Here’s a summary of the book that this video is based on. I recommend the book to anyone whose interest is piqued by the video. Also highly worth checking out part two of the video (linked in another comment)
📘 The Holographic Universe by Michael Talbot — What It’s About
The Holographic Universe explores a radical idea: that reality isn’t the solid, separate world we think it is, but more like a hologram — a unified, interconnected projection of information. Talbot weaves together science, psychology, mysticism, and paranormal phenomena to support this view.
1️⃣ The Holographic Model of Reality
Talbot opens by introducing two key scientific influences:
David Bohm’s quantum physics ideas, which suggest the universe has a deeper “implicate order” where everything is interconnected;
Karl Pribram’s neurophysiology, proposing that the brain stores information holistically, like a hologram.
From this he argues that both the cosmos and the human mind may operate holographically — meaning every part contains information about the whole.
2️⃣ Mind, Consciousness & Perception
A big theme is that consciousness isn’t just a by-product of the brain, but central to reality itself. Talbot suggests:
Our perception actively shapes what we experience;
The mind extends beyond the physical brain (explaining things like dreams, intuition, telepathy, and psychic phenomena);
Consciousness is a nonlocal field — not confined by space or time.
3️⃣ Parapsychology & Extraordinary Experiences
Talbot brings in lots of case studies and real examples:
Telepathy, precognition, and psychokinesis;
Near-death experiences (NDEs) and out-of-body experiences (OBEs);
Miracles, “aura” vision, and other seemingly paranormal events.
Within the holographic framework, these aren’t just oddities — they make sense as phenomena where information isn’t limited by ordinary physical boundaries.
4️⃣ Implications for Science & Spirituality
The book doesn’t just talk physics — it bridges science with spiritual and mystical traditions. Talbot points out parallels between the holographic view and ancient wisdom about unity and interconnectedness. He invites readers to question assumptions about matter, time, space, and what it means to be “real”.
🔍 In short:
Talbot’s The Holographic Universe argues that reality might be a hologram, that mind and matter are deeply interconnected, and that many mysterious human experiences could be windows into a deeper truth about the nature of existence.
We aren’t observing the hologram, we are a part of it
Holo (whole) gram (to draw or write)...only within all can each one draw from reality or write fiction. Holding onto fiction establishes the optical interference pattern within oneself.
One drawing (gram) from all (holo) implies being part of it...one writing/reading from one another implies observance.
neuroscience
One can only perceive (science/scio/to know) NOW...others suggest NEW (neuro) to manipulate ones perception.
our perception of the “hologram” known as “reality”
Holding onto "our" represents the fictitious hologram. Real implies each ones response (re) to all (al) aka a singular delineation of cause > effect.
intersection of... consciousness
Inter (within) sec (to separate) tion (action) implies an analytical process. Con (together) scious (to perceive) ness (denoting action) implies a shaped synthesis.
Intersection implies reality; consciousness represents fiction. Other words for consciousness...hivemind; gestalt intelligence; egregore; collective consciousness; mind coalescence; swarm intelligence; universal mind; group think etc.
Two-dimensional data (GATTACA) given Three-dimensional form via the interplay of Light and Shadow - all that’s needed is Soul, or the breathe of life, from the Whole (holo) to the One (gram)
A) Two particles created in the same event are “entangled”, facilitating Spukhafte Fernwirkung or “spooky action at a distance”
B) All particles in the universe ultimately derive from a single event (a so-called “big bang”)
Thus:
Other words for consciousness...hivemind; gestalt intelligence; egregore; collective consciousness; mind coalescence; swarm intelligence; universal mind; group think…
Two-dimensional given Three-dimensional form...all that’s needed is Soul
Soul/sole - "one and only" aka one flow giving form to each one within by division.
Dimensional aka di (to divide) mens (mind) ion (action) al (all) aka all action dividing each ones mind from one another. It's not TWO dimensional, but oneness dividing internally into opposites. It's not THREE dimensional, but each one (life) coming into being in-between opposites (inception/death) of oneness.
Only matter (three) within momentum (two) of motion (one) has the free will of choice to count together what nature sets apart from one another. Others trick one to count, which makes one accountable to others, while distracting from discerning self as within singularity by joining plurality with one another.
Data implies all perceivable given to each ones perception. Any exchangeable data aka suggestible information tempts one to TAKE while ignore given.
Gattaca
The last time I watched that was on VHS. Anyway...the DNA origin of the name is based on shaping a double-helix aka one matter + one matter turned against one another aka the serpent's coil aka ourobouros aka the ring that binds aka kike/kikel/circle aka internal (logic) and external (reason) confinement.
Soul, or the breathe of life
Soul (motion) > breathe (momentum) > life (matter)...not OR, since only matter alternates aka adaptation (matter) to change (motion) as choice within balance (momentum).
Two particles created in the same event are “entangled”, facilitating Spukhafte Fernwirkung or “spooky action at a distance”
Two implies counted together by one being. Another one suggests creationism to establish entanglement within ones mind. Ones consent to another ones suggested -ism establishes the "two" aka one and one together.
As for Spukhafte Fernwirkung aka the anthropomorphic animation of a being by another from outside...that's the jewish Golem... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golem
Here's the related quote: "Over the centuries, it (Golem) has been used to connote war, community, isolation, hope, and despair." Spooky; ain't it?
As for Spuk aka Mr. Spock; spies called spooks; blacks called spooks etc. That's about "specter, apparition, ghost" aka utilizing the process of dying by distracting those living within from being animated aka being a living dead.
Life inhales the animating spirit, while exhaling the ghost of death...to distract from that...perceivable sound gets inverted into suggestible words, so that a being doesn't draw from animation, but instead animates corpus-oration aka the language of death.
Words do not animate...they draw animation out of life.
All particles in the universe ultimately derive from a single event (a so-called “big bang”)
a) Particle implies each one within all..."all particles" implies a sum of particles put together.
b) Only particles can "bang" against one another, which puts form at odds with one another, while ignoring the single even flow aka the event horizon (inception towards death) for each zenith (life) rising within.
c) Derive aka de (to divide) rive/rei (to flow) aka flow deriving into form.
I think we can recognize God therein
I implies taking possession over oneself; WE implies singular one joining plurality with one another...both contradict re (to respond) cognize (to perceive).
God (all perceivable) therein (each ones perception) implies an analytical process...not a synthesis of putting possession (i) together (we).
Once one chooses to resist synthesis (suggestion)...analysis (perception) allows one to recognize self as therein God, which makes it clearer how others are synthesizing to obscure ones self discernment.
Yeah, super interesting stuff, this intersection of physics and consciousness and everything that gets labeled “supernatural” (only by those unaware of the totality of “nature”, of course).
These videos are based on a book (plus some of the scientific developments after the book was published). I posted a summary of the book in another comment, you might find that interesting too.
guess I made the mistake in SR's christian group posting about such personal experiences there. And did not share in this group because my personal experiences are Not "conspiracy", but literally Real...
Here’s a summary of the book that this video is based on. I recommend the book to anyone whose interest is piqued by the video. Also highly worth checking out part two of the video (linked in another comment)
📘 The Holographic Universe by Michael Talbot — What It’s About
The Holographic Universe explores a radical idea: that reality isn’t the solid, separate world we think it is, but more like a hologram — a unified, interconnected projection of information. Talbot weaves together science, psychology, mysticism, and paranormal phenomena to support this view.
1️⃣ The Holographic Model of Reality Talbot opens by introducing two key scientific influences:
2️⃣ Mind, Consciousness & Perception A big theme is that consciousness isn’t just a by-product of the brain, but central to reality itself. Talbot suggests:
3️⃣ Parapsychology & Extraordinary Experiences Talbot brings in lots of case studies and real examples:
4️⃣ Implications for Science & Spirituality The book doesn’t just talk physics — it bridges science with spiritual and mystical traditions. Talbot points out parallels between the holographic view and ancient wisdom about unity and interconnectedness. He invites readers to question assumptions about matter, time, space, and what it means to be “real”.
🔍 In short: Talbot’s The Holographic Universe argues that reality might be a hologram, that mind and matter are deeply interconnected, and that many mysterious human experiences could be windows into a deeper truth about the nature of existence.
176 pg PDF: https://www.rybn.org/ANTI/ADMXI/documentation/ADMXI/IV.ALGORITHMS/QUANTUM_V/PARALLELISM/HOLOGRAPHIC_UNIVERSE/1991_Michael_Talbot_-_The_Holographic_Universe.pdf
Holo (whole) gram (to draw or write)...only within all can each one draw from reality or write fiction. Holding onto fiction establishes the optical interference pattern within oneself.
One drawing (gram) from all (holo) implies being part of it...one writing/reading from one another implies observance.
One can only perceive (science/scio/to know) NOW...others suggest NEW (neuro) to manipulate ones perception.
Holding onto "our" represents the fictitious hologram. Real implies each ones response (re) to all (al) aka a singular delineation of cause > effect.
Inter (within) sec (to separate) tion (action) implies an analytical process. Con (together) scious (to perceive) ness (denoting action) implies a shaped synthesis.
Intersection implies reality; consciousness represents fiction. Other words for consciousness...hivemind; gestalt intelligence; egregore; collective consciousness; mind coalescence; swarm intelligence; universal mind; group think etc.
Two-dimensional data (GATTACA) given Three-dimensional form via the interplay of Light and Shadow - all that’s needed is Soul, or the breathe of life, from the Whole (holo) to the One (gram)
A) Two particles created in the same event are “entangled”, facilitating Spukhafte Fernwirkung or “spooky action at a distance”
B) All particles in the universe ultimately derive from a single event (a so-called “big bang”)
Thus:
I think we can recognize God therein
Soul/sole - "one and only" aka one flow giving form to each one within by division.
Dimensional aka di (to divide) mens (mind) ion (action) al (all) aka all action dividing each ones mind from one another. It's not TWO dimensional, but oneness dividing internally into opposites. It's not THREE dimensional, but each one (life) coming into being in-between opposites (inception/death) of oneness.
Only matter (three) within momentum (two) of motion (one) has the free will of choice to count together what nature sets apart from one another. Others trick one to count, which makes one accountable to others, while distracting from discerning self as within singularity by joining plurality with one another.
Data/dare/do - "to give"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/data
Data implies all perceivable given to each ones perception. Any exchangeable data aka suggestible information tempts one to TAKE while ignore given.
The last time I watched that was on VHS. Anyway...the DNA origin of the name is based on shaping a double-helix aka one matter + one matter turned against one another aka the serpent's coil aka ourobouros aka the ring that binds aka kike/kikel/circle aka internal (logic) and external (reason) confinement.
Soul (motion) > breathe (momentum) > life (matter)...not OR, since only matter alternates aka adaptation (matter) to change (motion) as choice within balance (momentum).
Two implies counted together by one being. Another one suggests creationism to establish entanglement within ones mind. Ones consent to another ones suggested -ism establishes the "two" aka one and one together.
As for Spukhafte Fernwirkung aka the anthropomorphic animation of a being by another from outside...that's the jewish Golem... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golem
Here's the related quote: "Over the centuries, it (Golem) has been used to connote war, community, isolation, hope, and despair." Spooky; ain't it?
As for Spuk aka Mr. Spock; spies called spooks; blacks called spooks etc. That's about "specter, apparition, ghost" aka utilizing the process of dying by distracting those living within from being animated aka being a living dead.
Life inhales the animating spirit, while exhaling the ghost of death...to distract from that...perceivable sound gets inverted into suggestible words, so that a being doesn't draw from animation, but instead animates corpus-oration aka the language of death.
Words do not animate...they draw animation out of life.
a) Particle implies each one within all..."all particles" implies a sum of particles put together.
b) Only particles can "bang" against one another, which puts form at odds with one another, while ignoring the single even flow aka the event horizon (inception towards death) for each zenith (life) rising within.
c) Derive aka de (to divide) rive/rei (to flow) aka flow deriving into form.
I implies taking possession over oneself; WE implies singular one joining plurality with one another...both contradict re (to respond) cognize (to perceive).
God (all perceivable) therein (each ones perception) implies an analytical process...not a synthesis of putting possession (i) together (we).
Once one chooses to resist synthesis (suggestion)...analysis (perception) allows one to recognize self as therein God, which makes it clearer how others are synthesizing to obscure ones self discernment.
Sounds cool, I hope to watch this soon! (And add to discussion)
I recommend part 2 as well, which gets into the neuroscience side of things (i.e. our perception of the “hologram” known as “reality”):
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VB1Kwjbz4nU
Ok cool, I have about 20 mins to go on this first one, hope to get the next one in too but time is a factor for me the next buncha hours.
I love this stuff tho, great picks!
Yeah, super interesting stuff, this intersection of physics and consciousness and everything that gets labeled “supernatural” (only by those unaware of the totality of “nature”, of course).
These videos are based on a book (plus some of the scientific developments after the book was published). I posted a summary of the book in another comment, you might find that interesting too.
Just got to start the 2nd episode and I felt like adding Brian Greene's Nova presentations, they are a few of my favorite things:
The Elegant Universe Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
The Fabric Of The Cosmos
Edit: fabric of the cosmos has 4 parts available at that link.
guess I made the mistake in SR's christian group posting about such personal experiences there. And did not share in this group because my personal experiences are Not "conspiracy", but literally Real...
Also, oooooo, frequency domain stuff, all comes down being tuned into the Most High God's frequency 😎
Edit: and now they've got AI reading minds with scans and frequency fields, yikes.
u/#catdance
Vibrating at the Most High Frequency