If you want me to search the archive and provide the debunk, which is obviously evidence in the category of inference to best explanation because a matter like this can't be proven fictional without doubt unless there is a confession or serious investigative work, then I will be happy to do so at my leisure. I don't keep a thumb-index file on this very silly subject. It might help me if you stop spamming the boards.
Conspiracies is a forum for pursuit of Truth. I routinely ask people if they are willing to pursue Truth at all costs. Those who do not answer are easily classified as uninterested. Students of Truth respect inference to the best explanation; the uninterested are usually illogical about it.
By what proof did you buy the actor's lies in the first place? I will be happy to meet the same standard of proof you use for the people you agree with.
Actor: "I'm Rabbi Abe Finkelstein with this resume."
Me: "There's no evidence a Rabbi Abe Finkelstein exists with his resume."
Thanks, archive indexing is underway, will ping you when I hit it. IMHO it's the same conclusion anyone reasonable would come to in an hour of reviewing what's online about it.
I told you it's in the files. It's also self-evident to any reasonable person who finds and reads the whole transcript. If you're willing to (stop spamming and) wait long enough for me to find the page I'll give it to you.
If you want me to search the archive and provide the debunk, which is obviously evidence in the category of inference to best explanation because a matter like this can't be proven fictional without doubt unless there is a confession or serious investigative work, then I will be happy to do so at my leisure. I don't keep a thumb-index file on this very silly subject. It might help me if you stop spamming the boards.
Conspiracies is a forum for pursuit of Truth. I routinely ask people if they are willing to pursue Truth at all costs. Those who do not answer are easily classified as uninterested. Students of Truth respect inference to the best explanation; the uninterested are usually illogical about it.
I said proof, not evidence. It can't be a debunk without proof, otherwise it's just heresay.
By what proof did you buy the actor's lies in the first place? I will be happy to meet the same standard of proof you use for the people you agree with.
Actor: "I'm Rabbi Abe Finkelstein with this resume."
Me: "There's no evidence a Rabbi Abe Finkelstein exists with his resume."
Same standard of proof applies to both.
Waiting on your proof also...
Thanks, archive indexing is underway, will ping you when I hit it. IMHO it's the same conclusion anyone reasonable would come to in an hour of reviewing what's online about it.
I've provided more proof than you have, which is none.
I told you it's in the files. It's also self-evident to any reasonable person who finds and reads the whole transcript. If you're willing to (stop spamming and) wait long enough for me to find the page I'll give it to you.
You don't understand what any of the words you use mean.