"So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God." ~Romans 10:17
God naturalizes instruments within sound...the articulation of words destroys that, while permitting few to civilize aka domesticate many by speaking in the name of God.
a) There's no "or" to reality...fiction simply implies ones ignorance of reality.
b) Ones response (re) to all (al) implies instrument responding to natural sound.
No.
Putting a point behind nothing to indicate an end...that's very destructive to a being within everything moving.
Civilize what?
Anyone within civilization aka each ones consent given to a collective consensus.
Your dogs?
If a dog hears and chooses to follow ones command, then that's domestication by faith. The difference...a domesticated dog hearing "wait" gets exited to get relieved from his faith by "go"; while domesticated men exhaust one another by holding onto faith.
The dog knows that everything moves, yet submits to his master temporarily for benefits. The man denies knowledge by holding onto, while allowing to be domesticated into a deficit, hence the continued fall of civilization cycle.
Your word games? What?
What implies an abstract (suggestion) tempting one to ignore actual (perception). Implication solves that issue...if God, then what else?
Asking another "what" implies taking a chance, while ignoring given choice...that's a gamble/game.
I agree with that. He was a Roman citizen and tasked by the Sanhedrin with the destruction of the early movement. But, are you sure Paul aka Saul of Taurus real name was Philo? I know of a Philo who was a jewish philosopher from Alexandria, Egypt.
Personally I doubt St. Paul ever existed. It was just something they made up. He isn't mentioned by any ancient Roman historian, just as Titus Flavius Josephus (real name Joseph ben Matityahu), Pliny, Suetonius or Tacitus.
I don't deny this, someone had to create us. And we didn't come from monkeys. Darwin believed that the fossil record is incomplete due to the lack of discovery of intermediate forms, which he considered necessary for his theory of evolution. He maintained that if evolution were true, countless intermediary fossils demonstrating gradual transitions between species should be found. We found NONE.
And Jesus did exist, historians are reasonably confident of that. Two billion people believe Jesus is God, not a prophet, not a teacher, but literally God in human form. However, the Jesus that billions worship today is not the Jesus who actually lived and taught in 1st century Palestine. But he never claimed to be God. Today's Jesus is a religious icon that only proves the power of the empire. How the Elites can manipulate the narrative in order to brainwash people. And the made up character of Paul/Saul of Taurus is just another proof of that.
Philo is the real name of "Saint Paul".
The Jew who destroyed civilization by words alone.
Why do you believe Paul destroyed anything? Oh right, you don't know, you just want to be an athiest and never defend your beliefs.
"So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God." ~Romans 10:17
God naturalizes instruments within sound...the articulation of words destroys that, while permitting few to civilize aka domesticate many by speaking in the name of God.
In real life or in your word games?
No.
Civilize what? Your dogs? Your word games? What?
a) There's no "or" to reality...fiction simply implies ones ignorance of reality.
b) Ones response (re) to all (al) implies instrument responding to natural sound.
Putting a point behind nothing to indicate an end...that's very destructive to a being within everything moving.
Anyone within civilization aka each ones consent given to a collective consensus.
If a dog hears and chooses to follow ones command, then that's domestication by faith. The difference...a domesticated dog hearing "wait" gets exited to get relieved from his faith by "go"; while domesticated men exhaust one another by holding onto faith.
The dog knows that everything moves, yet submits to his master temporarily for benefits. The man denies knowledge by holding onto, while allowing to be domesticated into a deficit, hence the continued fall of civilization cycle.
What implies an abstract (suggestion) tempting one to ignore actual (perception). Implication solves that issue...if God, then what else?
Asking another "what" implies taking a chance, while ignoring given choice...that's a gamble/game.
I agree with that. He was a Roman citizen and tasked by the Sanhedrin with the destruction of the early movement. But, are you sure Paul aka Saul of Taurus real name was Philo? I know of a Philo who was a jewish philosopher from Alexandria, Egypt.
Personally I doubt St. Paul ever existed. It was just something they made up. He isn't mentioned by any ancient Roman historian, just as Titus Flavius Josephus (real name Joseph ben Matityahu), Pliny, Suetonius or Tacitus.
But God exists and we have all sorts of evidence from many avenues to defend the fact He exists.
I don't deny this, someone had to create us. And we didn't come from monkeys. Darwin believed that the fossil record is incomplete due to the lack of discovery of intermediate forms, which he considered necessary for his theory of evolution. He maintained that if evolution were true, countless intermediary fossils demonstrating gradual transitions between species should be found. We found NONE.
And Jesus did exist, historians are reasonably confident of that. Two billion people believe Jesus is God, not a prophet, not a teacher, but literally God in human form. However, the Jesus that billions worship today is not the Jesus who actually lived and taught in 1st century Palestine. But he never claimed to be God. Today's Jesus is a religious icon that only proves the power of the empire. How the Elites can manipulate the narrative in order to brainwash people. And the made up character of Paul/Saul of Taurus is just another proof of that.
Saint Paul doesn't exist. He is an OC self insert made by Philo.
Note that Philo is active around the same time as Paul.
Hey. Debunk my ideas.
Thanks. We're on the same page here.
By his logic a lot of historical figures don't exist. Example, we'd have to deny Napoleon.