Why are Democrats opposing voter ID?
(www.americanthinker.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
Driver's licences are only supposed to be issued with a birth certificate from one of the recognized states, territories and other U.S. sovereign soil like military bases.
States like commiefornia and jew york have made it so illegals can get these things. Oh, by the way, would you like to register to vote at the same time?
This is where much of the fraud sneaks in.
To your temporary driving permit, yes, those exist, but they're supposed to be wildly different from the normal citizen's cards. The problem issue is those states previously mentioned do not make that distinction.
Finally seems I got it.
Driver's license is issued by states, and they aaccounted as valid ID for voting. There is no way to force common fed rules on the internal business of state in issuig driver license.
So if some state will not demand birth certificate for driver's license, then there is no way to cut non-citizens from voting - they will show that state driver's license and should be allowed to vote as citizen.
Birth certificate have no photo, so it can't be used as proof of citizenship at voting stations.
Then I don't see any solution other than demand birth certificate along with driver's license at voting stations or implement a new federal (or issued by state under strict fed rules) document. The latter then will give feds unnecessary additional power over all US, at least in question of voting.
Democrats resist voting ID because they need illegal votes of non-citizens, and at the same time conservatives could view voter ID as a feds overreach.
Why not demand birth certificate or whatever document foreigners get, when granted legal citizenship, as a proof of citizenship, in addition to any document with photo at voting stations? No additional suspicious fed IDs, no way for non-citizens to vote (at least massively).