What is false? and assuming you're saying Paul was not born Saul of Taurus, how do you know it's false? What historical or archeological evidence do you even have this man ever existed?
How about this: Paul of Tarsus, the so-called apostle to the Gentiles, the man credited with spreading Christianity across the Roman Empire, was not simply a convert or a missionary. What if I were to suggest to you he was an intelligence asset working on behalf of Roman imperial interests to neutralize the most dangerous threat the empire had ever faced, Jewish fanaticism?
False? How do you know? What's your standard of what is true or false?
What is false? and assuming you're saying Paul was not born Saul of Taurus, how do you know it's false? What historical or archeological evidence do you even have this man ever existed?
How about this: Paul of Tarsus, the so-called apostle to the Gentiles, the man credited with spreading Christianity across the Roman Empire, was not simply a convert or a missionary. What if I were to suggest to you he was an intelligence asset working on behalf of Roman imperial interests to neutralize the most dangerous threat the empire had ever faced, Jewish fanaticism?
I meant when you called Paul "false".
We have more evidence of it than evidence for the belief natural-only abiogenesis happened.
Reductionistic argument. Also the Biblical Account doesn't line up with that. Romans attacked Christians, but God protected them from Romans.