Augustine of Hippo: "Judaism, since Christ, is a corruption; indeed, Judas is the image of the Jewish people: their understanding of Scripture is carnal; they bear the guilt for the death of the Savior, for through their fathers they have killed Christ. The Jews held Him; the Jews insulted Him; the Jews bound Him; they crowned Him with thorns; they scourged Him; they hanged Him upon a tree."
I want to tell you a big secret. Listen carefully.
John 19:10-11: "So Pilate said to Him, 'You do not speak to me? Do You not know that I have authority to release You, and I have authority to crucify You?' Jesus answered, 'You would have no authority over Me, unless it had been given you from above; for this reason he (Judas) who delivered Me to you has the greater sin.'"
John 18:35: "Pilate answered Jesus, 'Your own nation (the Jewish people) and the chief priests delivered You to me; what did You do?'"
Matthew 26:24: "The Son of Man is going, just as it is written of Him; but woe to that man (Judas) by whom the Son of Man is delivered up! It would have been good for that man if he had not been born."
Matthew 27:22-25: "Pilate said to them, 'Then, what shall I do with Jesus who is called Christ?' They all (the Jews) said, 'Let Him be crucified!' And he said, 'Why, what evil did He do?' But they were crying out all the more, saying, 'Let Him be crucified!' Now when Pilate saw that he was accomplishing nothing, but rather that a riot was starting, he took water and washed his hands in front of the crowd, saying, 'I am innocent of this man’s blood; see to that yourselves.' And all the (Jewish) people answered and said, 'His blood be on us and on our children!'
His name, Judas ( Ioudas), is the Greek form of Judah, the southern territory of Palestine (renamed Judea by the Romans). The inhabitants of Judah were the Judahites (later abbreviated as “Jews”), and thus Judas’ name is equated with the Jews. (Source)
Matthew 8:10-12: "Jesus said: 'Truly I say to you, I have not found such great faith with anyone in Israel. And I say to you that many (the Christians) will come from east and west, and recline at the table with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven; but the sons of the kingdom (the Jews) will be cast out into the outer darkness; in that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.'"
Matthew 21:43: "Jesus said: 'Therefore the kingdom of God will be taken away from you (the Jews) and given to a nation (the Christians), producing the fruit of it.'"
Origen: "And we say with confidence that they (the Jews) will never be restored to their former condition. For they committed a crime of the most unhallowed kind, in conspiring against the Savior of the human race in that city where they offered up to God a worship containing the symbols of mighty mysteries. It accordingly behooved that city where Jesus underwent these sufferings to perish utterly, and the Jewish nation to be overthrown, and the invitation to happiness offered them by God to pass to others, — the Christians."
we should also consider the things john hyrcanus did with the forced integration of nons. it is highly likely those referred to here are from those conversos
Your conspiracy? Perhaps that some Jews betrayed Jesus? (I hear they came to the right mind at pentecost) Or perhaps even further back when the Israelites chose the enemies in the form of a golden calf, all the while Moses is on the mountain, with God, as He is writing the law on the first tablets for us.. And then a line was drawn in the sand.. Which side are you on?
YOUR aka YOU ARE (judah) based on claiming self as I AM (je suis; jesus)...
a) Jesus (i am) betrays Christ (anointed one) by taking into possession what a process divides into potential...Judah (you are) was shaped by Jesus (i am) while betraying Christ.
b) Another layer of deception...BE (being) TRAY (to transfer) AL (all) aka all (motion) transferring (momentum) each one (matter).
Be-tray-al implies the status quo of coming into being aka of being christened...an analytical process. A jew suggests loyalty to invert it into a synthesis. If a gentile consents to be LOYAL, then a jew becomes ROYAL.
Loyalty (slave) implies the origin of royalty (master)...
I don't follow that line of thinking.. I am hidden with The I Am, by the Anointed One, Who Is The Saviour, He has brought me to Himself and there I am hid. He welcomes even those that have betrayed Him. He loved us first. The creation by design is lower than The Creator, Yahweh, The Most High Name, but He gives us free will of choice to be slaves to ourselves and others instead of to the only One who can love us best.
"Don't" implies circular reasoning (do vs don't), which prevents a straight line of thinking.
God implies "doing everything"...others suggest "doing nothing" to invert that within ones mind.
a) God reveals all through each...it's ones free will of choice to hide from revelation within ignorance.
b) Before one can take possession as "I Am"...all processes each ones potential apart from one another. As in...one couldn't take if all wasn't giving one being to take.
All was before one came into being, and "I Am" implies a being ignoring what was given by taking possession over self as I AM (jesus), which brands any other as YOU ARE (judah).
c) The separation of all into each one implies anointment aka coming into being as anointed one...a revelation; not something hidden.
I AM (jesus) implies taking possession into mind/memory aka saving it, which corrupting anointment (christ). God implies motion aka revelation of matter, which cannot be saved since it moves.
Bringing implies revelation...only within all can one be free from one another. Bringing into being implies separation (anointment) from one another.
One cannot be hidden...only hiding discernment underneath ignorance of all given.
He implies God; welcome implies each one within coming into well/will...by anointment (christening) from one another.
Even implies God giving balance; those implies each ones choice within being at odds with one another.
He aka God aka first implies "giving"...love vs hate or us vs them implies "taking" a side against one another, while ignoring all given.
Design implies "division of sight" aka God giving sight to each divided one within...consenting to suggested creation-ism shapes the one suggesting into a creator who can re-design ones thought at will.
A name can only be the most high, because it slaps a label on anything UNDERNEATH. God implies sound giving instruments the potential to shape names...taking that potential into possession by branding anything with a name ignores God, hence the conflict about giving God a name.
Sound cannot be named without contradicting flow (sound) with form (word)...but contradiction can be "saved" within memory for a while.
US implies "united states"...that contradicts free aka each separated state freed from one another.
A plural can only wield free will of choice from within confinement to one another...that ain't free, but a contradiction like "I freely choose this prison food over that prison food".
US (plural) contradicts ONLY ONE (singular)...God implies singularity; not plurality.
Imagine thinking you are part of this community, enough that you should mod it, and not understanding free-wiil-of-choice.
Sad.
Am I not allowed to disagree? Where is my free will of choice then?
a) If I AM (je suis; jesus), then YOU ARE (jew dah, judah)...that's the fictitious exploit.
b) In reality...if each represents an anointed one (christ) aka separated from one another, then consenting to one another's suggestion shapes another into a chosen one, and self into an anti-christ.
The corruption of ignorance within each christ (anointed one), who selects another (chosen one) over self.
All gives each anointed one free will of choice...choosing to select another inverts ones choice into a chosen one, while turning self against (anti) anointment (christ).
Before one can select another, one has to claim self as I AM (jesus), which brands any other into a YOU ARE (judah).
If potential (life) during process (inception towards death) takes self into possession, then ones DE NIAL (the nail) of being moved ACROSS (a cross) can be exploited by another.
If a being (be) responds (re) to storage (stored), then that implies a burdening of self during the natural process of relieving burden aka setting being free.
a) ION implies action aka flow (inception towards death) generating reacting form (life). Only within flow can form come into being.
b) CON (together) DITI/DEIK (to show by speech) tempts one to ignore that flow separates form apart from one another.
c) CON implies gentiles together; DITI implies each jew apart showing gentiles to come together; ION implies God ignored by gentiles, which each jew exploits.