That's a funny way of spelling Christian influence.
Digital ID wasn't even considered before you retards started crying that little Timmy might see tits. Parent your own kids, you whiny cunts. Why are parents such an absolute entitled plague?
Project 2025 is not a group, it's a report by a group called the Heritage Foundation. While the Heritage Foundation has some Christian members, they also have their fair share of atheist billionaires and Zionist shills.
I couldn't find anything linking Project 2025 to digital ID. What are you referring to?
The only place in the US that is actually trialing digital ID is California, the atheist hellscape.
You're being obtuse. Project 2025's authors can be referred to as a group and are overwhelmingly Christcucks. Your "umm acksually" answer is just an effort to deflect this.
...App Store Accountability Act? Again, I really can't tell if you're playing dumb or you genuinely don't know.
This is blatantly false. You can't even use the Internet in Texas without Digital ID.
Why can't you get your facts straight? You're always almost right, with some seemingly correct information interspersed with nonsense and outright lies. Maybe it you were technically accurate (in your attempt to get humanity to commit suicide) I wouldn't have to "um, actually" you. Be better.
I went and reviewed the Heritage Foundation board of directors (which you didn't link) and the majority are atheists. Most of the remaining Christians are explicit Zionists (ie Jews with extra steps). Where are the Christians?
On that topic, the author of the bill you mentioned, Mike Lee, is a trustee of the HF, but didn't join until after the publication of Project 2025; another reason accuracy matters. Also, for no particular reason: https://www.trackaipac.com/states/utah?rq=Mike%20Lee
As for Project 2025, this is just a nickname for a report that's published every year since the 80s. The current regime has already explicitely rejected several of their proposals, including some around immigration, so it's not as though they're running the show. Further, while the report does call for criminalize pornography, it says nothing about digital ID, which makes sense as DID is a method of legitimizing pronography by creating mechanisms of exclusive access to it. Why would any anti-porn group want a way to make porn accessible to anyone?
After having done your research, I think it's not very likely that Mike Lee was paid almost $400,000 by Jews and then decided afterwards to join the Heritage Foundation (an avowed pro-America group) in order to express his "Christian beliefs" by finding ways for adults to access porn. I think it much more likely that a bought-and-paid-for Zionist intentionally infiltrated a pro-America group in order to obfuscate the source of his bill which clearly aligns with Jewish interests (ie using porn to blackmail specific individuals).
We moved past the porn issue a long fucking time ago. This strawman has been beaten harder than Mia Khalifa's asshole.
Why has Digital ID propagated so quickly past the "original target"? Because it was never really about porn, it was about instituting a system of control that will let the natalists reduce the quality of life of those without kids.
DEI agenda is not Atheist, it is Abrahamic disguised as atheist to discredit atheists (non-believers and seculars) as degenerate scum so they can all be exterminated for the pettiest of reasons imaginable.
Real ones shout outside.
They did to the internet what they do to nations: Destroy homogeneity by importing everything possible under the guise of divershitty.
Anyone who has been online for over 20 years sees the night and day difference between how people interact with one another.
That's a funny way of spelling Christian influence.
Digital ID wasn't even considered before you retards started crying that little Timmy might see tits. Parent your own kids, you whiny cunts. Why are parents such an absolute entitled plague?
I did the courtesy of countering your downvote. Isn't White Unity great? 😁
Go to bed, it's like 6am in South Africa.
Name me a single parent calling for this (other than professional politicians).
https://about.fb.com/news/2025/11/canadian-parents-support-app-store-age-verification-for-teens-when-downloading-apps/
https://medium.com/@AntigoneDavis/parenting-in-a-digital-world-is-hard-congress-can-make-it-easier-6039e7a350b1
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/10/31/81-of-us-adults-versus-46-of-teens-favor-parental-consent-for-minors-to-use-social-media/
Funny way to spell Christians.
EU Chat Control, supported by Christian Hungary.
Digital ID in US, supported by Project 2025, an explicitly Christian group.
Project 2025 is not a group, it's a report by a group called the Heritage Foundation. While the Heritage Foundation has some Christian members, they also have their fair share of atheist billionaires and Zionist shills.
I couldn't find anything linking Project 2025 to digital ID. What are you referring to?
The only place in the US that is actually trialing digital ID is California, the atheist hellscape.
You're being obtuse. Project 2025's authors can be referred to as a group and are overwhelmingly Christcucks. Your "umm acksually" answer is just an effort to deflect this.
...App Store Accountability Act? Again, I really can't tell if you're playing dumb or you genuinely don't know.
This is blatantly false. You can't even use the Internet in Texas without Digital ID.
coug
https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/1586/text
You can't tie it in.
Also, there is no digital ID program in Texas. While the law says there should be, they never actually implemented it.
Do some research before posting next time, this took me all of 30 minutes.
Why can't you get your facts straight? You're always almost right, with some seemingly correct information interspersed with nonsense and outright lies. Maybe it you were technically accurate (in your attempt to get humanity to commit suicide) I wouldn't have to "um, actually" you. Be better.
I went and reviewed the Heritage Foundation board of directors (which you didn't link) and the majority are atheists. Most of the remaining Christians are explicit Zionists (ie Jews with extra steps). Where are the Christians?
On that topic, the author of the bill you mentioned, Mike Lee, is a trustee of the HF, but didn't join until after the publication of Project 2025; another reason accuracy matters. Also, for no particular reason: https://www.trackaipac.com/states/utah?rq=Mike%20Lee
As for Project 2025, this is just a nickname for a report that's published every year since the 80s. The current regime has already explicitely rejected several of their proposals, including some around immigration, so it's not as though they're running the show. Further, while the report does call for criminalize pornography, it says nothing about digital ID, which makes sense as DID is a method of legitimizing pronography by creating mechanisms of exclusive access to it. Why would any anti-porn group want a way to make porn accessible to anyone?
After having done your research, I think it's not very likely that Mike Lee was paid almost $400,000 by Jews and then decided afterwards to join the Heritage Foundation (an avowed pro-America group) in order to express his "Christian beliefs" by finding ways for adults to access porn. I think it much more likely that a bought-and-paid-for Zionist intentionally infiltrated a pro-America group in order to obfuscate the source of his bill which clearly aligns with Jewish interests (ie using porn to blackmail specific individuals).
That's why details matter.
We moved past the porn issue a long fucking time ago. This strawman has been beaten harder than Mia Khalifa's asshole.
Why has Digital ID propagated so quickly past the "original target"? Because it was never really about porn, it was about instituting a system of control that will let the natalists reduce the quality of life of those without kids.
Christians are human garbage.
Nobody cares. It's not relevant.
DEI agenda is not Atheist, it is Abrahamic disguised as atheist to discredit atheists (non-believers and seculars) as degenerate scum so they can all be exterminated for the pettiest of reasons imaginable.
That's funny, why are so many of it's proponents avout atheists (including atheist Jews)?
Which Christians support DEI?
Christians do not support DEI, but DEI is an Abrahamic religion because all it does is the exact same thing:
Tolerate death and destruction, we are very tolerant and forgiving, but the smallest slight against us and you will roll over and die.
According to the Bible, "he who shall not work shall not eat". (paraphrase)
EBT and SNAP welfare babies and the whole concept of DEI blown out!!!!
DEI is neither immoral nor moral in Athiest Land, you can make up whatever morals you want with zero eternal repercussions.
lol
I'm stating facts, Christcuck.
Feel free to check them.
You haven’t, jewish woman.
Thanks for admitting I have stated facts and you are reduced to non-sequiturs befitting your low intellect.
You stole that line from your adversary.
You mean like you retards stole every argument you have from us and just made it incorrect to match your stupid ideas?
The jew cries out in pain as it strikes you.
Us...
You haven’t, jewish woman.
Christianity is Judaism for the gentiles.
The decline of society will be here to stay and will manifest itself as different forms as long as people are not 95% snapped from the god delusion.
lol