Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

5
Paul Singer, the billionaire Jew who is set to make more money than anyone from this Venezuela crisis, who is also one of the main donors of Trump, and the main funder of tranny transitions for children, is also the main one who funds the "Christian Zionist" Philos Project. Proof in this video! (youtu.be)
posted 5 days ago by CrusaderPepe 5 days ago by CrusaderPepe +8 / -3
23 comments share
23 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (23)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– iloveturtles 2 points 4 days ago +2 / -0

Singer, who financed the never Trump movement is the CEO of hedge fund Elliott Management and Amber Energy. which bought Citgo Petroleum Corp from Venezuela creditors for way below market value.

The winning bid from the Elliott Management affiliate came in at $5.89 billion, lower than the $7 billion bid from another firm called "Gold Reserve Ltd", but a federal judge in Delaware viewed Elliott’s bid as most likely to close, as it included payments to Venezuela’s creditors.

PS singer did flip to support Trump and contributed to his inauguration fund.

permalink save report block reply
▲ -2 ▼
– Mrexreturns -2 points 5 days ago +1 / -3

Philo is the real name of "Saint Paul".

The Jew who destroyed civilization by words alone.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– guywholikesDjtof2024 1 point 5 days ago +2 / -1

Why do you believe Paul destroyed anything? Oh right, you don't know, you just want to be an athiest and never defend your beliefs.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 5 days ago +2 / -1

Why do you believe Paul destroyed anything?

"So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God." ~Romans 10:17

God naturalizes instruments within sound...the articulation of words destroys that, while permitting few to civilize aka domesticate many by speaking in the name of God.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points 5 days ago +3 / -1

naturallizes instruments

In real life or in your word games?

destroys that

No.

few to civilize

Civilize what? Your dogs? Your word games? What?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 5 days ago +2 / -1

In real life or...

a) There's no "or" to reality...fiction simply implies ones ignorance of reality.

b) Ones response (re) to all (al) implies instrument responding to natural sound.

No.

Putting a point behind nothing to indicate an end...that's very destructive to a being within everything moving.

Civilize what?

Anyone within civilization aka each ones consent given to a collective consensus.

Your dogs?

If a dog hears and chooses to follow ones command, then that's domestication by faith. The difference...a domesticated dog hearing "wait" gets exited to get relieved from his faith by "go"; while domesticated men exhaust one another by holding onto faith.

The dog knows that everything moves, yet submits to his master temporarily for benefits. The man denies knowledge by holding onto, while allowing to be domesticated into a deficit, hence the continued fall of civilization cycle.

Your word games? What?

What implies an abstract (suggestion) tempting one to ignore actual (perception). Implication solves that issue...if God, then what else?

Asking another "what" implies taking a chance, while ignoring given choice...that's a gamble/game.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– guywholikesDjtof2024 0 points 5 days ago +2 / -2

Putting a point behind nothing to indicate an end...that's very destructive to a being within everything moving.

No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No.

Now I have SUPER-DESTROYED you and your empty word games! Now you can no longer analyze words. Now you'll talk normally.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 4 days ago +2 / -1

No. No. No...

Notice that de-struc-tion implies a division of structure within action. You tried to add structure within everything by multiplying nothing. You structure doesn't have a foundation...

Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Destinys-child-no-no-no-part-1-lyrics

your empty word

Do you think that adding "nothing" to emptiness fills it up?

Now you can no longer analyze words.

Now implies in-between before and after aka as choice within balance. See...using free will of choice to analyze "now" allows one to discern self, which one ignores when trying to curtail others into "no longer" using free will of choice.

Now you'll talk normally

Here's the NORM... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UV8cI1U43II aka a running joke to domesticate an audience to follow the norm.

And let's also mention norm/gnōmōn - "carpenter's square"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/norm aka the tool used by masons to mark angles/angels...fallen angels.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– guywholikesDjtof2024 1 point 4 days ago +2 / -1

Wrong. The word "No" is already a structure. Thanks for admitting everything you said was false.

no longer using free will of choice

Ohhhh, so you believe you'll become a puppet if you talk like an actual person. Too late, you've already wrote normally before in the past. Also, that's wrong. I have free will, so how do you explain that?

"YOU HAVE TO DO MY SPECIFIC ACTIONS OR ELSE YOURE A PUPPET!!!!" Yeah right. How very convenient.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 1 ▼
– jamesbillison 1 point 5 days ago +1 / -0

The Jew who destroyed civilization

I agree with that. He was a Roman citizen and tasked by the Sanhedrin with the destruction of the early movement. But, are you sure Paul aka Saul of Taurus real name was Philo? I know of a Philo who was a jewish philosopher from Alexandria, Egypt.

Personally I doubt St. Paul ever existed. It was just something they made up. He isn't mentioned by any ancient Roman historian, just as Titus Flavius Josephus (real name Joseph ben Matityahu), Pliny, Suetonius or Tacitus.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points 4 days ago +2 / -0

But God exists and we have all sorts of evidence from many avenues to defend the fact He exists.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– jamesbillison 2 points 4 days ago +2 / -0

But God exists

I don't deny this, someone had to create us. And we didn't come from monkeys. Darwin believed that the fossil record is incomplete due to the lack of discovery of intermediate forms, which he considered necessary for his theory of evolution. He maintained that if evolution were true, countless intermediary fossils demonstrating gradual transitions between species should be found. We found NONE.

And Jesus did exist, historians are reasonably confident of that. Two billion people believe Jesus is God, not a prophet, not a teacher, but literally God in human form. However, the Jesus that billions worship today is not the Jesus who actually lived and taught in 1st century Palestine. But he never claimed to be God. Today's Jesus is a religious icon that only proves the power of the empire. How the Elites can manipulate the narrative in order to brainwash people. And the made up character of Paul/Saul of Taurus is just another proof of that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– Mrexreturns -1 points 5 days ago +1 / -2

Saint Paul doesn't exist. He is an OC self insert made by Philo.

Note that Philo is active around the same time as Paul.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points 4 days ago +2 / -0

Hey. Debunk my ideas.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– jamesbillison 2 points 5 days ago +2 / -0

Thanks. We're on the same page here.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points 4 days ago +2 / -0

By his logic a lot of historical figures don't exist. Example, we'd have to deny Napoleon.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– jamesbillison 3 points 4 days ago +3 / -0

By his logic a lot of historical figures don't exist

And you're correct here. History is not something we can observe. That's why historical science deals with past events that were not directly observed, and observational science is true science and can be trusted, whereas historical science is, at best, weak and highly unreliable.

Historians use observation and analysis of historical data to make logical conclusions based on the clues left behind by past events. They also use comparison with realistic experiences and they use repeatable uncontrolled experiments. Historiography is the study of historical writing. It involves critically examining sources, selecting specific details from authentic materials, and synthesizing them into a narrative that withstands critical analysis.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nxltw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy