The modern Jews have no legitimate claim to the Israelite bloodline. They claim to have maternal lineage, but that's nothing according to the Torah, which says paternal lineage.
The Pharisees had the closest theology and nearly perfect bloodline.
Paul is an apostle of Christ, is from the tribe of Benjamin and was Roman citizen, Saul was a pharisee and Jesus set him straight. The bible, written by God through men, tells us all that and hides nothing, where do you get your false accusation?
Interesting question. Let me tell you a story, I was travelling from Jerusalem to Damascus one day. And all of a sudden I was blinded for three days after seeing a blinding light. So, my journey was interrupted when I saw this blinding light, and I started communicating directly with a divine voice. And the voice told me Paul "the apostle of Christ" was born Saul of Tarsus in 5 AD in Tarsus, Cilicia, then part of the Roman Empire (now South central Turkey).
And I was amazed. Then I heard another voice which said to me never mind about Paul, aka Saint Paul, aka Paul the Apostle, aka Saul of Tarsus... it's just a fictitious character. It was all made up.
What is false? and assuming you're saying Paul was not born Saul of Taurus, how do you know it's false? What historical or archeological evidence do you even have this man ever existed?
How about this: Paul of Tarsus, the so-called apostle to the Gentiles, the man credited with spreading Christianity across the Roman Empire, was not simply a convert or a missionary. What if I were to suggest to you he was an intelligence asset working on behalf of Roman imperial interests to neutralize the most dangerous threat the empire had ever faced, Jewish fanaticism?
Matthew 23:9 "And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven."
Are you saying that the Catholic Church are the new Pharisees?
The jews are the new (and old) Pharisees.
The modern Jews have no legitimate claim to the Israelite bloodline. They claim to have maternal lineage, but that's nothing according to the Torah, which says paternal lineage.
The Pharisees had the closest theology and nearly perfect bloodline.
“the Torah does not specifically state anywhere that maternal descent should be used to determine who is a Jew”. But the western Talmud written by the Ashkenazi western Jews does specify the Semitic maternal lineage as a condition to... https://gulfnews.com/opinion/op-eds/the-forbidden-truth-about-ashkenazis-1.1290955
Paul, the false apostle, was known as Saul of Taurus. He was devout Jew and a Pharisee.
Paul is an apostle of Christ, is from the tribe of Benjamin and was Roman citizen, Saul was a pharisee and Jesus set him straight. The bible, written by God through men, tells us all that and hides nothing, where do you get your false accusation?
Interesting question. Let me tell you a story, I was travelling from Jerusalem to Damascus one day. And all of a sudden I was blinded for three days after seeing a blinding light. So, my journey was interrupted when I saw this blinding light, and I started communicating directly with a divine voice. And the voice told me Paul "the apostle of Christ" was born Saul of Tarsus in 5 AD in Tarsus, Cilicia, then part of the Roman Empire (now South central Turkey).
And I was amazed. Then I heard another voice which said to me never mind about Paul, aka Saint Paul, aka Paul the Apostle, aka Saul of Tarsus... it's just a fictitious character. It was all made up.
False? How do you know? What's your standard of what is true or false?
What is false? and assuming you're saying Paul was not born Saul of Taurus, how do you know it's false? What historical or archeological evidence do you even have this man ever existed?
How about this: Paul of Tarsus, the so-called apostle to the Gentiles, the man credited with spreading Christianity across the Roman Empire, was not simply a convert or a missionary. What if I were to suggest to you he was an intelligence asset working on behalf of Roman imperial interests to neutralize the most dangerous threat the empire had ever faced, Jewish fanaticism?