I made him so mad he had to spin up a new alt
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (88)
sorted by:
So whether it infiltrated anything has absolutely no bearing on Christianity being true.
Wrong. What was brought in was hyper-dispensational polytheism.
"Ice turning into water is definitely because water magically turns into a different substance. Observable reality is wrong it isn't water, my myopic view must be right."
You underestimate God. There is absolutely zero basis for assuming the Trinity is polytheism. "My feeble human mind can't get it" =/= polytheism.
God as three is polytheism. God having a human son AS God is polytheism. Any more false assertions?
Why do you say his position is "God as three" or "God having a human son as God" when those words are not in any Bible?
Why do you say "To discover the name and the source from which it comes is to understand" if a name and a source are two? It's possible for a name and a source to be one, but two concepts are seen just like you have two eyes but are one person. How could there be a monism without any distinction in it? As soon as you conceive of it, you conceive that it is not what it isn't, and that means it is revealed as plurality at the same time as it is revealed in another aspect as monism.
You assume that gods or God HAVE to be one-person. There is no evidence of any kind for this. The Bible clearly teaches Trinitarian Monotheism. Trying to force your narrowminded, sad, cold assumptions borrowed from Islam isn't good. Remember, you are agreeing with nonbelievers by inplying God can only be one person. Humans are one person so they project their limited nature onto God!!