Twisted eara correlate to high rate of loxism
(media.scored.co)
Comments (25)
sorted by:
from which book is that profile comparison??
I did the vetting work for you, because I know neo-nazis are lazy and emotionally driven rather than logical.
Here is the Queen of Denmark as an example. Depending on the subtle tilt of her head, that line from eye to ear changes
From Gentile: https://www.gettyimages.com.au/detail/news-photo/queen-margrethe-ii-of-denmark-visits-the-local-market-on-news-photo/82229611
To Jew: https://www.gettyimages.com.au/detail/news-photo/queen-margrethe-ii-of-denmark-visits-the-local-market-on-news-photo/82229559
So ignoring for a moment the lack of any meaningful sample size comparison in this science, you also need to standardize head title and neck position.
The second best kind of cope.
Yep, more emotionally driven nonsense. Typical shill.
LOL
Not the skull shape pseudo-science again...
Are you implying races and certain phenotypes aren't causally related to IQ?
I'm implying skull shape obsession is pseudo-scientific nonsense.
You can look around in real life and see if people's skulls match these Nazi cartoons. They don't.
Throughout all history people have acknowledged that physical appearance does tell a lot about the character of people. There's a lot of bs sure, but waving it all away by calling it a nazi idea and pseudoscience is equally dumb as going by it a 100%.
You're shifting goalposts to a much more general statement.
This fake science I've seen in nazi propaganda such as "black person == small forehead == no brain" is absurd. If you only know a handful of black people you can easily disprove that as any kind of rule.
Some of my extended family are Africans with large foreheads. And I don't have nearly as prominent a forehead as they do yet I excelled in school above 98% of my peers in a white country. And I'm not all African, but I've seen African immigrants at my school, pure sub-Saharan supposed "subhuman" people at the top of their college class majoring in a difficult subject. One was valedictorian. It completely exposes the nazi narrative as delusional.
And if you want to talk about genetics you need to talk about epigenetics, but most of these neo-nazis aren't sharp enough to know about that.
You present anecdotal evidence and exceptions to the rule but that doesn't prove much.
Statistically it's been established that sub-Saharan people (but also Hindus, Indians and Arabs) have a lower IQ than white people. The regime literally cancelled biology Nobel laureate James Watson for racism because of his findings.
Can you tell just by looking at the forehead? I think it's more about those races having a specific phenotype but the causal factor here is race (the whole), and not characteristics (the parts). So while characteristics like small forehead can still have predictive quality, it's a parts-whole fallacy and it's not the small forehead in particular that causes lower IQ.
It's hilarious watching darwinists atheists squirm about racism when the whole point of Darwin's work and of evo theory's natural selection was to demonstrate the fittest species and races get to the top.
In fact the outliers do disprove the nazi narrative. Nazis love to push the idea of sub-Saharan Africans being "subhuman" due to "bad genetics", but if their people can in just a generation or two of good habits achieve peak academic performance in white countries, the narrative falls apart.
Now you're arguing "it's been established that sub-Saharan people...have a low IQ than white people" on average, which is not something I ever argued against.
That's where you're oversimplifying things. This assumes once upon a time God created the "white genome" and then created the "black genome" and "indian genome" with their characteristics locked in place forever. That's not how things work.
As I said there is a phenomenon of epigenetics. As humans we all have this amazing human biology given to us by God which can be improved or damaged through our actions. We are highly adaptable creatures. And those outliers I mentioned proves my point completely and disproves the Nazi narrative completely.
These Africans didn't need to "evolve" through hundreds of thousands of years of "natural selection" in Europe to reach those levels of intellectual achievement.
I would say, it's also hilarious some professing Christians end up supporting Darwinian evolution. The sword cuts both ways.
Dude, I already told you the claim is not made by nazis alone but by renowned biologists and Nobel laureates. In fact I don't care what nazi think because they're delusional. They're not subhuman but races are different. One such difference is general lower IQ which is not just explained by environment but is also genetic.
This idea that we're all created equal and our circumstances are the only thing that matters is exactly why deranged leftists think it's ok to deluge the civilized countries with third world immigrants because eventually they will assimilate and integrate. No, the majority of them won't. There's a good reason why their countries are shitholes and have been so for thousands of years. They are incapable of building and living in a civilized society, just like in the OT the neighboring kingdoms of Israel were incapable of not being degenerate, killing their offspring and worshiping idols.
Since you're a Christian you should have no problems with agreeing that there's ontological difference between the races - the descendants of Ham (black people) were cursed to be subservient to the descendants of Shem (semites) and Japheth (whites, asians). This is the Biblical narrative and it's still considered racist, even though it has nothing to do with darwinism which was adopted by the nazis.
I'm a Christian and I don't think anyone evolved anywhere.
No, God created only Adam and Eve as perfect beings and all human genes stem from them. The races were formed long after the fall and after the flood.
Genetics are bullshit.
Josephine, it's too early to be posting drugged out crap like this.
Post ears, Schlomo.
Tits or GTFO, stormfaggot.
After all, your ideology is majority female and has been since the 30s, and even the latest major dox of white nationalist communities revealed women at the top.
Feminism is jewish faggotvitz.
Only election you won was with a majority female demographic, please cope harder.
The only argument you won by changing the subject was... Wait a second! You've never won an argument LOL
When did you ever win one? 😂
I'm not an inbredberg fuckwitvitz so I was born winning LOL
Remember when you argued you should be a mod of MGTOW? How'd that work out for you? 🤣