Two-dimensional data (GATTACA) given Three-dimensional form via the interplay of Light and Shadow - all that’s needed is Soul, or the breathe of life, from the Whole (holo) to the One (gram)
A) Two particles created in the same event are “entangled”, facilitating Spukhafte Fernwirkung or “spooky action at a distance”
B) All particles in the universe ultimately derive from a single event (a so-called “big bang”)
Thus:
Other words for consciousness...hivemind; gestalt intelligence; egregore; collective consciousness; mind coalescence; swarm intelligence; universal mind; group think…
Two-dimensional given Three-dimensional form...all that’s needed is Soul
Soul/sole - "one and only" aka one flow giving form to each one within by division.
Dimensional aka di (to divide) mens (mind) ion (action) al (all) aka all action dividing each ones mind from one another. It's not TWO dimensional, but oneness dividing internally into opposites. It's not THREE dimensional, but each one (life) coming into being in-between opposites (inception/death) of oneness.
Only matter (three) within momentum (two) of motion (one) has the free will of choice to count together what nature sets apart from one another. Others trick one to count, which makes one accountable to others, while distracting from discerning self as within singularity by joining plurality with one another.
Data implies all perceivable given to each ones perception. Any exchangeable data aka suggestible information tempts one to TAKE while ignore given.
Gattaca
The last time I watched that was on VHS. Anyway...the DNA origin of the name is based on shaping a double-helix aka one matter + one matter turned against one another aka the serpent's coil aka ourobouros aka the ring that binds aka kike/kikel/circle aka internal (logic) and external (reason) confinement.
Soul, or the breathe of life
Soul (motion) > breathe (momentum) > life (matter)...not OR, since only matter alternates aka adaptation (matter) to change (motion) as choice within balance (momentum).
Two particles created in the same event are “entangled”, facilitating Spukhafte Fernwirkung or “spooky action at a distance”
Two implies counted together by one being. Another one suggests creationism to establish entanglement within ones mind. Ones consent to another ones suggested -ism establishes the "two" aka one and one together.
As for Spukhafte Fernwirkung aka the anthropomorphic animation of a being by another from outside...that's the jewish Golem... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golem
Here's the related quote: "Over the centuries, it (Golem) has been used to connote war, community, isolation, hope, and despair." Spooky; ain't it?
As for Spuk aka Mr. Spock; spies called spooks; blacks called spooks etc. That's about "specter, apparition, ghost" aka utilizing the process of dying by distracting those living within from being animated aka being a living dead.
Life inhales the animating spirit, while exhaling the ghost of death...to distract from that...perceivable sound gets inverted into suggestible words, so that a being doesn't draw from animation, but instead animates corpus-oration aka the language of death.
Words do not animate...they draw animation out of life.
All particles in the universe ultimately derive from a single event (a so-called “big bang”)
a) Particle implies each one within all..."all particles" implies a sum of particles put together.
b) Only particles can "bang" against one another, which puts form at odds with one another, while ignoring the single even flow aka the event horizon (inception towards death) for each zenith (life) rising within.
c) Derive aka de (to divide) rive/rei (to flow) aka flow deriving into form.
I think we can recognize God therein
I implies taking possession over oneself; WE implies singular one joining plurality with one another...both contradict re (to respond) cognize (to perceive).
God (all perceivable) therein (each ones perception) implies an analytical process...not a synthesis of putting possession (i) together (we).
Once one chooses to resist synthesis (suggestion)...analysis (perception) allows one to recognize self as therein God, which makes it clearer how others are synthesizing to obscure ones self discernment.
Two-dimensional data (GATTACA) given Three-dimensional form via the interplay of Light and Shadow - all that’s needed is Soul, or the breathe of life, from the Whole (holo) to the One (gram)
A) Two particles created in the same event are “entangled”, facilitating Spukhafte Fernwirkung or “spooky action at a distance”
B) All particles in the universe ultimately derive from a single event (a so-called “big bang”)
Thus:
I think we can recognize God therein
Soul/sole - "one and only" aka one flow giving form to each one within by division.
Dimensional aka di (to divide) mens (mind) ion (action) al (all) aka all action dividing each ones mind from one another. It's not TWO dimensional, but oneness dividing internally into opposites. It's not THREE dimensional, but each one (life) coming into being in-between opposites (inception/death) of oneness.
Only matter (three) within momentum (two) of motion (one) has the free will of choice to count together what nature sets apart from one another. Others trick one to count, which makes one accountable to others, while distracting from discerning self as within singularity by joining plurality with one another.
Data/dare/do - "to give"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/data
Data implies all perceivable given to each ones perception. Any exchangeable data aka suggestible information tempts one to TAKE while ignore given.
The last time I watched that was on VHS. Anyway...the DNA origin of the name is based on shaping a double-helix aka one matter + one matter turned against one another aka the serpent's coil aka ourobouros aka the ring that binds aka kike/kikel/circle aka internal (logic) and external (reason) confinement.
Soul (motion) > breathe (momentum) > life (matter)...not OR, since only matter alternates aka adaptation (matter) to change (motion) as choice within balance (momentum).
Two implies counted together by one being. Another one suggests creationism to establish entanglement within ones mind. Ones consent to another ones suggested -ism establishes the "two" aka one and one together.
As for Spukhafte Fernwirkung aka the anthropomorphic animation of a being by another from outside...that's the jewish Golem... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golem
Here's the related quote: "Over the centuries, it (Golem) has been used to connote war, community, isolation, hope, and despair." Spooky; ain't it?
As for Spuk aka Mr. Spock; spies called spooks; blacks called spooks etc. That's about "specter, apparition, ghost" aka utilizing the process of dying by distracting those living within from being animated aka being a living dead.
Life inhales the animating spirit, while exhaling the ghost of death...to distract from that...perceivable sound gets inverted into suggestible words, so that a being doesn't draw from animation, but instead animates corpus-oration aka the language of death.
Words do not animate...they draw animation out of life.
a) Particle implies each one within all..."all particles" implies a sum of particles put together.
b) Only particles can "bang" against one another, which puts form at odds with one another, while ignoring the single even flow aka the event horizon (inception towards death) for each zenith (life) rising within.
c) Derive aka de (to divide) rive/rei (to flow) aka flow deriving into form.
I implies taking possession over oneself; WE implies singular one joining plurality with one another...both contradict re (to respond) cognize (to perceive).
God (all perceivable) therein (each ones perception) implies an analytical process...not a synthesis of putting possession (i) together (we).
Once one chooses to resist synthesis (suggestion)...analysis (perception) allows one to recognize self as therein God, which makes it clearer how others are synthesizing to obscure ones self discernment.