11 Remember that when they say "protecting children on the internet now", they meant that you will be treated as a heretic over eggshell issues. One wrong perceived misdeed and you will DIE -- this is the future you earned (twitter.com) posted 89 days ago by Mrexreturns 89 days ago by Mrexreturns +12 / -1 14 comments share 14 comments share save hide report block hide replies
If it's truly about the kids then why not make tougher laws with automatic time served caught with this shit.
I just watched the supreme court of Canada vote against a minimum one year sentence for these pervs
"We need the people who are all being blackmailed for their child abuse, and literally protecting pedophiles from justice, to keep kids safe from dirty pictures online."
This is all I hear whenever anyone suggests we need nanny laws.
Typical, as old earth and evolution are based on guessing.
She's clearly arguing in bad faith. There's no reasoning with her; I only respond to get her to kvetch.
I also find it fun to rebut the DresdenStinkBomber. :p
Your opposition to DID is based on Christianity. Atheism never has and never had any inherent provisions against DID or censorship.
P2025 is a scare hoax and bogeyman.
lol
Luckily for you, nobody needs sterile troons to get married.
Why would I care?
lol