Great challenge! The sarcastic answer is simple, Bill: CDC changed the definitions, as did many scientists and lexicographers, so now "virus" means "one of an artificial computer-generated set of sequences after trillions of PCR amplifications". Look on their computer, see a virus. The goal is to declare everyone sick so they can control everyone. The Bible says everyone is already sick and Jesus is the answer, and he's a better king than anybody, so I'm sticking with his prognosis.
Here is a photo, and info, about Ebola. a virus. Not that you will believe it or be convinced. The ant-science movement in this, the most scientifically advanced time in human history, scares the bejesus out of me.
The point of u/ImBillCurtis is that SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated, purified, and published. I don't think he's speaking about all viruses, because every other coronavirus is either so common as to be harmless to healthy people, or so deadly as to be untransmissible to healthy people. The attempt to paint SARS-CoV-2 as both common and deadly was the psyop.
I’m saying no virus has ever been isolated.
No isolation procedure has ever been performed on a “virus”, which until the beginning of the 20th century meant “poisonous fluid” and not “an infectious particle transmissible from animal to animal.
If they weee real with an identifiable molecular weight, then any freshman biology student could centrifuge a sample, isolate the band it’s in, put it under a microscope, observe it. Then take that isolated band, inject it into another host, observe the SAME disease state occur, and perform the same isolation procedures I listed above.
Your ridiculous statements are pseudo-intellectual nonsense. Most of what you say in your statement is ignorant and untrue. I could take you into a lab, show you the procedure, which I have done, (it is not quite as simple as you propose, but it is kinda close), infect a lab animal and watch it die, but you still would not believe it because of your anti-science bent. You would rather believe "poisonous fluid" (blood in the case of hemorrhagic fevers, laden with virus) from a time when barbers did simple surgery and autopsies with the same instruments, often infecting the healthy because of the poor hygienic conditions.
We also went from the first powered flight in 1903 to landing on the moon in 1969. but you probably think the moon landing was a "psyop" or that the earth is flat and we can't get through the "firmament"
All influenza viruses are deadly. There is no "psyop". Overused term used to dismiss any and all things you want to see as a conspiracy.of some sort, even when all evidence points to nothing.of the sort.
Since I misread Bill, I'm going to watch the debate with gusto, but I go with Moses on it: he said cover the lower half of your face only if you're sick, not if you're asymptomatic, so there must be a difference between common but benign to the healthy, and deadly but intransmissible to the healthy.
Then show me a virus, as defined by the CDC. Isolated, purified, proven to be infectious. Thank you.
Great challenge! The sarcastic answer is simple, Bill: CDC changed the definitions, as did many scientists and lexicographers, so now "virus" means "one of an artificial computer-generated set of sequences after trillions of PCR amplifications". Look on their computer, see a virus. The goal is to declare everyone sick so they can control everyone. The Bible says everyone is already sick and Jesus is the answer, and he's a better king than anybody, so I'm sticking with his prognosis.
Here is a photo, and info, about Ebola. a virus. Not that you will believe it or be convinced. The ant-science movement in this, the most scientifically advanced time in human history, scares the bejesus out of me.
https://www.cdc.gov/ebola/about/index.html
A cool. An unsourced photograph with zero isolation procedures listed.
Try again.
Nothing will convince you, you are too entrenched in your non-believer dogma. Here is something else you won't read or try to understand...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9126445/
Still no proof, huh?
Next time try reading your random, lazy ass, pubmed queries before posting stupid fucking maps of “outbreaks”.
The point of u/ImBillCurtis is that SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated, purified, and published. I don't think he's speaking about all viruses, because every other coronavirus is either so common as to be harmless to healthy people, or so deadly as to be untransmissible to healthy people. The attempt to paint SARS-CoV-2 as both common and deadly was the psyop.
Incorrect.
I’m saying no virus has ever been isolated. No isolation procedure has ever been performed on a “virus”, which until the beginning of the 20th century meant “poisonous fluid” and not “an infectious particle transmissible from animal to animal.
If they weee real with an identifiable molecular weight, then any freshman biology student could centrifuge a sample, isolate the band it’s in, put it under a microscope, observe it. Then take that isolated band, inject it into another host, observe the SAME disease state occur, and perform the same isolation procedures I listed above.
That has never been done on any virus ever.
Your ridiculous statements are pseudo-intellectual nonsense. Most of what you say in your statement is ignorant and untrue. I could take you into a lab, show you the procedure, which I have done, (it is not quite as simple as you propose, but it is kinda close), infect a lab animal and watch it die, but you still would not believe it because of your anti-science bent. You would rather believe "poisonous fluid" (blood in the case of hemorrhagic fevers, laden with virus) from a time when barbers did simple surgery and autopsies with the same instruments, often infecting the healthy because of the poor hygienic conditions.
We also went from the first powered flight in 1903 to landing on the moon in 1969. but you probably think the moon landing was a "psyop" or that the earth is flat and we can't get through the "firmament"
You are anti-science and pro-ignorance.
QED
All influenza viruses are deadly. There is no "psyop". Overused term used to dismiss any and all things you want to see as a conspiracy.of some sort, even when all evidence points to nothing.of the sort.
Since I misread Bill, I'm going to watch the debate with gusto, but I go with Moses on it: he said cover the lower half of your face only if you're sick, not if you're asymptomatic, so there must be a difference between common but benign to the healthy, and deadly but intransmissible to the healthy.