole hunger (need).
All implies necessity for each one within...one another tempts ones negligence to all. To weaponize negligence...few are suggesting "creatio ex nihilo" to tempt many into a consensus about "nothing".
MY implies possession; INITIAL implies all procession initiating each potential...it's ones state of mind which can be manipulated to deny procession for possession.
"Oneself as another" implies All is Other; "one to another" implies One to All.
What of "creatio ex Deo"?
All WAS before one comes into being by separation from one another...only then can another suggest what all IS.
a) All forwards each one within...no matter what one towards to another.
b) Implication aka if/then implies forward motion aka all ion (action) forwarding each mot (reaction) within...that's natural transference. Artificial transference implies from one (to sell) to another (to buy) aka from ones suggestion towards another ones consent.
Out of (ex) what would a deity (deo) create? Deity implies divine nature aka division of (everything)...not creation out of (nothing).
Create/ker (to grow) implies each partial (growth) within whole (loss). God cannot grow...cause that would imply growing into more than God.
Loss (motion) sets growth (matter) free from one another...few distract from loss by tempting many to hold onto growth; thereby burdening each other.
Implication (if/then) aka if unity (singularity of motion); then towards unit (matter divided from one another).
Diversity (momentum) of unity (motion) implies unit (matter)...not diverse units put together.
Real implies ones response (re) to all (al) aka RE (ones perception) AL (all perceivable)...any suggestion of another implies fiction if consented to.
RE (unit) AL (unity)...the separation in-between implies diversity.
AL implies all natural; RE implies each natives response...the separation of nature into native implies spirit aka nature breathing life into native aka motion using momentum to animate matter.
Only animated matter (life) in-between momentum (inception towards death) can perceive polarity (animation) within singularity (motion).
Singularity (motion) uses polarity (momentum) to charge resistance (matter)...
Only within oneness (whole; cause; motion) can one (partial; effect; matter) come into being...another suggest IS to tempt one into an IS vs ISN'T conflict with one another aka within a mental (logic) and physical (reason) confine.
All WAS before each one within comes into being...only then can one suggest what all IS to one another. Consenting to any suggestion prevents one (perception) from discerning self within all (perceivable).