The modern Jews have no legitimate claim to the Israelite bloodline. They claim to have maternal lineage, but that's nothing according to the Torah, which says paternal lineage.
The Pharisees had the closest theology and nearly perfect bloodline.
Paul is an apostle of Christ, is from the tribe of Benjamin and was Roman citizen, Saul was a pharisee and Jesus set him straight. The bible, written by God through men, tells us all that and hides nothing, where do you get your false accusation?
Interesting question. Let me tell you a story, I was travelling from Jerusalem to Damascus one day. And all of a sudden I was blinded for three days after seeing a blinding light. So, my journey was interrupted when I saw this blinding light, and I started communicating directly with a divine voice. And the voice told me Paul "the apostle of Christ" was born Saul of Tarsus in 5 AD in Tarsus, Cilicia, then part of the Roman Empire (now South central Turkey).
And I was amazed. Then I heard another voice which said to me never mind about Paul, aka Saint Paul, aka Paul the Apostle, aka Saul of Tarsus... it's just a fictitious character. It was all made up.
Two roads diverged in a yellow wood,
And sorry I could not travel both.
And be one traveler, long I stood
And looked down one as far as I could
To where it bent in the undergrowth;
Then took the other, as just as fair,
And having perhaps the better claim,
Because it was grassy and wanted wear;
Though as for that the passing there
Had worn them really about the same,
And both that morning equally lay
In leaves no step had trodden black.
Oh, I kept the first for another day!
Yet knowing how way leads on to way,
I doubted if I should ever come back.
I shall be telling this with a sigh
Somewhere ages and ages hence:
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I -
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference.
It seems you have some choice to make.
Either you believe God and the info He gave us or you believe the devils who do nothing but accuse.. I've made my choice.
What is false? and assuming you're saying Paul was not born Saul of Taurus, how do you know it's false? What historical or archeological evidence do you even have this man ever existed?
How about this: Paul of Tarsus, the so-called apostle to the Gentiles, the man credited with spreading Christianity across the Roman Empire, was not simply a convert or a missionary. What if I were to suggest to you he was an intelligence asset working on behalf of Roman imperial interests to neutralize the most dangerous threat the empire had ever faced, Jewish fanaticism?
The jews are the new (and old) Pharisees.
The modern Jews have no legitimate claim to the Israelite bloodline. They claim to have maternal lineage, but that's nothing according to the Torah, which says paternal lineage.
The Pharisees had the closest theology and nearly perfect bloodline.
“the Torah does not specifically state anywhere that maternal descent should be used to determine who is a Jew”. But the western Talmud written by the Ashkenazi western Jews does specify the Semitic maternal lineage as a condition to... https://gulfnews.com/opinion/op-eds/the-forbidden-truth-about-ashkenazis-1.1290955
Paul, the false apostle, was known as Saul of Taurus. He was devout Jew and a Pharisee.
Paul is an apostle of Christ, is from the tribe of Benjamin and was Roman citizen, Saul was a pharisee and Jesus set him straight. The bible, written by God through men, tells us all that and hides nothing, where do you get your false accusation?
Interesting question. Let me tell you a story, I was travelling from Jerusalem to Damascus one day. And all of a sudden I was blinded for three days after seeing a blinding light. So, my journey was interrupted when I saw this blinding light, and I started communicating directly with a divine voice. And the voice told me Paul "the apostle of Christ" was born Saul of Tarsus in 5 AD in Tarsus, Cilicia, then part of the Roman Empire (now South central Turkey).
And I was amazed. Then I heard another voice which said to me never mind about Paul, aka Saint Paul, aka Paul the Apostle, aka Saul of Tarsus... it's just a fictitious character. It was all made up.
What Paul did changed so many lives for the better. Let's see what good things you think atheism is supposed to bring.
The Road Not Taken by Robert Frost
Two roads diverged in a yellow wood,
And sorry I could not travel both.
And be one traveler, long I stood
And looked down one as far as I could
To where it bent in the undergrowth;
Then took the other, as just as fair,
And having perhaps the better claim,
Because it was grassy and wanted wear;
Though as for that the passing there
Had worn them really about the same,
And both that morning equally lay
In leaves no step had trodden black.
Oh, I kept the first for another day!
Yet knowing how way leads on to way,
I doubted if I should ever come back.
I shall be telling this with a sigh
Somewhere ages and ages hence:
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I -
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference.
It seems you have some choice to make.
Either you believe God and the info He gave us or you believe the devils who do nothing but accuse.. I've made my choice.
You got me there, I can't lie.
False? How do you know? What's your standard of what is true or false?
What is false? and assuming you're saying Paul was not born Saul of Taurus, how do you know it's false? What historical or archeological evidence do you even have this man ever existed?
How about this: Paul of Tarsus, the so-called apostle to the Gentiles, the man credited with spreading Christianity across the Roman Empire, was not simply a convert or a missionary. What if I were to suggest to you he was an intelligence asset working on behalf of Roman imperial interests to neutralize the most dangerous threat the empire had ever faced, Jewish fanaticism?
I meant when you called Paul "false".
We have more evidence of it than evidence for the belief natural-only abiogenesis happened.
Reductionistic argument. Also the Biblical Account doesn't line up with that. Romans attacked Christians, but God protected them from Romans.