a) Notice the BI in bind implies "two-folded"...those are the sides which conflict with each "ones" free will of choice.
b) If inception (side) > life (sight) > death (side), then one can only see in-between sides. Notice then that one cannot see ones sides...both inception and death remain out of ones living sight.
What of treating God as present?
a) God presents being as presence, hence pre (before) > sent (sending) > sence (sense)...
b) Treatment implies negotiations among being, hence negating one another by trading as traitors to God given "free" will of choice.
There cannot be any mutual agreement between "free" will of choice without binding both sides in conflict with one another.
What of binding without sides or conflict?
a) Notice the BI in bind implies "two-folded"...those are the sides which conflict with each "ones" free will of choice.
b) If inception (side) > life (sight) > death (side), then one can only see in-between sides. Notice then that one cannot see ones sides...both inception and death remain out of ones living sight.
"Bind" from "bhendh-" unity in bend, band, bond, bund.