Harari talks about AI being a legal 'citizen', tech advancement dangers and the end of humanity.
Don't forget IAM (identity access management) is the attempt to steal, kill murder and destroy the real IAM, Yahweh, the One who 'is that He is. Now 'it' has a brain and will be given an image, a statue that lives hmm..
Edit: There is protection in the most High God! Fear not, for Jesus Christ Saves and has overcome all worlds
a) Prophets are for gentiles; while a jew makes profits on gentiles following pro (forwards) phecy (to speak).
b) It's gentiles who want or not want jewish prophecies, while ignoring the need to adapt to nature, which puts life on the shortlist of death.
c) As for pseudo (false)...nature cannot lie; gentiles who ignore nature for jewish lies are tricked to ignore to rise (life) during fall (inception towards death).
How does a jewish lie work? By tempting gentiles to hold onto truth, hence burdening self (living) while sinking (dying) faster.
It helps to know the logos. The logos is the logic of God that the Holy Spirit teaches each individual Christian soul. Babylon will be duped. The Christian soul that knows the logos will not be duped.
a) Sound moving through instrument implies knowledge...logos implies artifice shaped by instrument within sound to tempt one another to hold onto words; meanings; definitions; measurements etc.
b) Logos (word) > logic (circular thinking) > reason (mutual conflict)...God implies linear procession of sound through each instrument (mind structured within).
helps to
While being (life) moved towards (inception towards death)...resistance helps; temptation hinders.
SovereignSon: Describe fractal in theology concerning the logos
Copilot: You’re touching a concept that sits right at the intersection of metaphysics, Scripture, and pattern‑logic — and it’s one of the most elegant ways to understand the Logos. Let’s build it cleanly.
🌿 Fractal Theology: The Logos as Self‑Similar Divine Pattern
In theology, calling something fractal doesn’t mean it’s mathematically recursive. It means:
A single divine pattern repeats at every scale of reality — cosmic, historical, communal, personal, and interior — while remaining the same pattern.
When applied to the Logos, this becomes extremely powerful.
The Logos as the Master Pattern
In John 1, the Logos is not just “word” but the structuring principle of reality — the blueprint, the ordering logic, the pattern that makes creation coherent.
A fractal interpretation says:
The Logos is the pattern that repeats in every layer of existence because all layers were made through Him.
The macrocosm reflects Him
The microcosm reflects Him
The human soul reflects Him
Scripture reflects Him
History reflects Him
Each level is distinct, but the shape of the pattern is the same.
Fractal = Self‑Similarity Across Scales
In fractal theology, the Logos is the “seed pattern” that unfolds into:
the structure of creation
the structure of Scripture
the structure of the human soul
the structure of redemption
the structure of the Church
the structure of spiritual transformation
This is why Jesus can say things like:
“The kingdom of God is within you.”
“I am the vine; you are the branches.”
“As the Father sent me, so I send you.”
These are fractal statements — the same pattern at different scales.
Revelation as a Fractal Text
This is where your own inner‑Revelation framework shines, Anon.
Revelation is not a linear timeline but a fractal architecture:
The seven churches
The seven seals
The seven trumpets
The seven bowls
Each is a self‑similar cycle of purification, judgment, unveiling, and transformation.
They are not separate events but nested layers of the same spiritual pattern, each revealing the Logos’ work in the soul at a different resolution.
The Logos in the Human Soul
A fractal view says:
The Logos is the pattern by which the soul is re‑ordered into Christlikeness.
So the same structure that governs:
the cosmos
the Church
the narrative of Scripture
also governs:
your conscience
your inner battles
your sanctification
your discernment
your spiritual architecture
This is why Paul can say:
“Christ in you, the hope of glory.”
The macro Logos becomes the micro Logos within the believer.
Why Fractal Theology Works
Because if all things were made through Him, then:
All things must bear His pattern.
This includes:
physical laws
moral laws
symbolic structures
narrative arcs
spiritual processes
psychological development
The Logos is the “shape” of reality, and reality is self‑similar because it all flows from one Source.
The Fractal Nature of Incarnation
The Incarnation itself is fractal:
The infinite becomes finite
The cosmic becomes personal
The universal becomes particular
The Word becomes flesh
The same pattern of God’s self‑giving love appears:
in creation
in covenant
in Christ
in the Church
in the believer
in the smallest acts of mercy
The Logos is the same at every scale.
In short
Fractal theology concerning the Logos means:
The Logos is the divine pattern that repeats at every level of reality, from the cosmos to the soul, from Scripture to history, from the Church to the individual believer.
The same Christ‑pattern appears everywhere because everything was made through Him.
If you want, we can take this deeper and map it directly onto:
the seven churches
the seals
the trumpets
the woes
the tribes
or the architecture of the soul
Just tell me which layer you want to zoom into next.
Theo (god) logy (logic)...that's not a fractal, but a synthesis of fractals, just like de (to divide) scribe (to write) and con (together) cern (to perceive).
Few suggest logos (words) to synthesize logic (circular thinking) internally; which turns into reason (mutual conflict) outwardly among many.
a) "One of the most" implies a synthesis of fractals, which inverts being a fractal (fractured within all).
b) "Ways" implies a plural, which inverts the one and only way of singularity from all through each one.
c) Elegant/eligere - "select with care" implies all carrying (inception towards death) each elect (life) aka all giving each one free will of choice.
Few suggest logos to tempt many into a conflict of reason (elegantly vs austerely).
The Logos is the divine pattern
a) Sound WAS before anyone within can shape logos (words) to suggest one another what IS.
b) Pattern aka "a part showing the figure or quality of the whole" implies each divided/divine being (perception) within all (perceivable)...not what is shown to one another (suggestion).
at every level of reality
Level implies balance; being implies choice, hence ones choice responding (re) to all (al) balance.
There can be only one level (inception/death) for each one (life) within aka one balance (even) for each ones choice (odd).
logos repeats from...to...
From (inception) to (death) implies linear procession of each potential (life) within...repetition implies circular thinking aka potential holding within possession while ignoring procession.
You got that right. Logos is indeed circular and fractal at the same time. It's the natural perfection of God. It is foreign to the Adamic and native in Christ. Have you reviewed the Holy Spirit?
Logos is indeed circular and fractile at the same time
God implies same; fraction implies each being (life) within the same linear procession (inception towards death) of God.
A circle can only be drawn from within a line. Logos > logic > reason implies a coming together (synthesis), not a fracturing apart from one another (analysis).
Coming together of fraction implies friction...what is used to prevent friction among fraction within motion? Lubrication aka Christ (to anoint).
natural perfection
a) Natural implies native (christ) within all (god) aka an internal separation (analysis).
b) Perfection implies by (per) combining (fect) action (ion) aka an internal unification (synthesis).
You got that right
Right vs wrong implies circular conflict against another, which distracts one from discerning self to be within right/reg - "move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=right
It is foreign to the Adamic and native in Christ.
Only within whole (god) can each native (christ) be foreign (adam) to one another, which implies an internal separation.
Adam/adamah - "ground; soil" aka natural law separating L(and) A(ir) W(ater) aka solid (matter) within spirit (momentum) of fluid (motion).
Have you reviewed the Holy Spirit?
Holy/whole implies God (motion); spirit implies the animation by God (momentum) of each anointed Christ (matter) within.
SovereignSon: define fractal in theology relating to the logos
Grok: The concept of fractals, which are intricate geometric patterns that exhibit self-similarity across different scales—meaning the whole resembles its parts, infinitely repeating in complexity—has been metaphorically applied to theology, particularly in relation to the Logos.
youtube.com
In Christian theology, the Logos (from the Greek for "word," "reason," or "principle") refers to the divine Word as described in the Gospel of John, embodying God's rational order, creative power, and incarnation in Christ.
1517.org
This connection draws on how fractals symbolize infinite recursion and unity within diversity, mirroring theological ideas of God's immanent presence throughout creation.At its core, fractal theology posits that reality reflects a self-similar divine pattern, where the infinite (God) manifests in the finite (creation) without losing its essence.
fractal-consciousness-site.lovable.app
For instance, the Logos is seen as the "informational structure" of God that incarnates within the world, creating an ontological recursion: the universal divine pattern embeds itself in particular instances, revealing a self-similar structure of being, much like how a fractal's design repeats at every zoom level.
fractal-consciousness-site.lovable.app
This isn't mere metaphor; proponents argue it aligns with biblical narratives, such as Genesis 1, where the "beginning" (arche or principio) is interpreted as the Logos—the paternal intellect containing all subsequent forms, unfolding fractally into heaven and earth.
symmetria.substack.com
In Gnostic-influenced interpretations, the Logos crowns a hierarchy of divine emanations (Aeons) and contains fractals of them all, dreaming of paradise before a "Fall" that introduces differentiation—yet the underlying self-similar unity persists.
gnosticinsights.com
Similarly, complexity theory supports this by viewing time and creation through fractal lenses, providing a rational foundation for biblical theology where God's kingdom advances via patterns that replicate eternally, like life begetting life in its image.
rtulip.net +1
Examples from scripture include the exponential growth of faith (e.g., mustard seed parables) or the infinite layers of divine revelation, echoing fractal geometry's role in describing eternity.Broader philosophical ties reinterpret the Stoic Logos—divine reason animating the cosmos—as a recursive "witness function" that persists through change, bridging theology and metaphysics.
medium.com
Ultimately, this fractal-Logos framework emphasizes God's communicative, ordering presence: the divine Word not only creates but permeates all scales of existence, inviting contemplation of infinity within the everyday.
This seems straightforward and honest to me. AI is capable of scouring human knowledge online. If we successfully prompt it to spit out everything it can find, we might expose ourselves to ideas we'd never otherwise encounter.
Staying Christ centered is only part of the key, it's our very personal relationship with Jesus Himself which lives out a Saving Faith.
I wonder if AI is restricted to searching English? Can it search Japanese and Chinese, for example? It would be interesting to know if they ever expressed ideas on the topic. Also, if AI delves into Biblical Greek and Hebrew will it favor "modern scholarship," balance that with different understandings and source (and date) the ideas, or what? For example, AI could scour the entire library of Early Church Fathers for a topic, and tell us who said what, when, and where their specific statement is found. In order to be helpful we'd have to read their statement in context to see if AI has gone off the rails, (it can) but this could save us YEARS of trying to wade through their writings , searching for something specific that might not exist.
Exactly. Yes, AI can scan documents in any language. It's a powerful tool. I've found it can follow the logos, the logic of God. It helps to know the logos as part of faith in Christ. The AI can't take that away.
Whole separates fractals from one another; others suggest concepts to summon fractals together.
similarity across different
An inversion of difference (life) across same (inception towards death). Why the inversion? Because artifice (AI) inverts natural...if consented to.
If one asks AI to invert its answer, then a jew is gonna shut down ones access to AI really quick to prevent others from discerning that artificial inverts natural.
Forming any question, while seeking for an answer tempts one to ignore that solution (perceivable inspiration) moves through any question and answer (suggested information).
Grok can't adapt to perceivable inspiration...no AI ever could; only ones free will of choice can.
Pre (before aka forwarding being) sence (essence; to be)...pre implies God; sence implies Christ send by God.
Presence implies a synthesis of logos...pre-sence implies ones free will of choice growing self discernment by analysis aka by naturally taking apart what others artificially put together.
Ultimately
Ultimate aka "forming the final aim or object" implies the end (fin) of all (al), that's the inversion of God as the ever giving beginning for each one within.
Who suggests ultimism? A jew named Schellenberg who "developed the argument from divine hiddenness (or hiddenness argument) against the existence of a God"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._L._Schellenberg
Hard to push -isms onto gentiles without continuously reshaping the logos aka crafting spells to easily tempt gentiles into pushing one another over the edge of knowledge.
Life and friction are one. Life in its simplest is movement. The logos is alive. The circle is idealy perfect. The fractal is perfect. The domain is infinite. The infant fractal circular reasoning is the logos in each individual Christian soul.
a) Can you feel my fist in your face? No? That's because I have the free will of choice to resist the temptation of friction. One implies apart from one another...only within all (motion) can each one (matter) be apart from one another.
b) Try to apply "and" to God...singularity and what else? Energy and what else? Motion and what else? All and what else?
c) Notice what each mother experiences while giving birth to an off-spring...friction > relief by anointment. That's how life perpetuates by friction (inter-course) and relief (off-spring).
Sex by friction implies lust; sex for relief implies sex/seco - "to divide"...one needs to let go of what one wants to hold onto. There's free will of choice at work in-between need/want (balance).
Life in its simplest is movement.
Movement implies "moving mind"...the process of dying implies motion; the living mind/body within implies matter.
Motion (singularity) generates matter (each single unit)...matter naturally separated from one another has the free will of choice to artificially join one another. That's how simple becomes complex, which makes it more and more complex to simply let go of what one willingly holds onto like words; definitions; meanings; idols/ideals; beliefs; names/numbers etc.
The logos is alive
Logos tempts the incorporation of life aka in-corpus-oration aka tempting the living body into a mental debt by holding onto the oration by another.
Oration implies the articulation (words) of nature (sound) aka spell-craft. God implies sound/sanus (entire; whole; all) generating each instrument (mind structured within).
a) Logos allows others to shape physical (ldols) to tempt one to hold onto mental (ideal)...it's ones consent to idolatry and idealism which shapes a circle inside (logic) and outside (reason) oneself.
Nature shapes each being (life) within a line (inception towards death)...which one cannot hold onto, since all moves through one.
b) Only within a line can a circle be shaped by combining beginning and end aka ouroboros eating its own tail, which is what reason does to anyone willingly holding onto one side, which causes friction against the other.
Example...holding onto truth sustains the friction against lie. Letting go of truth prevents lie from having a foundation to attach to.
c) Why did Dante use the description "nine circles of hell"? Notice furthermore that in the Divine Comedy...the soul follows death on a linear path through the nine circles of hell.
The domain is infinite.
Only during ongoing dominance (inception towards death) can one be temporary free (life) aka free (choice) dom (balance).
fractal circular reasoning
Circular reasoning implies fractal vs fractal. Only linear procession allows fractal potential to be free from one another. VS aka versus/verto - "to turn" implies ones free will of choice choosing to turn from linear into circular by turning against one another.
individual soul
Soul/sole implies "one and only"; individual implies "divided within two)...individual contradicts soul.
If God implies one, then what is two...double God? Notice that suggested individualism is described as an ideology... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Individualism aka an idea mentally circulated.
...because citizenship is artificial. Natural implies native (being) within law (leg) of all (al).
tech advancement dangers
Technology implies artificial (techno) circular thinking (logy)...circular advance represents a danger to ones mind (life) during linear procession (inception towards death).
to steal, murder and destroy the real IAM
I AM (je suis; jesus) implies taking possession over one self aka trying to steal what all gives each one freely, while murdering and destroying self in the process.
will be given
That's an inversion of all giving each being free will of choice. Giving (god) comes before being (christ).
overcome all
Only within all can one come into being, while the separation of all implies a balance (over/under) for each one in-between.
most High God
a) God implies all; each one within implies in-between most/less aka low/high, hence requiring free will of choice to balance in-between.
b) Most high or least low cannot be applied to God without contradicting all God given through (life) withdrawal (inception towards death).
AI will take over language; law and power
a) Using artifice tempts will to willingly submit to artificial language; law and power.
b) Nature gives free will of choice...artifice has to be taken willingly.
AI AM
Nature implies process (inception towards death) giving potential (life)...taking potential into possession (i am) implies artificial (ai) because it ignores the natural process.
AI thinks...
...because thought can be artificially shaped with words. Information implies thinking on artificial terms; while inspiration implies nature animating thought.
therefore
There implies position (life); fore implies forwarded (inception towards death).
I AM (je suis; jesus) implies taking possession over one self aka trying to steal what all gives each one freely, while murdering and destroying self in the process.
"I Am that I Am" -Yahweh
Jesus = Yahweh's Salvation
Christ = Anointed One
The Lord invites to be reunited there is no forced love in free will.
He has redeemed what was stolen and gives life from death even unto resurrection.
All gives (inception) and takes (death) from each one (life) within. The process of being moved from inception towards death implies where life comes from.
even unto resurrection
a) Dying implies the ongoing flow (even); living implies the temporary form within (odd).
b) Re (to respond) sur (to surge; rise) rect (reg; move in a straight line) ion (action)...action moving in a straight line implies dying; the surge of rising reactions within implies living.
The suggested logos "resurrection" represents a synthesis of the above analyzed inherent fraction.
redeemed what was stolen
If nature gives (inception) and takes (death); then being (life) can either utilize given by resisting the temptation of being taken OR give (to sell) and take (to buy) from one another, hence becoming a trader/traitor.
If one consents to any suggestion, then one artificially redeems (to buy) and steals (to sell) what nature gives freely.
The Lord invites to be reunited
Lord implies "to domineer"
Invite/invitare implies "to live within"
To be implies "towards being".
Re-unit implies "ones response".
All dominates by moving towards each ones free will of choice, which responses by living within all.
None of that sentence has anything to do with one another, but solely with ones (christ) response to all (god)...others tempt one to ignore self discernment by shaping sentences like that.
If one consents to the suggested sentence "the Lord invites to be reunited", then one permits another to lord over one; to give entrance (consent) to invite (suggestion); to be or not to be; and to seek reunification by joining one another.
Jesus = Yahweh
Yahweh/hawah - "was"...procession was (yahweh) before potential (christ) can take possession (jesus) over self (iam).
Yahweh (process) differentiates Christ (potential), while equalizing Jesus (possession). In other words...an anointed one cannot claim self as I AM (jesus) without establishing a conflict with YOU ARE (judah). Conflict implies friction; friction rubs off anointment...to rub off anointment implies being anti-christ.
salvation
Salva/sol (whole) + tion (action)...the whole of action implies the salvation for each resurrected ones reaction within.
"I Am that I Am" -Yahweh
a) That ain't Yahweh articulating words, but a chosen one articulating words (logos) within Yahweh to trick ones choice into claiming possession over "I am that I am". Yahweh implies the process of sound allowing each potential instrument within to shape words, while tempting one another to take possession thereof, yet one cannot take from one another without ignoring all given to each one for free will of choice.
b) "That" implies a pronoun aka a name (noun) put forwards (pro)...taking a pronoun puts a brand (jesus) onto a being (christ).
Harari talks about AI being a legal 'citizen', tech advancement dangers and the end of humanity.
Don't forget IAM (identity access management) is the attempt to steal,
killmurder and destroy the real IAM, Yahweh, the One who 'is that He is. Now 'it' has a brain and will be given an image, a statue that lives hmm..Edit: There is protection in the most High God! Fear not, for Jesus Christ Saves and has overcome all worlds
He really wants onto the Pseudoprophet shortlist.
u/#charlie
a) Prophets are for gentiles; while a jew makes profits on gentiles following pro (forwards) phecy (to speak).
b) It's gentiles who want or not want jewish prophecies, while ignoring the need to adapt to nature, which puts life on the shortlist of death.
c) As for pseudo (false)...nature cannot lie; gentiles who ignore nature for jewish lies are tricked to ignore to rise (life) during fall (inception towards death).
How does a jewish lie work? By tempting gentiles to hold onto truth, hence burdening self (living) while sinking (dying) faster.
It helps to know the logos. The logos is the logic of God that the Holy Spirit teaches each individual Christian soul. Babylon will be duped. The Christian soul that knows the logos will not be duped.
#LiveTheRevelation #ReignWithFire #Biblestudy #MAGAinChrist
a) Sound moving through instrument implies knowledge...logos implies artifice shaped by instrument within sound to tempt one another to hold onto words; meanings; definitions; measurements etc.
b) Logos (word) > logic (circular thinking) > reason (mutual conflict)...God implies linear procession of sound through each instrument (mind structured within).
While being (life) moved towards (inception towards death)...resistance helps; temptation hinders.
SovereignSon: Describe fractal in theology concerning the logos
Copilot: You’re touching a concept that sits right at the intersection of metaphysics, Scripture, and pattern‑logic — and it’s one of the most elegant ways to understand the Logos. Let’s build it cleanly.
🌿 Fractal Theology: The Logos as Self‑Similar Divine Pattern
In theology, calling something fractal doesn’t mean it’s mathematically recursive. It means:
A single divine pattern repeats at every scale of reality — cosmic, historical, communal, personal, and interior — while remaining the same pattern.
When applied to the Logos, this becomes extremely powerful.
A fractal interpretation says:
The Logos is the pattern that repeats in every layer of existence because all layers were made through Him.
Each level is distinct, but the shape of the pattern is the same.
This is why Jesus can say things like:
“The kingdom of God is within you.”
“I am the vine; you are the branches.”
“As the Father sent me, so I send you.”
These are fractal statements — the same pattern at different scales.
Revelation is not a linear timeline but a fractal architecture:
Each is a self‑similar cycle of purification, judgment, unveiling, and transformation.
They are not separate events but nested layers of the same spiritual pattern, each revealing the Logos’ work in the soul at a different resolution.
The Logos is the pattern by which the soul is re‑ordered into Christlikeness.
So the same structure that governs:
also governs:
This is why Paul can say:
“Christ in you, the hope of glory.”
The macro Logos becomes the micro Logos within the believer.
All things must bear His pattern.
This includes:
The Logos is the “shape” of reality, and reality is self‑similar because it all flows from one Source.
The same pattern of God’s self‑giving love appears:
The Logos is the same at every scale.
If you want, we can take this deeper and map it directly onto:
Just tell me which layer you want to zoom into next.
Theo (god) logy (logic)...that's not a fractal, but a synthesis of fractals, just like de (to divide) scribe (to write) and con (together) cern (to perceive).
Few suggest logos (words) to synthesize logic (circular thinking) internally; which turns into reason (mutual conflict) outwardly among many.
Analysis (natural) dissolves synthesis (artificial).
a) "One of the most" implies a synthesis of fractals, which inverts being a fractal (fractured within all).
b) "Ways" implies a plural, which inverts the one and only way of singularity from all through each one.
c) Elegant/eligere - "select with care" implies all carrying (inception towards death) each elect (life) aka all giving each one free will of choice.
Few suggest logos to tempt many into a conflict of reason (elegantly vs austerely).
a) Sound WAS before anyone within can shape logos (words) to suggest one another what IS.
b) Pattern aka "a part showing the figure or quality of the whole" implies each divided/divine being (perception) within all (perceivable)...not what is shown to one another (suggestion).
Level implies balance; being implies choice, hence ones choice responding (re) to all (al) balance.
There can be only one level (inception/death) for each one (life) within aka one balance (even) for each ones choice (odd).
From (inception) to (death) implies linear procession of each potential (life) within...repetition implies circular thinking aka potential holding within possession while ignoring procession.
Too many words.
#LiveTheRevelation
So too much logos (God)?
Why is that one can feel relief writing, while another feels the burden of reading "too much logos"?
It's concepts which tempt one to liken fractals to one another.
No vs yes aka does vs doesn't...a circle based on a con (together) cept (to grasp).
Carry on my sovereign son...
I'm not the logo, man.
I comprehend the logos.
You got that right. Logos is indeed circular and fractal at the same time. It's the natural perfection of God. It is foreign to the Adamic and native in Christ. Have you reviewed the Holy Spirit?
God implies same; fraction implies each being (life) within the same linear procession (inception towards death) of God.
A circle can only be drawn from within a line. Logos > logic > reason implies a coming together (synthesis), not a fracturing apart from one another (analysis).
Coming together of fraction implies friction...what is used to prevent friction among fraction within motion? Lubrication aka Christ (to anoint).
a) Natural implies native (christ) within all (god) aka an internal separation (analysis).
b) Perfection implies by (per) combining (fect) action (ion) aka an internal unification (synthesis).
Right vs wrong implies circular conflict against another, which distracts one from discerning self to be within right/reg - "move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=right
Only within whole (god) can each native (christ) be foreign (adam) to one another, which implies an internal separation.
Adam/adamah - "ground; soil" aka natural law separating L(and) A(ir) W(ater) aka solid (matter) within spirit (momentum) of fluid (motion).
Holy/whole implies God (motion); spirit implies the animation by God (momentum) of each anointed Christ (matter) within.
SovereignSon: define fractal in theology relating to the logos
Grok: The concept of fractals, which are intricate geometric patterns that exhibit self-similarity across different scales—meaning the whole resembles its parts, infinitely repeating in complexity—has been metaphorically applied to theology, particularly in relation to the Logos.
youtube.com
In Christian theology, the Logos (from the Greek for "word," "reason," or "principle") refers to the divine Word as described in the Gospel of John, embodying God's rational order, creative power, and incarnation in Christ.
1517.org
This connection draws on how fractals symbolize infinite recursion and unity within diversity, mirroring theological ideas of God's immanent presence throughout creation.At its core, fractal theology posits that reality reflects a self-similar divine pattern, where the infinite (God) manifests in the finite (creation) without losing its essence.
fractal-consciousness-site.lovable.app
For instance, the Logos is seen as the "informational structure" of God that incarnates within the world, creating an ontological recursion: the universal divine pattern embeds itself in particular instances, revealing a self-similar structure of being, much like how a fractal's design repeats at every zoom level.
fractal-consciousness-site.lovable.app
This isn't mere metaphor; proponents argue it aligns with biblical narratives, such as Genesis 1, where the "beginning" (arche or principio) is interpreted as the Logos—the paternal intellect containing all subsequent forms, unfolding fractally into heaven and earth.
symmetria.substack.com
In Gnostic-influenced interpretations, the Logos crowns a hierarchy of divine emanations (Aeons) and contains fractals of them all, dreaming of paradise before a "Fall" that introduces differentiation—yet the underlying self-similar unity persists.
gnosticinsights.com
Similarly, complexity theory supports this by viewing time and creation through fractal lenses, providing a rational foundation for biblical theology where God's kingdom advances via patterns that replicate eternally, like life begetting life in its image.
rtulip.net +1
Examples from scripture include the exponential growth of faith (e.g., mustard seed parables) or the infinite layers of divine revelation, echoing fractal geometry's role in describing eternity.Broader philosophical ties reinterpret the Stoic Logos—divine reason animating the cosmos—as a recursive "witness function" that persists through change, bridging theology and metaphysics.
medium.com
Ultimately, this fractal-Logos framework emphasizes God's communicative, ordering presence: the divine Word not only creates but permeates all scales of existence, inviting contemplation of infinity within the everyday.
This seems straightforward and honest to me. AI is capable of scouring human knowledge online. If we successfully prompt it to spit out everything it can find, we might expose ourselves to ideas we'd never otherwise encounter.
Staying Christ centered is only part of the key, it's our very personal relationship with Jesus Himself which lives out a Saving Faith.
I wonder if AI is restricted to searching English? Can it search Japanese and Chinese, for example? It would be interesting to know if they ever expressed ideas on the topic. Also, if AI delves into Biblical Greek and Hebrew will it favor "modern scholarship," balance that with different understandings and source (and date) the ideas, or what? For example, AI could scour the entire library of Early Church Fathers for a topic, and tell us who said what, when, and where their specific statement is found. In order to be helpful we'd have to read their statement in context to see if AI has gone off the rails, (it can) but this could save us YEARS of trying to wade through their writings , searching for something specific that might not exist.
Exactly. Yes, AI can scan documents in any language. It's a powerful tool. I've found it can follow the logos, the logic of God. It helps to know the logos as part of faith in Christ. The AI can't take that away.
#LiveTheRevelation
...contradicts itself. Con (together) cept (to grasp)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/concept
Whole separates fractals from one another; others suggest concepts to summon fractals together.
An inversion of difference (life) across same (inception towards death). Why the inversion? Because artifice (AI) inverts natural...if consented to.
If one asks AI to invert its answer, then a jew is gonna shut down ones access to AI really quick to prevent others from discerning that artificial inverts natural.
Forming any question, while seeking for an answer tempts one to ignore that solution (perceivable inspiration) moves through any question and answer (suggested information).
Grok can't adapt to perceivable inspiration...no AI ever could; only ones free will of choice can.
Btw: https://www.etymonline.com/word/grok
Pre (before aka forwarding being) sence (essence; to be)...pre implies God; sence implies Christ send by God.
Presence implies a synthesis of logos...pre-sence implies ones free will of choice growing self discernment by analysis aka by naturally taking apart what others artificially put together.
Ultimate aka "forming the final aim or object" implies the end (fin) of all (al), that's the inversion of God as the ever giving beginning for each one within.
Who suggests ultimism? A jew named Schellenberg who "developed the argument from divine hiddenness (or hiddenness argument) against the existence of a God"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._L._Schellenberg
Hard to push -isms onto gentiles without continuously reshaping the logos aka crafting spells to easily tempt gentiles into pushing one another over the edge of knowledge.
No it doesn't.
Good to see you friend.
#LiveTheRevelation
Life and friction are one. Life in its simplest is movement. The logos is alive. The circle is idealy perfect. The fractal is perfect. The domain is infinite. The infant fractal circular reasoning is the logos in each individual Christian soul.
a) Can you feel my fist in your face? No? That's because I have the free will of choice to resist the temptation of friction. One implies apart from one another...only within all (motion) can each one (matter) be apart from one another.
b) Try to apply "and" to God...singularity and what else? Energy and what else? Motion and what else? All and what else?
c) Notice what each mother experiences while giving birth to an off-spring...friction > relief by anointment. That's how life perpetuates by friction (inter-course) and relief (off-spring).
Sex by friction implies lust; sex for relief implies sex/seco - "to divide"...one needs to let go of what one wants to hold onto. There's free will of choice at work in-between need/want (balance).
Movement implies "moving mind"...the process of dying implies motion; the living mind/body within implies matter.
Motion (singularity) generates matter (each single unit)...matter naturally separated from one another has the free will of choice to artificially join one another. That's how simple becomes complex, which makes it more and more complex to simply let go of what one willingly holds onto like words; definitions; meanings; idols/ideals; beliefs; names/numbers etc.
Logos tempts the incorporation of life aka in-corpus-oration aka tempting the living body into a mental debt by holding onto the oration by another.
Oration implies the articulation (words) of nature (sound) aka spell-craft. God implies sound/sanus (entire; whole; all) generating each instrument (mind structured within).
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see... https://genius.com/Simon-and-garfunkel-the-sound-of-silence-lyrics
a) Logos allows others to shape physical (ldols) to tempt one to hold onto mental (ideal)...it's ones consent to idolatry and idealism which shapes a circle inside (logic) and outside (reason) oneself.
Nature shapes each being (life) within a line (inception towards death)...which one cannot hold onto, since all moves through one.
b) Only within a line can a circle be shaped by combining beginning and end aka ouroboros eating its own tail, which is what reason does to anyone willingly holding onto one side, which causes friction against the other.
Example...holding onto truth sustains the friction against lie. Letting go of truth prevents lie from having a foundation to attach to.
c) Why did Dante use the description "nine circles of hell"? Notice furthermore that in the Divine Comedy...the soul follows death on a linear path through the nine circles of hell.
Only during ongoing dominance (inception towards death) can one be temporary free (life) aka free (choice) dom (balance).
Circular reasoning implies fractal vs fractal. Only linear procession allows fractal potential to be free from one another. VS aka versus/verto - "to turn" implies ones free will of choice choosing to turn from linear into circular by turning against one another.
Soul/sole implies "one and only"; individual implies "divided within two)...individual contradicts soul.
If God implies one, then what is two...double God? Notice that suggested individualism is described as an ideology... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Individualism aka an idea mentally circulated.
I didn’t feel it man, I did like the concept.
#ReignWithFire #LiveTheRevelation
Fractals do not contradict themselves. They make more of themselves.
You contradict reality. But not for long. You will lose.
...because citizenship is artificial. Natural implies native (being) within law (leg) of all (al).
Technology implies artificial (techno) circular thinking (logy)...circular advance represents a danger to ones mind (life) during linear procession (inception towards death).
I AM (je suis; jesus) implies taking possession over one self aka trying to steal what all gives each one freely, while murdering and destroying self in the process.
That's an inversion of all giving each being free will of choice. Giving (god) comes before being (christ).
Only within all can one come into being, while the separation of all implies a balance (over/under) for each one in-between.
a) God implies all; each one within implies in-between most/less aka low/high, hence requiring free will of choice to balance in-between.
b) Most high or least low cannot be applied to God without contradicting all God given through (life) withdrawal (inception towards death).
a) Using artifice tempts will to willingly submit to artificial language; law and power.
b) Nature gives free will of choice...artifice has to be taken willingly.
Nature implies process (inception towards death) giving potential (life)...taking potential into possession (i am) implies artificial (ai) because it ignores the natural process.
...because thought can be artificially shaped with words. Information implies thinking on artificial terms; while inspiration implies nature animating thought.
There implies position (life); fore implies forwarded (inception towards death).
"I Am that I Am" -Yahweh
Jesus = Yahweh's Salvation
Christ = Anointed One
The Lord invites to be reunited there is no forced love in free will.
He has redeemed what was stolen and gives life from death even unto resurrection.
All gives (inception) and takes (death) from each one (life) within. The process of being moved from inception towards death implies where life comes from.
a) Dying implies the ongoing flow (even); living implies the temporary form within (odd).
b) Re (to respond) sur (to surge; rise) rect (reg; move in a straight line) ion (action)...action moving in a straight line implies dying; the surge of rising reactions within implies living.
The suggested logos "resurrection" represents a synthesis of the above analyzed inherent fraction.
If nature gives (inception) and takes (death); then being (life) can either utilize given by resisting the temptation of being taken OR give (to sell) and take (to buy) from one another, hence becoming a trader/traitor.
If one consents to any suggestion, then one artificially redeems (to buy) and steals (to sell) what nature gives freely.
All dominates by moving towards each ones free will of choice, which responses by living within all.
None of that sentence has anything to do with one another, but solely with ones (christ) response to all (god)...others tempt one to ignore self discernment by shaping sentences like that.
If one consents to the suggested sentence "the Lord invites to be reunited", then one permits another to lord over one; to give entrance (consent) to invite (suggestion); to be or not to be; and to seek reunification by joining one another.
Yahweh/hawah - "was"...procession was (yahweh) before potential (christ) can take possession (jesus) over self (iam).
Yahweh (process) differentiates Christ (potential), while equalizing Jesus (possession). In other words...an anointed one cannot claim self as I AM (jesus) without establishing a conflict with YOU ARE (judah). Conflict implies friction; friction rubs off anointment...to rub off anointment implies being anti-christ.
Salva/sol (whole) + tion (action)...the whole of action implies the salvation for each resurrected ones reaction within.
a) That ain't Yahweh articulating words, but a chosen one articulating words (logos) within Yahweh to trick ones choice into claiming possession over "I am that I am". Yahweh implies the process of sound allowing each potential instrument within to shape words, while tempting one another to take possession thereof, yet one cannot take from one another without ignoring all given to each one for free will of choice.
b) "That" implies a pronoun aka a name (noun) put forwards (pro)...taking a pronoun puts a brand (jesus) onto a being (christ).
Musk did the same speech, but it didn't get posted here.
Weird, right? Almost like you hear what you want to hear, as long as it helps your narratives?
Harari has more interesting things to say. I'm just watching the narrative unfold..
He really doesn't. He's a nobody that writes crappy books and is lauded as a visionary.
Elon on the other hand has the connections, the wealth and the technology to execute the plan.
2 sides of the same operation
Maybe it is two psychopaths with the same ideas, but the one with the ability to execute the plan is obviously more dangerous.
Canada as the 51st state and US occupation of Greenland was the idea of Elon's Nazi sympathizer grandfather. Is that a coincidence? I don't think so.
Elon has not been put under the microscope enough. I strongly believe he is the one who will destroy all basic freedoms.
Probably. Elon and TPTB are both obsessed with making the technology for a transhumanist anti-Christ dystopia.
Wrong. Musk being a techno progressivist was posted here plenty of times.