So is it definitely gonna be project blue beam? Predictions here!
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (77)
sorted by:
I don’t think you get to invoke BBT inflation when that’s something which explicitly occurs during the first few microseconds of existence, LONG before any stars form. And if the stretching out occurred after the stars formed, that would be observed as redshift (it isn’t, at least, not the type you describe, of a one-time stretching event)
And you don’t need to tell me about this stuff. I was posting about “fundamental constants” not necessarily being all that constant years ago. You would give those posts shit because you don’t like Rupert Sheldrake lmao. But you writing some sentence of bullshit on the internet doesn’t account for tens of thousands of professionals and experts who operate in these domains every day who would say your views are next to unfounded.
Anyway, my point is not to get into a debate about any given one of these subjects. My point is you need to deal with “the consensus” with a little more respect than the flippancy of the we wuzzers. Take some lessons from sheldrake:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sF03FN37i5w
You may be right because the Bible invokes a big difference between light and stars. In the plasma universe origin hypothesis, the light begins everywhere at once and coalesces into plasma strands that eventually accrete into stars; even if there were not lightspeed decay, it seems this would account for the microwave background. But then by the same token, ultraviolet radiation would have redshifted into visible light as well. When you're getting to the range of 10 billion lightyears, you've had a chain of several assumptions to come to that conclusion and I'm not an expert on the whole series; but I do know that the experts are arguing about them, and no single news article is interested in giving the whole chain of inferences but only in quoting the scientists who assume them. For the flat-earthers, there is no evidence of 10 billion lightyears, and this opinion can be joined on many other assumptions too, as is demonstrated in the range of opinions in the "consensus" literature.
Oh, I respect it enough to read it open-mindedly, but not enough to agree that it has right of appeal to authority. I'm pretty big on there being a conspiracy to cover up stochastic electrodynamics, so I hope that level of respect is understandable. But I am free to speak boldly due to the knowledge that truth will never deceive me and I have nothing to fear from myriads of contrary "experts": either my claims get backed up by the evidence, or I learn something new and admit it. So sometimes I am "very bold".