Twisted eara correlate to high rate of loxism
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (30)
sorted by:
I'm implying skull shape obsession is pseudo-scientific nonsense.
You can look around in real life and see if people's skulls match these Nazi cartoons. They don't.
Throughout all history people have acknowledged that physical appearance does tell a lot about the character of people. There's a lot of bs sure, but waving it all away by calling it a nazi idea and pseudoscience is equally dumb as going by it a 100%.
You're shifting goalposts to a much more general statement.
This fake science I've seen in nazi propaganda such as "black person == small forehead == no brain" is absurd. If you only know a handful of black people you can easily disprove that as any kind of rule.
Some of my extended family are Africans with large foreheads. And I don't have nearly as prominent a forehead as they do yet I excelled in school above 98% of my peers in a white country. And I'm not all African, but I've seen African immigrants at my school, pure sub-Saharan supposed "subhuman" people at the top of their college class majoring in a difficult subject. One was valedictorian. It completely exposes the nazi narrative as delusional.
And if you want to talk about genetics you need to talk about epigenetics, but most of these neo-nazis aren't sharp enough to know about that.
You present anecdotal evidence and exceptions to the rule but that doesn't prove much.
Statistically it's been established that sub-Saharan people (but also Hindus, Indians and Arabs) have a lower IQ than white people. The regime literally cancelled biology Nobel laureate James Watson for racism because of his findings.
Can you tell just by looking at the forehead? I think it's more about those races having a specific phenotype but the causal factor here is race (the whole), and not characteristics (the parts). So while characteristics like small forehead can still have predictive quality, it's a parts-whole fallacy and it's not the small forehead in particular that causes lower IQ.
It's hilarious watching darwinists atheists squirm about racism when the whole point of Darwin's work and of evo theory's natural selection was to demonstrate the fittest species and races get to the top.
In fact the outliers do disprove the nazi narrative. Nazis love to push the idea of sub-Saharan Africans being "subhuman" due to "bad genetics", but if their people can in just a generation or two of good habits achieve peak academic performance in white countries, the narrative falls apart.
Now you're arguing "it's been established that sub-Saharan people...have a low IQ than white people" on average, which is not something I ever argued against.
That's where you're oversimplifying things. This assumes once upon a time God created the "white genome" and then created the "black genome" and "indian genome" with their characteristics locked in place forever. That's not how things work.
As I said there is a phenomenon of epigenetics. As humans we all have this amazing human biology given to us by God which can be improved or damaged through our actions. We are highly adaptable creatures. And those outliers I mentioned proves my point completely and disproves the Nazi narrative completely.
These Africans didn't need to "evolve" through hundreds of thousands of years of "natural selection" in Europe to reach those levels of intellectual achievement.
I would say, it's also hilarious some professing Christians end up supporting Darwinian evolution. The sword cuts both ways.