Like how christen (to anoint) implies separation, which amassing contradicts?
in which certain truths are exoteric and others esoteric
Being within nature implies eso (internal) within exo (external)...others suggest "certain truth" to tempt one to hold onto, while ignoring that exo separates eso internally during a process which cannot be held onto.
the masses receiving exoteric doctrine
Joining a mass implies going into it aka from external towards internal. Consenting to a suggested doctrine implies internal consent inviting external doctrine in.
reincarnation
Aka being reaction (re) within (in) the flesh (carna) of action (tion) aka nature acts; each being reacts in the flesh.
pre-existent soul
Soul/sole implies "one and only". Existence implies each ones expressing (ex) stance (stence) within (i) the one and only.
Cause implies oneness; effect implies each one within. Cause (nature) implies the soul of each essential effect (being).
secret
Aka secret/seco - "to divide" aka the division of all (god) into each one (christ) aka divinity.
too carnal in their manner of thinking to handle it.
Manual aka manus (hand) + al (all)...that's how all gives each one a hand to handle. Others suggests mannerism to distract from that.
Exoteric teachings are face-value ones that are external to a person
Person aka per (by) son/sonos (sound) implies each internal (eso) instrument within all external (exo) sound.
Esoteric teachings are deeper meaning ones that apply internally
It doesn't matter how deep one inhales...nature forces each being to exhale. Why? Because being within nature implies as a temporal potential during an ongoing process. Others suggest "meaning" to tempt potential to ignore procession by taking into possession aka by artificially applying (joining; combining) what nature sets apart.
Nature implies the moving process which allows each potential being within to learn to teach self by teaching self how to learn aka as above/so below. Others suggest one to submit as student to teacher aka as follower to leader aka as many to few aka as ones choice to a chosen one aka as slave to master...
a different and deeper story
God implies all giving...story (to store) implies taking into possession, while ignoring all giving procession. Differentiation implies equal procession (inception towards death) generating different potential (life) by internal separation from one another.
the places, names, numbers
a) Name/nombre/number - "designation of a unit", from unitas/unus - "one" aka the oneness of God for each unit of being within.
b) Position implies potential (posit) within action (ion) aka each ones place-ment (mind placed) within all.
Each of our Souls
Each implies one apart from one another, hence soul/sole - "one and only" implying the singularity of God...others suggest pluralism (souls) to tempt ones singular consent into a consensus (our) with one another.
There can be only one aka one for all and all for one aka alone...all(in)one.
created at the beginning of Creation
a) Begin implies being (be) generation (gin)...only within generation (inception towards death) can one come into being (life).
b) Being (life) implies in-between beginning (inception) and end (death)...God (motion) generates beginning/end (momentum) for being (matter). Only within God can there be a begging and end of being.
c) All was before one can come into being...coming into being within all implies a transformation aka the transfer of form (life) within flowing action (inception towards death).
Others suggest creationism aka creatio ex nihilo... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo aka "The Tree of Life, or Etz haChayim (עץ החיים) in Hebrew, is a mystical symbol used in the Kabbalah of esoteric Judaism to describe the path to HaShem and the manner in which he created the world ex nihilo (out of nothing)."
Creation (out of nothing) represents the inversion of transformation (within everything). Furthermore...nothing implies suggested nihilo-ism tempting ones de-nial of perceivable for suggested.
The origin of nothing implies ones denial of everything. Creationism tempts denialism...a simple trick to distract from self discernment.
God cannot create...God was all that can be, which internally transforms into each being. That's how origin (inception) and outcome (death) imply the same God for each Christ (anointed one) within.
We are like
One implies differentiated from one another. Others suggest "we" aka pluralism aka nosism... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_we to invert analysis with synthesis by alchemy.
a neuron in the Mind of our Soul, whereas our Soul is like a neuron in the Mind of God
a) God (motion) > mind (momentum) > body (matter)...a sole/soul process animating spiritual essence by division/divination/differentiation.
b) Neuron/neuro - "tendon, sinew" aka being drawn by strings, while ignoring that God sets each being free (will of choice).
Notice neu/new (there's nothing new under the sun) + tend (turn the mind aka circular logic) + sin/syn (together; jointly)...these are all tricks to invert the natural with artificial.
A person's
There's not "a" person; only one SON (sonos; sanus; sound; whole; entire; all) for each PER (by) within. Being an in-stru-ment (mind structured within) implies being a by-product of sound aka a per-son.
Others utilize spell-craft like "insane person" to distract one from discerning self as in sanus (within sound) per sonos (by sound). Consenting to the DEFINITION of words makes one a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound).
our Souls, The One is God
If God implies one, then "our souls" contradicts God...possession of plural contradicts given singularity.
what is a level above
Level implies being in-between above/below aka odd choice within even balance, hence level/libella/libra - "balance".
Level aka levare (to raise) el (god).
To the animals
Animal implies all (al) animating (anim) each one within. Branding matter as motion (animal) tempts one to ignore that motion animates (inception towards death) matter (life).
Being implies re-anima-tion aka reacting to being animated by action, also implying re-in-carna-tion.
God emanated throughout its Creation on various levels, where it gains...
a) God cannot gain, which would imply more than God. Only within God can there be ongoing loss (inception towards death) for each temporary growth (life).
b) Emanate implies "flowing out". Only within God can animation flow in (inception) and out (death) of each formed being (life).
Jesus said to his disciples, "Compare me to something and tell me what I am like."
Simon Peter said to him, "You are like a just messenger."
Matthew said to him, "You are like a wise philosopher."
Thomas said to him, "Teacher, my mouth is utterly unable to say what you are like."
Jesus said, "I am not your teacher. Because you have drunk, you have become intoxicated from the bubbling spring that I have tended."
And he took him, and withdrew, and spoke three sayings to him. When Thomas came back to his friends they asked him, "What did Jesus say to you?"
Thomas said to them, "If I tell you one of the sayings he spoke to me, you will pick up rocks and stone me, and fire will come from the rocks and devour you."
Good post :) it’s nice to see someone talking theology without making it about hitler’s views on the subject lmao
Compare me to something and tell me what I am like.
Any comparison drawn establishes artificial likeness among natural differences.
my mouth is utterly unable to say what you are like
Because uttering likeness by the mouth contradicts difference of the mouth. One can only utter outwards if ones mouth has a different position within all sound and from the mouth of one another.
If I tell you one of the sayings he spoke to me, you will pick up rocks and stone me, and fire will come from the rocks and devour you."
Tell/del - "to count"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/tell Counting makes one accountable to one another. That's why others lash out to whatever one articulates in speech. DON'T TELL...guess who uses that while distracting everyone else with tales?
You can't possibly be so ignorant as to be unable to look for yourself, considering all the reading you must have done to come up with all these totally original observations you've made that just can't be you quoting from IhateGod.com.
Like how christen (to anoint) implies separation, which amassing contradicts?
Being within nature implies eso (internal) within exo (external)...others suggest "certain truth" to tempt one to hold onto, while ignoring that exo separates eso internally during a process which cannot be held onto.
Joining a mass implies going into it aka from external towards internal. Consenting to a suggested doctrine implies internal consent inviting external doctrine in.
Aka being reaction (re) within (in) the flesh (carna) of action (tion) aka nature acts; each being reacts in the flesh.
Soul/sole implies "one and only". Existence implies each ones expressing (ex) stance (stence) within (i) the one and only.
Cause implies oneness; effect implies each one within. Cause (nature) implies the soul of each essential effect (being).
Aka secret/seco - "to divide" aka the division of all (god) into each one (christ) aka divinity.
Good analogy, yeah.
Manual aka manus (hand) + al (all)...that's how all gives each one a hand to handle. Others suggests mannerism to distract from that.
Person aka per (by) son/sonos (sound) implies each internal (eso) instrument within all external (exo) sound.
It doesn't matter how deep one inhales...nature forces each being to exhale. Why? Because being within nature implies as a temporal potential during an ongoing process. Others suggest "meaning" to tempt potential to ignore procession by taking into possession aka by artificially applying (joining; combining) what nature sets apart.
Nature implies the moving process which allows each potential being within to learn to teach self by teaching self how to learn aka as above/so below. Others suggest one to submit as student to teacher aka as follower to leader aka as many to few aka as ones choice to a chosen one aka as slave to master...
God implies all giving...story (to store) implies taking into possession, while ignoring all giving procession. Differentiation implies equal procession (inception towards death) generating different potential (life) by internal separation from one another.
a) Name/nombre/number - "designation of a unit", from unitas/unus - "one" aka the oneness of God for each unit of being within.
b) Position implies potential (posit) within action (ion) aka each ones place-ment (mind placed) within all.
Each implies one apart from one another, hence soul/sole - "one and only" implying the singularity of God...others suggest pluralism (souls) to tempt ones singular consent into a consensus (our) with one another.
There can be only one aka one for all and all for one aka alone...all(in)one.
a) Begin implies being (be) generation (gin)...only within generation (inception towards death) can one come into being (life).
b) Being (life) implies in-between beginning (inception) and end (death)...God (motion) generates beginning/end (momentum) for being (matter). Only within God can there be a begging and end of being.
c) All was before one can come into being...coming into being within all implies a transformation aka the transfer of form (life) within flowing action (inception towards death).
Others suggest creationism aka creatio ex nihilo... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo aka "The Tree of Life, or Etz haChayim (עץ החיים) in Hebrew, is a mystical symbol used in the Kabbalah of esoteric Judaism to describe the path to HaShem and the manner in which he created the world ex nihilo (out of nothing)."
Creation (out of nothing) represents the inversion of transformation (within everything). Furthermore...nothing implies suggested nihilo-ism tempting ones de-nial of perceivable for suggested.
The origin of nothing implies ones denial of everything. Creationism tempts denialism...a simple trick to distract from self discernment.
God cannot create...God was all that can be, which internally transforms into each being. That's how origin (inception) and outcome (death) imply the same God for each Christ (anointed one) within.
One implies differentiated from one another. Others suggest "we" aka pluralism aka nosism... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_we to invert analysis with synthesis by alchemy.
a) God (motion) > mind (momentum) > body (matter)...a sole/soul process animating spiritual essence by division/divination/differentiation.
b) Neuron/neuro - "tendon, sinew" aka being drawn by strings, while ignoring that God sets each being free (will of choice).
Notice neu/new (there's nothing new under the sun) + tend (turn the mind aka circular logic) + sin/syn (together; jointly)...these are all tricks to invert the natural with artificial.
There's not "a" person; only one SON (sonos; sanus; sound; whole; entire; all) for each PER (by) within. Being an in-stru-ment (mind structured within) implies being a by-product of sound aka a per-son.
Others utilize spell-craft like "insane person" to distract one from discerning self as in sanus (within sound) per sonos (by sound). Consenting to the DEFINITION of words makes one a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound).
If God implies one, then "our souls" contradicts God...possession of plural contradicts given singularity.
Level implies being in-between above/below aka odd choice within even balance, hence level/libella/libra - "balance".
Level aka levare (to raise) el (god).
Animal implies all (al) animating (anim) each one within. Branding matter as motion (animal) tempts one to ignore that motion animates (inception towards death) matter (life).
Being implies re-anima-tion aka reacting to being animated by action, also implying re-in-carna-tion.
a) God cannot gain, which would imply more than God. Only within God can there be ongoing loss (inception towards death) for each temporary growth (life).
b) Emanate implies "flowing out". Only within God can animation flow in (inception) and out (death) of each formed being (life).
Knowledge implies being (matter) at the edge (momentum) of known (motion) aka "livin on the edge"... https://genius.com/Aerosmith-livin-on-the-edge-lyrics
Good post :) it’s nice to see someone talking theology without making it about hitler’s views on the subject lmao
The Gospel of Thomas is one of the most important Gnostic texts in the Nag Hammadi Library. I immediately recognized it. https://bibliotecapleyades.net/nag_hammadi/gthlamb.htm
Any comparison drawn establishes artificial likeness among natural differences.
Because uttering likeness by the mouth contradicts difference of the mouth. One can only utter outwards if ones mouth has a different position within all sound and from the mouth of one another.
Tell/del - "to count"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/tell Counting makes one accountable to one another. That's why others lash out to whatever one articulates in speech. DON'T TELL...guess who uses that while distracting everyone else with tales?
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/No-doubt-dont-speak-lyrics
GIGO.
There are many others who were both more important and better.
Because you demand it and I bow down to worship you?
Fuck off.
No.
You can't possibly be so ignorant as to be unable to look for yourself, considering all the reading you must have done to come up with all these totally original observations you've made that just can't be you quoting from IhateGod.com.