I like to reply to Joe when I have something to add. Here, the issue is that Gish didn't actually use the Gish gallop because he had so many good refutals of the same lines of opposition at once that they claimed they were all inaccurate and weak. A better neutral term for the tactic intended is "elephant hurling" because that applies whether the arguments are weak or strong. I do see that elephant hurling seems to be going on today ....
You’re incapable of refuting a single one of them.
The jew cries out in pain as it strikes you.
The projection is real. Get it? Isreal?
Look at the front page and tell me what you see 👑
Explain the OXR alts then ❓
a) Nature doesn't orate...any rhetoric was shaped artificially to distract from nature.
b) Taking debate (the bait) gets one caught...
c) Known cannot be claimed since it moves.
I forgot what this was called until this post. That's exactly what they do.
Why are you replying to your sockpuppet.
Yawn. You’re screaming at soundproof glass.
I like to reply to Joe when I have something to add. Here, the issue is that Gish didn't actually use the Gish gallop because he had so many good refutals of the same lines of opposition at once that they claimed they were all inaccurate and weak. A better neutral term for the tactic intended is "elephant hurling" because that applies whether the arguments are weak or strong. I do see that elephant hurling seems to be going on today ....
The audacity of the jew knows no bounds
https://communities.win/c/Meta/p/1ARK5BG2s7/the-amount-of-posts-josephgoebbe/c