Your conspiracy? Perhaps that some Jews betrayed Jesus? (I hear they came to the right mind at pentecost) Or perhaps even further back when the Israelites chose the enemies in the form of a golden calf, all the while Moses is on the mountain, with God, as He is writing the law on the first tablets for us.. And then a line was drawn in the sand.. Which side are you on?
YOUR aka YOU ARE (judah) based on claiming self as I AM (je suis; jesus)...
Perhaps that some jews betrayed Jesus?
a) Jesus (i am) betrays Christ (anointed one) by taking into possession what a process divides into potential...Judah (you are) was shaped by Jesus (i am) while betraying Christ.
b) Another layer of deception...BE (being) TRAY (to transfer) AL (all) aka all (motion) transferring (momentum) each one (matter).
Be-tray-al implies the status quo of coming into being aka of being christened...an analytical process. A jew suggests loyalty to invert it into a synthesis. If a gentile consents to be LOYAL, then a jew becomes ROYAL.
Loyalty (slave) implies the origin of royalty (master)...
I don't follow that line of thinking.. I am hidden with The I Am, by the Anointed One, Who Is The Saviour, He has brought me to Himself and there I am hid. He welcomes even those that have betrayed Him. He loved us first. The creation by design is lower than The Creator, Yahweh, The Most High Name, but He gives us free will of choice to be slaves to ourselves and others instead of to the only One who can love us best.
"Don't" implies circular reasoning (do vs don't), which prevents a straight line of thinking.
God implies "doing everything"...others suggest "doing nothing" to invert that within ones mind.
I am hidden with The I Am, by the Anointed One
a) God reveals all through each...it's ones free will of choice to hide from revelation within ignorance.
b) Before one can take possession as "I Am"...all processes each ones potential apart from one another. As in...one couldn't take if all wasn't giving one being to take.
All was before one came into being, and "I Am" implies a being ignoring what was given by taking possession over self as I AM (jesus), which brands any other as YOU ARE (judah).
c) The separation of all into each one implies anointment aka coming into being as anointed one...a revelation; not something hidden.
Who Is The Saviour
I AM (jesus) implies taking possession into mind/memory aka saving it, which corrupting anointment (christ). God implies motion aka revelation of matter, which cannot be saved since it moves.
He has brought me to Himself and there I am hid.
Bringing implies revelation...only within all can one be free from one another. Bringing into being implies separation (anointment) from one another.
One cannot be hidden...only hiding discernment underneath ignorance of all given.
He welcomes
He implies God; welcome implies each one within coming into well/will...by anointment (christening) from one another.
even those
Even implies God giving balance; those implies each ones choice within being at odds with one another.
He loved us first.
He aka God aka first implies "giving"...love vs hate or us vs them implies "taking" a side against one another, while ignoring all given.
The creation by design is lower than The Creator
Design implies "division of sight" aka God giving sight to each divided one within...consenting to suggested creation-ism shapes the one suggesting into a creator who can re-design ones thought at will.
The Most High Name
A name can only be the most high, because it slaps a label on anything UNDERNEATH. God implies sound giving instruments the potential to shape names...taking that potential into possession by branding anything with a name ignores God, hence the conflict about giving God a name.
Sound cannot be named without contradicting flow (sound) with form (word)...but contradiction can be "saved" within memory for a while.
gives us free will of choice
US implies "united states"...that contradicts free aka each separated state freed from one another.
A plural can only wield free will of choice from within confinement to one another...that ain't free, but a contradiction like "I freely choose this prison food over that prison food".
the only One who can love us
US (plural) contradicts ONLY ONE (singular)...God implies singularity; not plurality.
Your conspiracy? Perhaps that some Jews betrayed Jesus? (I hear they came to the right mind at pentecost) Or perhaps even further back when the Israelites chose the enemies in the form of a golden calf, all the while Moses is on the mountain, with God, as He is writing the law on the first tablets for us.. And then a line was drawn in the sand.. Which side are you on?
YOUR aka YOU ARE (judah) based on claiming self as I AM (je suis; jesus)...
a) Jesus (i am) betrays Christ (anointed one) by taking into possession what a process divides into potential...Judah (you are) was shaped by Jesus (i am) while betraying Christ.
b) Another layer of deception...BE (being) TRAY (to transfer) AL (all) aka all (motion) transferring (momentum) each one (matter).
Be-tray-al implies the status quo of coming into being aka of being christened...an analytical process. A jew suggests loyalty to invert it into a synthesis. If a gentile consents to be LOYAL, then a jew becomes ROYAL.
Loyalty (slave) implies the origin of royalty (master)...
I don't follow that line of thinking.. I am hidden with The I Am, by the Anointed One, Who Is The Saviour, He has brought me to Himself and there I am hid. He welcomes even those that have betrayed Him. He loved us first. The creation by design is lower than The Creator, Yahweh, The Most High Name, but He gives us free will of choice to be slaves to ourselves and others instead of to the only One who can love us best.
"Don't" implies circular reasoning (do vs don't), which prevents a straight line of thinking.
God implies "doing everything"...others suggest "doing nothing" to invert that within ones mind.
a) God reveals all through each...it's ones free will of choice to hide from revelation within ignorance.
b) Before one can take possession as "I Am"...all processes each ones potential apart from one another. As in...one couldn't take if all wasn't giving one being to take.
All was before one came into being, and "I Am" implies a being ignoring what was given by taking possession over self as I AM (jesus), which brands any other as YOU ARE (judah).
c) The separation of all into each one implies anointment aka coming into being as anointed one...a revelation; not something hidden.
I AM (jesus) implies taking possession into mind/memory aka saving it, which corrupting anointment (christ). God implies motion aka revelation of matter, which cannot be saved since it moves.
Bringing implies revelation...only within all can one be free from one another. Bringing into being implies separation (anointment) from one another.
One cannot be hidden...only hiding discernment underneath ignorance of all given.
He implies God; welcome implies each one within coming into well/will...by anointment (christening) from one another.
Even implies God giving balance; those implies each ones choice within being at odds with one another.
He aka God aka first implies "giving"...love vs hate or us vs them implies "taking" a side against one another, while ignoring all given.
Design implies "division of sight" aka God giving sight to each divided one within...consenting to suggested creation-ism shapes the one suggesting into a creator who can re-design ones thought at will.
A name can only be the most high, because it slaps a label on anything UNDERNEATH. God implies sound giving instruments the potential to shape names...taking that potential into possession by branding anything with a name ignores God, hence the conflict about giving God a name.
Sound cannot be named without contradicting flow (sound) with form (word)...but contradiction can be "saved" within memory for a while.
US implies "united states"...that contradicts free aka each separated state freed from one another.
A plural can only wield free will of choice from within confinement to one another...that ain't free, but a contradiction like "I freely choose this prison food over that prison food".
US (plural) contradicts ONLY ONE (singular)...God implies singularity; not plurality.
Imagine thinking you are part of this community, enough that you should mod it, and not understanding free-wiil-of-choice.
Sad.
Am I not allowed to disagree? Where is my free will of choice then?