Tikkun Olam = Repairing the world through TRANSHUMANISM, every jew will have 2800 mindless goyim (human cattle) slaves in the end times according to your satanic babylonian book.
Kabbalism is Gnosticism and the demiurge is a fake creator god that's identified as Saturn, Satan, Samael.
Sophia and Lucifer are both associated with the planet Venus, and they are both fake light bringers btw.
Gnosticism comes straight out of the wicked Babylonian Mystery Schools that worship fallen entities as gods.
The 666 hex star of Remphan, Chiun, Saturn represents the male (upward triangle = satan) and female (downward triangle = lucifer) aspects of the devil.
In Cabala, the Sacred Tree of the Sephiroth is claimed to represent the Cosmos, including God (male), his Shekinah (Anna, the Goddess/female), and the Kingdom of Zion. As shown here, the Foundation of all things is the male genitals, or the sex generative process. (Zolar’s Encyclopedia of Ancient and Forbidden Knowledge, Arco Publishing, 1984) Qabalah [also known as Kabbalah. "According to Albert Pike, Gnosticism was an offshoot of Kabalism, an oral occult tradition, which was adhered to by a minority of the Jews. At some point, which remains uncertain, these occult teachings were reduced to writing, and the Kabalah was born. On page 626 of 'Morals and Dogma', Pike states, 'The Kabalah is the key of the occult sciences; and the Gnostics were born of the Kabalists'. Kabalism was merely a unique version of the ancient mysteries specifically designed to deceive God's chosen people. Unlike the other mysteries, its teachings dealt specifically with Israel, offering occult counter-explanations to the revelations of the prophets, complete with a cleverly disguised occult interpretation of the history of Israel." ["Enroute To Global Occupation", by Gary Kah p. 99]
Talisman of Saturn 1. The Talisman of Saturn became known as the Seal of Solomon. In the Book The History and Practice of Magic, Vol. 2, the six-pointed star is called the talisman of Saturn and it is also referred to as the Seal of Solomon From James Fausset Brown commentary on Amos 5:26 the star of your god — R. Isaac Caro says all the astrologers represented Saturn as the star of Israel. Probably there was a figure of a star on the head of the image of the idol, to represent the planet Saturn; hence “images” correspond to “star” in the parallel clause. A star in hieroglyphics represents God (Num_24:17). “Images” are either a Hebraism for “image,” or refer to the many images made to represent Chiun. John Gill commentary on Amos 5:26 The star of your god, which ye made to yourselves; or the star “your god” (q); meaning the same with Chiun or Saturn; perhaps the same with the star that fell from the air or sky, mentioned by Sanchoniatho (r); which Astarte, the wife of Chronus or Saturn, is said to take and consecrate in Tyre; this they made for themselves, and worshipped as a deity. The Targum is, “ye have borne the tabernacle of your priests, Chiun your image, the star your God, which ye have made to yourselves.” It may be further observed, for the confirmation and illustration of what has been said concerning Chiun, that the Egyptian Anubis, which Plutarch (x) says is the same with Saturn, is called by him Kyon, which seems to be no other than this word Chiun: and whereas Stephen calls it Rephan, this is not a corruption of the word, reading Rephan or Revan for Chevan; nor has he respect to Rimmon, the god of the Syrians, but it is the Egyptian name for Saturn; which the Septuagint interpreters might choose to make use of, they interpreting for the king of Egypt: and Diodorus Siculus (y) makes mention of an Egyptian king called Remphis, whom Braunius (z) takes to be this very Chiun; see Act_7:43; but Rephas, or Rephan, was the same with Chronus, or Saturn, from whence came the Rephaim (a), who dwelt in Ashtaroth Karnaim, a town of Ham or Chronus; see Gen_14:5. (q) “ כוכב אלהיכםsidus deum vestrum”, Liveleus; “sidus, vel stellam deos vestros”, Calvin. (r) Apud Euseb. Praepar. Evangel. l. 1. p. 38. (s) “ כיון צלמיכםplacentam imagiuum vestrarum”, Pagninus, Tigurine version, Vatablus. (t) Dictionary, in the word “Chiun”. (u) “Basim imaginum vestrarum”, Junius & Tremellius, Piscator; “statumen”, Burkius. (w) Apud Euseb. Praepar. Evangel. l. 1. p. 35. (x) De Iside. (y) Bibliothec. l. 1. p. 56. “…Solomon’s blatant idolatry had angered the Lord to the point of bringing about the division of the kingdom 469 of Israel. Part of the evidence is the six-pointed star, which was called the Seal of Solomon from then on. Let us investigate those false gods with which he was involved. “First mentioned was ASHTORETH, otherwise called ASTARTE, the word meaning STAR. “II Kings 23:13 is explicit: ‘And the high places that were before Jerusalem, which were on the right hand of the mount of corruption, which Solomon the king of Israel had builded for Ashtoreth the abomination of the Zidonians, and for Chemosh the abomination of the Moabites, and for Milcom the abomination of the children of Ammon, did the king defile.’… “King Solomon built an altar for Ashtoreth, worshipped her, and also practiced Moloch rituals. It was at this time that the HEXAGRAM OR SIX-POINTED STAR CAME TO BE CALLED THE SEAL OF SOLOMON… “…the Seal of Solomon or six-pointed star, or hexagram…was considered an ALL-POWERFUL TALISMAN especially when accompanied by the Hebrew Yod…It was also combined with the Tau cross, or Crux Ansanta in the center… International Standard Bible Encyclopedia Ashtoreth The moon goddess of the Phoenicians, representing the passive principle in nature, their principal female deity; frequently associated with the name of Baal, the sun-god, their chief male deity (Jdg_10:6; 1Sa_7:4; 1Sa_12:10). These names often occur in the plural (Ashtaroth, Baalim), probably as indicating either different statues or different modifications of the deities. This deity is spoken of as Ashtoreth of the Zidonians. She was the Ishtar of the Accadians and the Astarte of the Greeks (Jer_44:17; 1Ki_11:5, 1Ki_11:33; 2Ki_23:13). There was a temple of this goddess among the Philistines in the time of Saul (1Sa_31:10). Under the name of Ishtar, she was one of the great deities of the Assyrians. The Phoenicians called her Astarte. Solomon introduced the worship of this idol (1Ki_11:33). Jezebel’s 400 priests were probably employed in its service (1Ki_18:19). It was called the “queen of heaven” (Jer_44:25). John Gill the star of your god {hexagram/Talisman of Saturn/seal of Solomon/star of David}, which ye made to yourselves; or the star “your god” (q); meaning the same with Chiun or Saturn; perhaps the same with the star that fell from the air or sky*, mentioned by Sanchoniatho (r); which Astarte, the wife of Chronus or Saturn, is said to take and consecrate in Tyre; this they made for themselves, and worshipped as a deity. ISBE (International Standard Bible Encyclopedia) In Assyrian asirtu, which appears also under the forms asratu, esreti (plural) and asru, had the further signification of “sanctuary.” Originally Asirtu, the wife of Asir, and asirtu, “sanctuary,” seem to have had no connection with one another, but the identity in the pronunciation of the two words caused them to be identified in signification, and as the tree-trunk or cone of stone which symbolized Asherah was regarded as a Bethel or “house of the deity*,” wherein the goddess was immanent, the word Asirtu, Asherah, came to denote the symbol of the goddess.
Tikkun Olam = Repairing the world through TRANSHUMANISM
Where do you get your information from? The term “transhumanism” was coined by the English biologist Julian Huxley in 1957. The term Kabbalah refers specifically to the form of Jewish mysticism that became widespread in the Middle Ages. But, Kabbalah is an ancient tradition that is over 4,000 years old. And according to many scholars is the oldest religion.
according to your satanic babylonian book
I have no idea what this means, or where you're going with this.
Kabbalism is Gnosticism and the demiurge is a fake creator god that's identified as Saturn, Satan, Samael
Again where do you come up with this nonsense. Like all of the planets, Saturn is named after a character in Roman mythology... It wasn't until 1655, when Christiaan Huygens pointed his much more powerful telescope at Saturn and the planet was identified. The earliest I can trace the word Satan in English is to the 10th century. Gnosticism originated in the Hellenistic period, that means Gnosticism is approximately 2,000 years old. I quoted you directly from the Secret Book of John where it clearly says the Demiurge has three names: "The first name is Yaldabaoth, the second is Saklas, and the third is Samael." - John, the brother of James – who are the sons of Zebedee
Gnosticism comes straight out of the wicked Babylonian Mystery Schools that worship fallen entities as gods
Again, just more nonsense. And again what is your source for this accusation? for Gnostics Jesus Christ is seen as a spiritual messenger his purpose is to bring hidden knowledge that awakens Humanity to their divine nature guiding them toward liberation. Have you read any of the manuscripts discovered at Nag Hammadi? how about the Gospel of Thomas (Apostle Thomas)? For Gnostics Christ is a revealer of Truth. Gnosticism flourished in the early centuries of the Common Era alongside early Christians and it profoundly influenced Christian theology and philosophy particularly through its focus on inner enlightenment and spiritual transformation. However as Orthodox Christianity began to solidify its doctrines Gnosticism was declared heretical, the church fathers including Irenaeus and Tertullian condemned Gnostic teachings as dangerous deviations from the faith that both the Catholic Church and Rome agreed upon. In other words it didn't serve the imperial interests.
Gnostics don't see Jesus Christ as the almighty Creator in the flesh
Why would they? when Jesus's mission was of spiritual liberation, not creating a new religion. Jesus and Christ are not the same thing. Jesus was the man. Christ is the consciousness he achieved. Jesus became the Christ, but Christ consciousness existed before Jesus and remains available after Jesus. This isn't diminishing Jesus. It's understanding his true accomplishment. And Gnostics knew that.
The Church is telling you, don't listen to what actually Jesus teaches. Believe us, Jesus is God the "Creator in the flesh". And many people fall for it. What does this even mean? first thing, the Church made Jesus part of what they call the Trinity. Why? because the Jews believe Yahweh created this material world we live in. So, Jesus had to become God (Yahweh), although Jesus never said he was God. Trinity means God exists as three persons, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. But these three are somehow also one God. Now this already is very confusing, because if Jesus is the Son of God, then how is he also God? And if he's both Son and Father, then what does that even mean? This is the kind of logical paradox that has caused theological debates for 2,000 years, and we still don't have a clear answer. So, remember before the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD, the first ecumenical council of the Christian Church, societies were paganistic or polytheistic. Then with emperor Constantine God became the Holy Trinity. The Holy Trinity is the weirdest idea in human history. The Holy Trinity is this God is nothing and everything. And what this means is God is both real and not real. God is a symbol and reality itself. And because of this idea, people are now forced to think abstractly about the world. And it gives rise to money, nation state and science. Serves perfectly the imperial interests and now the Church is an important part of the Empire. People are now forced to think abstractly about the world. Whereas people before could think very concretely about the world.
they follow false doctrines of demons according to the Holy Scriptures
After Jesus's death there were many groups and movements who considered themselves Christians, Gnostics being one of them. Not many people know that the first Christian state was not Catholic Rome, but a Gnostic one, Osroene, with its capital at Edessa in modern Turkey near the Syrian border. The Gnostic teacher, Bardesanes (or Bardaisan), converted King Abgar IX, who ruled 177-212. Bardesanes was credited by church fathers with inventing the Christian hymn and wrote 150 songs that were popular for generations. The most famous is the “Hymn of the Pearl,” a beautiful allegory of the soul being lost in the world and returning to God, found in The Acts of Thomas, an early 3rd century text. However, Roman empire made sure to use propaganda against Gnostics as heretics, which led Gnostics to be persecuted, killed and others to ran away. A small number of Gnostics survived such relentless persecutions. Once the Catholic faction received the official support of the Roman Emperor Constantine in 325, persecution of heretics intensified and the Gnostics went underground and faded away.
This is the kind of logical paradox that has caused theological debates for 2,000 years, and we still don't have a clear answer.
If we took a little effort to compare it to the paradoxes of what gnostics actually taught, your head would be spinning so fast you'd beg for the simplicity of diverse unity.
I accept that the church (I) must back out some significant language that we've encrusted onto the Scripture. I've done that. If you want to say Jesus never said he was God and is never called "Creator in the flesh", fine. That doesn't change who he is and who he said he is, which can be stated without any such language. I believe I linked you my article written as a concession to antitrinitarians, but I don't recall you commenting.
Do you believe the maxim of the law that the testimony of two or three is one? Because the Jews all knew this, and knew the concept of corporate unity, and their problem was not with those points. Millions of Jews accepted the Christian revelation in the first century, and millions of Jews rejected it on the grounds of fear that Jesus's apostles would upend their comfy synagogue lifestyles of sin. Jesus was not tried as an idolator but as a rabblerouser ("inciter").
The Holy Trinity is the weirdest idea in human history.
Coming from a gnostic who believes that a Monad emanated fifteen male-female dyads, the last female of which birthed an evil demiurge without marital support but also without sin, that's projection. I told you that idea was Egyptian and literally comes from Kek, but you continue to take it seriously.
All you need to do is admit that the Monad is incomprehensible as a pure monism and recognize that the point of the first emanation, Logos, is to reveal something equal in every way to the Monad except where they are poles on one spectrum. If you accept that much, you believe in unity and diversity as well as, or better than, many trinitarians who don't know what they believe.
The Star of Remphan comes straight from the wicked King Solomon who rejected the almighty creator, and summoned demons with his 666 hex engraved signet ring in effort to build his temple.
King solomon was a wicked demonologist that literally summoned 72 demons!
(1) The link shows that the real, original "star of Remphan" was the 8th-century BC "star of Chiun" (which is a pun BTW) and the most likely referent for that was the bronze Nehushtan serpent/seraph. It's possible that Solomon in his other idolatries edged Nehushtan toward its later idolatrous status, but that's quite a bit different from the legends around the star-being that, much later, associated it with hexagrams. (2) The hexagram, not seen in Israel until about 300 AD, was not associated with 666 until very recently; 666 most likely refers first to Caesar Nero and then to the Roman beast system. (3) The idea that Solomon had supernatural help in building the temple is present in the Bible and in tradition, but this would only be under Yahweh's control because it is unmistakable that the temple was designed to have no infiltration from spirits contrary to Yahweh. Solomon, for instance, calls on Sophia under the name of Hochma, but this is not the much later gnostic Sophia but only the wisdom of Yahweh as personified. (4) Solomon would have had a signet ring (perhaps passed down to Jehoiachin as the prophets suggest), but the association of this ring with the hexagram or a particular seal is much later in Arabic tradition. (5) Solomon would presumably have known about the 72 names taken to be encoded in Exodus at the Red Sea crossing; these were also taken as names of attributes of God, and only later associated with independent or malevolent spirits.
So these strands have become tied together in modern narrative, but the original case would've been quite a bit different. Without judging Solomon's character as good or bad in the whole, what would I conclude? Solomon may have promoted Nehushtan and permitted it to be associated with the name of Chiun and of Rephaim; he may have been associated with patterns of sixes (speculative), and the Holiest was certainly a golden cube; he called on Hochma and on supernatural assistance in building the temple, and may have known the 72 names regarded as spiritual conduits of such assistance; and he had a signet ring that may have taken on divine energy. Obviously he is known to have bowed down in syncretistic houses of worship constructed for idolatrous names, which is regarded as idolatry and a conflict of character taken from our distant perspective. The historical data don't give us the right to make dogmatic insistences or judgments on much more than that.
You affirm the Almighty Creator of the Garden of Eden. How can one find him without reliance upon the record kept by the covenant people of his Being?
Tikkun Olam = Repairing the world through TRANSHUMANISM, every jew will have 2800 mindless goyim (human cattle) slaves in the end times according to your satanic babylonian book.
Kabbalism is Gnosticism and the demiurge is a fake creator god that's identified as Saturn, Satan, Samael.
Sophia and Lucifer are both associated with the planet Venus, and they are both fake light bringers btw.
Gnosticism comes straight out of the wicked Babylonian Mystery Schools that worship fallen entities as gods.
The 666 hex star of Remphan, Chiun, Saturn represents the male (upward triangle = satan) and female (downward triangle = lucifer) aspects of the devil.
Where do you get your information from? The term “transhumanism” was coined by the English biologist Julian Huxley in 1957. The term Kabbalah refers specifically to the form of Jewish mysticism that became widespread in the Middle Ages. But, Kabbalah is an ancient tradition that is over 4,000 years old. And according to many scholars is the oldest religion.
I have no idea what this means, or where you're going with this.
Again where do you come up with this nonsense. Like all of the planets, Saturn is named after a character in Roman mythology... It wasn't until 1655, when Christiaan Huygens pointed his much more powerful telescope at Saturn and the planet was identified. The earliest I can trace the word Satan in English is to the 10th century. Gnosticism originated in the Hellenistic period, that means Gnosticism is approximately 2,000 years old. I quoted you directly from the Secret Book of John where it clearly says the Demiurge has three names: "The first name is Yaldabaoth, the second is Saklas, and the third is Samael." - John, the brother of James – who are the sons of Zebedee
Again, just more nonsense. And again what is your source for this accusation? for Gnostics Jesus Christ is seen as a spiritual messenger his purpose is to bring hidden knowledge that awakens Humanity to their divine nature guiding them toward liberation. Have you read any of the manuscripts discovered at Nag Hammadi? how about the Gospel of Thomas (Apostle Thomas)? For Gnostics Christ is a revealer of Truth. Gnosticism flourished in the early centuries of the Common Era alongside early Christians and it profoundly influenced Christian theology and philosophy particularly through its focus on inner enlightenment and spiritual transformation. However as Orthodox Christianity began to solidify its doctrines Gnosticism was declared heretical, the church fathers including Irenaeus and Tertullian condemned Gnostic teachings as dangerous deviations from the faith that both the Catholic Church and Rome agreed upon. In other words it didn't serve the imperial interests.
Gnostics don't see Jesus Christ as the almighty Creator in the flesh, they follow false doctrines of demons according to the Holy Scriptures.
Why would they? when Jesus's mission was of spiritual liberation, not creating a new religion. Jesus and Christ are not the same thing. Jesus was the man. Christ is the consciousness he achieved. Jesus became the Christ, but Christ consciousness existed before Jesus and remains available after Jesus. This isn't diminishing Jesus. It's understanding his true accomplishment. And Gnostics knew that.
The Church is telling you, don't listen to what actually Jesus teaches. Believe us, Jesus is God the "Creator in the flesh". And many people fall for it. What does this even mean? first thing, the Church made Jesus part of what they call the Trinity. Why? because the Jews believe Yahweh created this material world we live in. So, Jesus had to become God (Yahweh), although Jesus never said he was God. Trinity means God exists as three persons, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. But these three are somehow also one God. Now this already is very confusing, because if Jesus is the Son of God, then how is he also God? And if he's both Son and Father, then what does that even mean? This is the kind of logical paradox that has caused theological debates for 2,000 years, and we still don't have a clear answer. So, remember before the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD, the first ecumenical council of the Christian Church, societies were paganistic or polytheistic. Then with emperor Constantine God became the Holy Trinity. The Holy Trinity is the weirdest idea in human history. The Holy Trinity is this God is nothing and everything. And what this means is God is both real and not real. God is a symbol and reality itself. And because of this idea, people are now forced to think abstractly about the world. And it gives rise to money, nation state and science. Serves perfectly the imperial interests and now the Church is an important part of the Empire. People are now forced to think abstractly about the world. Whereas people before could think very concretely about the world.
After Jesus's death there were many groups and movements who considered themselves Christians, Gnostics being one of them. Not many people know that the first Christian state was not Catholic Rome, but a Gnostic one, Osroene, with its capital at Edessa in modern Turkey near the Syrian border. The Gnostic teacher, Bardesanes (or Bardaisan), converted King Abgar IX, who ruled 177-212. Bardesanes was credited by church fathers with inventing the Christian hymn and wrote 150 songs that were popular for generations. The most famous is the “Hymn of the Pearl,” a beautiful allegory of the soul being lost in the world and returning to God, found in The Acts of Thomas, an early 3rd century text. However, Roman empire made sure to use propaganda against Gnostics as heretics, which led Gnostics to be persecuted, killed and others to ran away. A small number of Gnostics survived such relentless persecutions. Once the Catholic faction received the official support of the Roman Emperor Constantine in 325, persecution of heretics intensified and the Gnostics went underground and faded away.
If we took a little effort to compare it to the paradoxes of what gnostics actually taught, your head would be spinning so fast you'd beg for the simplicity of diverse unity.
I accept that the church (I) must back out some significant language that we've encrusted onto the Scripture. I've done that. If you want to say Jesus never said he was God and is never called "Creator in the flesh", fine. That doesn't change who he is and who he said he is, which can be stated without any such language. I believe I linked you my article written as a concession to antitrinitarians, but I don't recall you commenting.
Do you believe the maxim of the law that the testimony of two or three is one? Because the Jews all knew this, and knew the concept of corporate unity, and their problem was not with those points. Millions of Jews accepted the Christian revelation in the first century, and millions of Jews rejected it on the grounds of fear that Jesus's apostles would upend their comfy synagogue lifestyles of sin. Jesus was not tried as an idolator but as a rabblerouser ("inciter").
Coming from a gnostic who believes that a Monad emanated fifteen male-female dyads, the last female of which birthed an evil demiurge without marital support but also without sin, that's projection. I told you that idea was Egyptian and literally comes from Kek, but you continue to take it seriously.
All you need to do is admit that the Monad is incomprehensible as a pure monism and recognize that the point of the first emanation, Logos, is to reveal something equal in every way to the Monad except where they are poles on one spectrum. If you accept that much, you believe in unity and diversity as well as, or better than, many trinitarians who don't know what they believe.
Good review. John Gill is correct that Remphan comes from Rephaim and Remphis and not other places. However, there's not evidence that the hexagram was introduced in Israel until around 300 AD.
The Star of Remphan comes straight from the wicked King Solomon who rejected the almighty creator, and summoned demons with his 666 hex engraved signet ring in effort to build his temple.
King solomon was a wicked demonologist that literally summoned 72 demons!
(1) The link shows that the real, original "star of Remphan" was the 8th-century BC "star of Chiun" (which is a pun BTW) and the most likely referent for that was the bronze Nehushtan serpent/seraph. It's possible that Solomon in his other idolatries edged Nehushtan toward its later idolatrous status, but that's quite a bit different from the legends around the star-being that, much later, associated it with hexagrams. (2) The hexagram, not seen in Israel until about 300 AD, was not associated with 666 until very recently; 666 most likely refers first to Caesar Nero and then to the Roman beast system. (3) The idea that Solomon had supernatural help in building the temple is present in the Bible and in tradition, but this would only be under Yahweh's control because it is unmistakable that the temple was designed to have no infiltration from spirits contrary to Yahweh. Solomon, for instance, calls on Sophia under the name of Hochma, but this is not the much later gnostic Sophia but only the wisdom of Yahweh as personified. (4) Solomon would have had a signet ring (perhaps passed down to Jehoiachin as the prophets suggest), but the association of this ring with the hexagram or a particular seal is much later in Arabic tradition. (5) Solomon would presumably have known about the 72 names taken to be encoded in Exodus at the Red Sea crossing; these were also taken as names of attributes of God, and only later associated with independent or malevolent spirits.
So these strands have become tied together in modern narrative, but the original case would've been quite a bit different. Without judging Solomon's character as good or bad in the whole, what would I conclude? Solomon may have promoted Nehushtan and permitted it to be associated with the name of Chiun and of Rephaim; he may have been associated with patterns of sixes (speculative), and the Holiest was certainly a golden cube; he called on Hochma and on supernatural assistance in building the temple, and may have known the 72 names regarded as spiritual conduits of such assistance; and he had a signet ring that may have taken on divine energy. Obviously he is known to have bowed down in syncretistic houses of worship constructed for idolatrous names, which is regarded as idolatry and a conflict of character taken from our distant perspective. The historical data don't give us the right to make dogmatic insistences or judgments on much more than that.
You affirm the Almighty Creator of the Garden of Eden. How can one find him without reliance upon the record kept by the covenant people of his Being?