I think the case is pretty convincing that the Sphinx was constructed during the age of Leo, facing the direction of Leo. I think it’s reasonable to link the Sphinx construction date and the great Pyramid construction date, though to what extent is debatable. Suffice it to say that atleast part of the complex was constructed in alignment with the age of Leo.
(Other than the mismatch in significant digits), Those numbers all seem fine as a jumping off point. It should be noted that “onset of the younger dryas” at 12,900 and “end of Wisconsin ice age” (~11,700 years according to google) would be describing the two boundaries of one cataclysm, not two different ones 1,000 years apart. Which is to say that this should all be approached with the recognition that “fuzziness” in the numbers is inescapable, and thus to let that be the core of any objection is, imo, a disingenuous approach, so hopefully we don’t see that tact.
And one theory on this is that the precession might coincidentally correspond to a Planet Nine orbit that causes meteors at just these cusps for some reason relating to four biaxial Oort-like encounters?
That’s a theory, for sure. I think there are atleast a few others worth considering as well. Namely geomagnetic pole drifts/excursions/reversals, Milankovich (solar forcing) cycles, “cosmic environment” theories (along the lines of the ‘Electric Universe’ theory). Probably others im forgetting or have never come across.
While suspending my judgment for the purposes of the roundtable, how does the pyramid point to this whole cycle of cataclysms? What value would it have had in relation to any of these events, other than to be something that might survive global flood? And your big reason for backdating the sphinx is that the sphinx would then be looking at Leo at sunrise in spring only rather than in winter only? And you don't know what brought on the cataclysms on this list (as opposed to others) but it just neatly aligned with these precession eras as if some hand were guiding them to align?
How about this: A real conspiracy would be if geologists conspired to ensure that cataclysm dates would align roughly with precession dates such that they could be compiled into such a list later to prove the zodiac had power. That seems a lot easier than having spirits actually align all these events and actually cause all that damage for real. It also seems wiser not to ascribe too much to those spirits when we know they like to lie about numbers and correlations. Just spitballing.
how does the pyramid point to this whole cycle of cataclysms… other than to be something that might survive global flood?
Asked and answered, though oddly treated as if that isn’t a direct answer to the question… remember, the idea is that the site itself is built in recognition of the Precession (pointing to Leo in the Age of Leo) - its only “goal” or “purpose” at that point is to survive the next cataclysm.
And you don't know what brought on the cataclysms on this list
Not sure i follow. You can go look up all of these events and see what modern science considers potential causes. For example the Toba Catastrophe it was (likely) a super-volcano eruption. For the Younger Dryas it was (likely) a glacial asteroid impact causing global flooding. These - surficially unconnected - catastrophes turn out to follow a repeating 26,000 year cycle, according to our best (fuzzy) data. That demands further inquiry, so if your statement here is meant to express a kind of “move along, nothing to see here” attitude, I think that’s flat backwards.
Regarding your spitballing, that would require proving the Precession, which is fact, has no effect, which is frankly an insane thing to assume, and furthermore refuted by even a cursory look into the notion of the “Ages” of man. That could be an interesting subject for a spin-off thread. You should make it!
Okay so you want the whole thing built in Leo. And you've also described the Leo era as one big cataclysm from Younger Dryas to end of Wisconsin Ice Age, and the pyramid and sphinx are designed therein to survive that extant crisis, and presumably the next one?
But if we went full credulous and favored the "neatness" of the theory, the reason that meteors and volcanoes follow this exact timeframe (and presumably never any other to that degree) would still be unstated. The mechanisms you propose don't match up, as there's nothing in the earth's axial tilt that makes these epoch significant for space phenomena.
What is significant is a bunch of Homo sapiens seeing (for now let's stick with) bull, ram, fish, man in the sky, and creating a narrative of epochs of roughly 2,000 years out of that, and then fitting all kinds of other data around it. And in particular both demons and humans would have an interest in using that to claim a greater correlation with past events. So that gives me a little more credence for the idea that the greater phenomenon is the selling of the narrative than the actual sky events. For instance, if we get enough people believing we should have an ELE between now and 2700 AD then maybe we can manifest it; that's a much greater causative potential than the fact that the Sphinx literally sees Aquarius this next Easter morn. I mean, it would stand to reason that much more would be made of what the people are excited about the sphinx seeing, than could be made of a clockwork dislodging of an asteroid or tectonic shift that some how relates to the distant constellation.
Because you and the sources never jump to THE END IS NEAR even though the natural corollary is that the dawning of the Age of Aquarius brings extinction and a total civilization wipe. You've taken several tries of not formulating evidence just for me to get to this much understanding of the evidence on my own, in spite of the "help" given. You're not one of those creepy glowies who keep feeding the other person hints until the other draws the conclusion on his own and thinks it his own and gets blamed for being the millenarian, are you?
Look, 9/11 becomes just a visualization exercise under that hypothesis, of course we know the cabal wants us to believe the cataclysm is nigh. What good is a predictive theory if it isn't used to predict anything except that if I apply the narrative it predicts my own demise? I already have a fine, much more detailed narrative theory connected to cataclysms during the coming of The Man, thank you very much. Better ending too.
So (without arguing the math and science) why don't you just jump right to the end being near with this theory? 35,100 more weeks!
It’s odd to hear from a Christian that he sees absolutely no (non-demonic-)significance behind the fact that his people chose the fish as their symbol, 2000 years ago, precisely coincident with the dawn of the age of pisces. Nor that this piscean age overthrew the age of the Ram, a common sacrifice of the previous age of Aries, which itself overthrew the age of the (brass, burning) bull. Aquarius, the water bearer is now the current age. Well, it wouldn’t be the craziest thing to call this the (dawn of the) age of women.
Because you and the sources never jump to THE END IS NEAR…why don’t you…?
even though the natural corollary is that the dawning of the Age of Aquarius brings extinction and a total civilization wipe.
That’s not quite it though is it - it represents not “guaranteed extinction” but “great upheaval” or even “tribulation”. You know what else was a great upheaval which kicks off a grand adventure or journey? Leaving the Garden. The Flood. The Rapture. All things you’re intimately familiar with.
I think the case is pretty convincing that the Sphinx was constructed during the age of Leo, facing the direction of Leo. I think it’s reasonable to link the Sphinx construction date and the great Pyramid construction date, though to what extent is debatable. Suffice it to say that atleast part of the complex was constructed in alignment with the age of Leo.
(Other than the mismatch in significant digits), Those numbers all seem fine as a jumping off point. It should be noted that “onset of the younger dryas” at 12,900 and “end of Wisconsin ice age” (~11,700 years according to google) would be describing the two boundaries of one cataclysm, not two different ones 1,000 years apart. Which is to say that this should all be approached with the recognition that “fuzziness” in the numbers is inescapable, and thus to let that be the core of any objection is, imo, a disingenuous approach, so hopefully we don’t see that tact.
That’s a theory, for sure. I think there are atleast a few others worth considering as well. Namely geomagnetic pole drifts/excursions/reversals, Milankovich (solar forcing) cycles, “cosmic environment” theories (along the lines of the ‘Electric Universe’ theory). Probably others im forgetting or have never come across.
While suspending my judgment for the purposes of the roundtable, how does the pyramid point to this whole cycle of cataclysms? What value would it have had in relation to any of these events, other than to be something that might survive global flood? And your big reason for backdating the sphinx is that the sphinx would then be looking at Leo at sunrise in spring only rather than in winter only? And you don't know what brought on the cataclysms on this list (as opposed to others) but it just neatly aligned with these precession eras as if some hand were guiding them to align?
How about this: A real conspiracy would be if geologists conspired to ensure that cataclysm dates would align roughly with precession dates such that they could be compiled into such a list later to prove the zodiac had power. That seems a lot easier than having spirits actually align all these events and actually cause all that damage for real. It also seems wiser not to ascribe too much to those spirits when we know they like to lie about numbers and correlations. Just spitballing.
Asked and answered, though oddly treated as if that isn’t a direct answer to the question… remember, the idea is that the site itself is built in recognition of the Precession (pointing to Leo in the Age of Leo) - its only “goal” or “purpose” at that point is to survive the next cataclysm.
Not sure i follow. You can go look up all of these events and see what modern science considers potential causes. For example the Toba Catastrophe it was (likely) a super-volcano eruption. For the Younger Dryas it was (likely) a glacial asteroid impact causing global flooding. These - surficially unconnected - catastrophes turn out to follow a repeating 26,000 year cycle, according to our best (fuzzy) data. That demands further inquiry, so if your statement here is meant to express a kind of “move along, nothing to see here” attitude, I think that’s flat backwards.
Regarding your spitballing, that would require proving the Precession, which is fact, has no effect, which is frankly an insane thing to assume, and furthermore refuted by even a cursory look into the notion of the “Ages” of man. That could be an interesting subject for a spin-off thread. You should make it!
Okay so you want the whole thing built in Leo. And you've also described the Leo era as one big cataclysm from Younger Dryas to end of Wisconsin Ice Age, and the pyramid and sphinx are designed therein to survive that extant crisis, and presumably the next one?
But if we went full credulous and favored the "neatness" of the theory, the reason that meteors and volcanoes follow this exact timeframe (and presumably never any other to that degree) would still be unstated. The mechanisms you propose don't match up, as there's nothing in the earth's axial tilt that makes these epoch significant for space phenomena.
What is significant is a bunch of Homo sapiens seeing (for now let's stick with) bull, ram, fish, man in the sky, and creating a narrative of epochs of roughly 2,000 years out of that, and then fitting all kinds of other data around it. And in particular both demons and humans would have an interest in using that to claim a greater correlation with past events. So that gives me a little more credence for the idea that the greater phenomenon is the selling of the narrative than the actual sky events. For instance, if we get enough people believing we should have an ELE between now and 2700 AD then maybe we can manifest it; that's a much greater causative potential than the fact that the Sphinx literally sees Aquarius this next Easter morn. I mean, it would stand to reason that much more would be made of what the people are excited about the sphinx seeing, than could be made of a clockwork dislodging of an asteroid or tectonic shift that some how relates to the distant constellation.
Because you and the sources never jump to THE END IS NEAR even though the natural corollary is that the dawning of the Age of Aquarius brings extinction and a total civilization wipe. You've taken several tries of not formulating evidence just for me to get to this much understanding of the evidence on my own, in spite of the "help" given. You're not one of those creepy glowies who keep feeding the other person hints until the other draws the conclusion on his own and thinks it his own and gets blamed for being the millenarian, are you?
Look, 9/11 becomes just a visualization exercise under that hypothesis, of course we know the cabal wants us to believe the cataclysm is nigh. What good is a predictive theory if it isn't used to predict anything except that if I apply the narrative it predicts my own demise? I already have a fine, much more detailed narrative theory connected to cataclysms during the coming of The Man, thank you very much. Better ending too.
So (without arguing the math and science) why don't you just jump right to the end being near with this theory? 35,100 more weeks!
It’s odd to hear from a Christian that he sees absolutely no (non-demonic-)significance behind the fact that his people chose the fish as their symbol, 2000 years ago, precisely coincident with the dawn of the age of pisces. Nor that this piscean age overthrew the age of the Ram, a common sacrifice of the previous age of Aries, which itself overthrew the age of the (brass, burning) bull. Aquarius, the water bearer is now the current age. Well, it wouldn’t be the craziest thing to call this the (dawn of the) age of women.
https://communities.win/c/TheDonald/p/15JU7rN3xg/this-is-whats-driving-all-the-ac/c
That’s not quite it though is it - it represents not “guaranteed extinction” but “great upheaval” or even “tribulation”. You know what else was a great upheaval which kicks off a grand adventure or journey? Leaving the Garden. The Flood. The Rapture. All things you’re intimately familiar with.
Really, this deserves its own thread.