Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

6
PART 2: SwampRangers is a group of parasites, who infiltrate forums to control them. This is a legit site - https://www.scottlively.net/swamp-rangers/ || I see you took out the Swamp Oath there, SwampRangers... You must be kicking yourself right now because I made a screenshot of it, huh? :D (media.conspiracies.win)
posted 9 days ago by Neo1 9 days ago by Neo1 +9 / -3
55 comments download share
55 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (55)
sorted by:
▲ -1 ▼
– SwampRangers -1 points 9 days ago +1 / -2

Yes, I am part of an organization. I don't have and am not part of "an organization that upvotes my posts and downvotes anyone disagreeing with me". That would be platform bannable and you're imagining things if you think otherwise.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Neo1 [S] 3 points 9 days ago +3 / -0

Prove it then.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– SwampRangers -1 points 9 days ago +1 / -2

Oh, I missed this one, written before you asked me to stop talking to you again. If you want proof that I and Swamp Rangers are not manipulating votes, you'll need to state what kind of proof you accept, because due to admin's high respect for privacy there is hardly any way anyone can offer proof of that assertion except via character based on public statement. So I don't know how I would "prove" it to you. You're free to drop the question (and join me in beginning a ceasefire) or to press it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Thisisnotanexit 2 points 9 days ago +2 / -0

u/Neo1 I've been upvoting SwampRangers sporadically and I've downvoted your posts.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Neo1 [S] 2 points 9 days ago +3 / -1

That's perfect.

I thought exposing shills would be hard on this forum, but you make it so easy.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 1 ▼
– Neo1 [S] 1 point 9 days ago +1 / -0

I thought you wanted to "talk yourself out of this", but I see no proof of your claims still.

Just a shadow organization that couldn't capture this forum...

How sad for you...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– SwampRangers -1 points 9 days ago +1 / -2

The organization isn't focused on capturing the forum, the Swamp Rangers exist to help Jesus Christ conquer the world. The forum will capitulate to Jesus in good time. You're either in favor of Jesus conquering the world, or you're getting conquered by Jesus, pretty simple.

I told you that to get proof you'd need to state terms of acceptable proof. However, it's pretty good prima facie evidence that the purposes of Swamp Rangers are consistent with those republished by Scott last year. We are after the Potomac Swamp, primarily. For you to twist that into concern about Conspiracies is pretty self-inserting. Ceasefire is still available.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - j6rsh (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy